Human airways produce nitric oxide (NO), and exhaled NO increases as expiratory flow rates fall. We show that mixing during exhalation between the NO produced by the lower, alveolar airways (VL(NO)) and the upper conducting airways (VU(NO)) explains this phenomenon and permits measurement of VL(NO), VU(NO), and the NO diffusing capacity of the conducting airways (DU(NO)). After breath holding for 10-15 s the partial pressure of alveolar NO (PA) becomes constant, and during a subsequent exhalation at a constant expiratory flow rate the alveoli will deliver a stable amount of NO to the conducting airways. The conducting airways secrete NO into the lumen (VU(NO)), which mixes with PA during exhalation, resulting in the observed expiratory concentration of NO (PE). At fast exhalations, PA makes a large contribution to PE, and, at slow exhalations, NO from the conducting airways predominates. Simple equations describing this mixing, combined with measurements of PE at several different expiratory flow rates, permit calculation of PA, VU(NO), and DU(NO). VL(NO) is the product of PA and the alveolar airway diffusion capacity for NO. In seven normal subjects, PA = 1.6 +/- 0.7 x 10(-6) (SD) Torr, VL(NO) = 0.19 +/- 0.07 microl/min, VU(NO) = 0.08 +/- 0.05 microl/min, and DU(NO) = 0.4 +/- 0.4 ml. min(-1). Torr(-1). These quantitative measurements of VL(NO) and VU(NO) are suitable for exploring alterations in NO production at these sites by diseases and physiological stresses.
We wish to submit a new manuscript entitled "Fully Online Clustering of Evolving Data Streams into Arbitrarily Shaped Clusters" for consideration by Information Sciences. We confirm that this work is original and has not been published elsewhere nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere. In this paper, we report on a new technique for fully online clustering of data into arbitrarily shaped clusters. This is significant because alternative techniques are hybrid online/ offline systems providing incremental updates on the clustering results whereas our technique provide continuous access to the clusters. The paper should be of interest to readers in the areas of mining of data streams or monitoring of online systems in many fields, although our interest lies primarily in atmospheric science.
Particulate air pollution is associated with asthma exacerbations and increased morbidity and mortality from respiratory causes. Ultrafine particles (particles less than 0.1 microm in diameter) may contribute to these adverse effects because they have a higher predicted pulmonary deposition, greater potential to induce pulmonary inflammation, larger surface area, and enhanced oxidant capacity when compared with larger particles on a mass basis. We hypothesized that ultrafine particle exposure would induce airway inflammation in susceptible humans. This hypothesis was tested in a series of randomized, double-blind studies by exposing healthy subjects and mild asthmatic subjects to carbon ultrafine particles versus filtered air. Both exposures were delivered via a mouthpiece system during rest and moderate exercise. Healthy subjects were exposed to particle concentrations of 10, 25, and 50 microg/m(3), while asthmatics were exposed to 10 microg/m(3). Lung function and airway inflammation were assessed by symptom scores, pulmonary function tests, and airway nitric oxide parameters. Airway inflammatory cells were measured via induced sputum analysis in several of the protocols. There were no differences in any of these measurements in normal or asthmatic subjects when exposed to ultrafine particles at concentrations of 10 or 25 microg/m(3). However, exposing 16 normal subjects to the higher concentration of 50 microg/m(3) caused a reduction in maximal midexpiratory flow rate (-4.34 +/- 1.78% [ultrafine particles] vs. +1.08 +/- 1.86% [air], p =.042) and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (-1.76 +/- 0.66 ml/min/mm Hg [ultrafine particles] vs. -0.18 +/- 0.41 ml/min/mm Hg [air], p =.040) at 21 h after exposure. There were no consistent differences in symptoms, induced sputum, or exhaled nitric oxide parameters in any of these studies. These results suggest that exposure to carbon ultrafine particles results in mild small-airways dysfunction together with impaired alveolar gas exchange in normal subjects. These effects do not appear related to airway inflammation. Additional studies are required to confirm these findings in normal subjects, compare them with additional susceptible patient populations, and determine their pathophysiologic mechanisms.
Exercise and inflammatory lung disorders such as asthma and acute lung injury increase exhaled nitric oxide (NO). This finding is interpreted as a rise in production of NO by the lungs (VNO) but fails to take into account the diffusing capacity for NO (DNO) that carries NO into the pulmonary capillary blood. We have derived equations to measure VNO from the following rates, which determine NO tension in the lungs (PL) at any moment from 1) production (VNO); 2) diffusion, where DNO(PL) = rate of removal by lung capillary blood; and 3) ventilation, where V A(PL)/(PB - 47) = the rate of NO removal by alveolar ventilation (V A) and PB is barometric pressure. During open-circuit breathing when PL is not in equilibrium, d/dt PL[V(L)/ (PB - 47)] (where V(L) is volume of NO in the lower airways) = VNO - DNO(PL) - V A(PL)/(PB - 47). When PL reaches a steady state so that d/dt = 0 and V A is eliminated by rebreathing or breath holding, then PL = VNO/DNO. PL can be interpreted as NO production per unit of DNO. This equation predicts that diseases that diminish DNO but do not alter VNO will increase expired NO levels. These equations permit precise measurements of VNO that can be applied to determining factors controlling NO production by the lungs.
The inhibitory effects of oleic acid (OA) on the surface activity of pulmonary surfactant were characterized by use of the oscillating bubble surfactometer, the Wilhelmy balance, and excised rat lungs. Oscillating bubble studies showed that OA prevented lavaged calf surfactant [0.5 mM phospholipid (PL)] from lowering surface tension below 15 mN/m at or above a molar ratio of OA/PL = 0.5. In contrast to inhibition of surfactant by plasma proteins, increasing the surfactant concentration did not eliminate inhibition by oleic acid, which occurred at OA/PL greater than 0.67 on the oscillating bubble even at surfactant concentrations of 1.5 and 12 mM PL. Studies of surfactant adsorption showed that preformed films of OA had little effect on the adsorption of pulmonary surfactant. Wilhelmy balance studies showed that OA did interfere with the ability of spread films of surfactant to reach low surface tensions during dynamic compression. Further balance experiments with binary films of OA and dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine showed that these compounds were miscible in surface films. Together these findings suggested that OA inhibited pulmonary surfactant activity by disrupting the rigid interfacial film responsible for the generation of very low surface tension during dynamic compression. Mechanical studies in excised rat lungs showed that instillation of OA gave altered deflation pressure-volume characteristics with decreased quasi-static compliance, indicating disruption of pulmonary surfactant function in situ. This alteration of mechanics occurred without major changes in the composition of lavaged PLs or in the tissue compliance of the lungs defined by mechanical measurements during inflation-deflation with saline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.