No abstract

No abstract

Background: Drug resistance is a challenge for the global control of tuberculosis. We examined mortality in tuberculosis patients from high-burden countries, according to concordance or discordance of results from drug susceptibility testing (DST) done locally and in a reference laboratory. Methods: We collected Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from adult patients in Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Peru, and Thailand, stratified by HIV status and tuberculosis drug resistance. Molecular or phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) was done locally and at the Swiss tuberculosis reference laboratory. We examined mortality during treatment according to DST results and treatment adequacy in logistic regression models adjusting for sex, age, sputum microscopy and HIV status. Findings: 634 tuberculosis patients were included; median age was 33.2 years, 239 (37.7%) were female, 272 (42.9%) HIV-positive and 69 (10.9%) patients died. Based on the reference laboratory DST, 394 (62.2%) strains were pan-susceptible, 45 (7.1%) mono-resistant, 163 (25.7%) multidrug-resistant (MDR-TB), and 30 (4.7%) had pre-extensive or extensive drug resistance (pre-XDR/XDR-TB). Results of reference and local laboratories were discordant in 121 (19.1%) cases. Overall, sensitivity and specificity to detect any resistance were 90.8% and 84.3%, respectively. Mortality ranged from 6.0% (20/336) in patients with pan-susceptible tuberculosis treated according to WHO guidelines to 57.1% (8/14) in patients with resistant strains who were under treated. In logistic regression, compared to concordant DST results, the adjusted odds ratio of death was 7.33 (95% CI 2.70–19.95) for patients with discordant results potentially leading to under treatment. Interpretation: Inaccurate DST by comparison to a reference standard led to under treatment of drug resistant tuberculosis and increased mortality. Rapid molecular DST of first- and second-line drugs at diagnosis is required to improve outcomes in patients with MDR-TB and pre-XDR/XDR-TB.

Whole-genome sequencing allows rapid detection of drug-resistantMycobacterium tuberculosisisolates. However, the availability of high-quality data linking quantitative phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) and genomic data have thus far been limited. We determined drug resistance profiles of 176 genetically diverse clinicalM. tuberculosisisolates from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ivory Coast, Peru, Thailand, and Switzerland by quantitative phenotypic DST for 11 antituberculous drugs using the BD Bactec MGIT 960 system and 7H10 agar dilution to generate a cross-validated phenotypic DST readout. We compared DST results with predicted drug resistance profiles inferred by whole-genome sequencing. Classification of strains by the two phenotypic DST methods into resistotype/wild-type populations was concordant in 73 to 99% of cases, depending on the drug. Our data suggest that the established critical concentration (5 mg/liter) for ethambutol resistance (MGIT 960 system) is too high and misclassifies strains as susceptible, unlike 7H10 agar dilution. Increased minimal inhibitory concentrations were explained by mutations identified by whole-genome sequencing. Using whole-genome sequences, we were able to predict quantitative drug resistance levels for the majority of drug resistance mutations. Predicting quantitative levels of drug resistance by whole-genome sequencing was partially limited due to incompletely understood drug resistance mechanisms. The overall sensitivity and specificity of whole-genome-based DST were 86.8% and 94.5%, respectively. Despite some limitations, whole-genome sequencing has the potential to infer resistance profiles without the need for time-consuming phenotypic methods.