Sport makes an important contribution to the physical, psychological and emotional well-being of Australians. The economic contribution of sport is equivalent to 2-3% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The COVID-19 pandemic has had devastating effects on communities globally, leading to significant restrictions on all sectors of society, including sport. Resumption of sport can significantly contribute to the re-establishment of normality in Australian society. The Australian Institute of Sport (AIS), in consultation with sport partners (National Institute Network (NIN) Directors, NIN Chief Medical Officers (CMOs), National Sporting Organisation (NSO) Presidents, NSO Performance Directors and NSO CMOs), has developed a framework to inform the resumption of sport. National Principles for Resumption of Sport were used as a guide in the development of 'the AIS Framework for Rebooting Sport in a COVID-19 Environment' (the AIS Framework); and based on current best evidence, and guidelines from the Australian Federal Government, extrapolated into the sporting context by specialists in sport and exercise medicine, infectious diseases and public health. The principles outlined in this document apply to high performance/professional, community and individual passive (non-contact) sport. The AIS Framework is a timely tool of minimum baseline of standards, for 'how' reintroduction of sport activity will occur in a cautious and methodical manner, based on the best available evidence to optimise athlete and community safety. Decisions regarding the timing of resumption (the 'when') of sporting activity must be made in close consultation with Federal, State/Territory and/or Local Public Health Authorities. The priority at all times must be to preserve public health, minimising the risk of community transmission.

Context:The nature of Australian rules football (Australian football) predisposes both unique and common injuries compared with those sustained in other football codes. The game involves a combination of tackling, kicking, high-speed running (more than other football codes), and jumping. Two decades of injury surveillance has identified common injuries at the professional level (Australian Football League [AFL]).Objective:To provide an overview of injuries in Australian rules football, including injury rates, patterns, and mechanisms across all levels of play.Study Design:A narrative review of AFL injuries, football injury epidemiology, and biomechanical and physiological attributes of relevant injuries.Results:The overall injury incidence in the 2015 season was 41.7 injuries per club per season, with a prevalence of 156.2 missed games per club per season. Lower limb injuries are most prevalent, with hamstring strains accounting for 19.1 missed games per club per season. Hamstring strains relate to the volume of high-speed running required in addition to at times having to collect the ball while running in a position of hip flexion and knee extension. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries are also prevalent and can result from contact and noncontact incidents. In the upper limb, shoulder sprains and dislocations account for 11.5 missed games per club per season and largely resulted from tackling and contact. Concussion is less common in AFL than other tackling sports but remains an important injury, which has notably become more prevalent in recent years, theorized to be due to a more conservative approach to management. Although there are less injury surveillance data for non-AFL players (women, community-level, children), many of these injuries appear to also be common across all levels of play.Clinical Relevance:An understanding of injury profiles and mechanisms in Australian football is crucial in identifying methods to reduce injury risk and prepare players for the demands of the game.

No abstract

Video analysis of situational factors associated with head impacts and concussion has been completed in several sports, however has yet to be completed in cricket. This study aimed to identify situational factors associated with concussion in elite Australian male and female cricket. Match video of head impacts were coded for player position, impacting object, source of ball, location of impact, and where the ball went after impact. Head impacts were then categorised as either concussion or no concussion based on clinical diagnosis. Data for 197 head impacts included 35 (18%) which were diagnosed as concussion. Head impacts typically occurred to an on-strike batter facing a pace bowler (84%). If the ball stopped or rebounded towards the source, 21% were diagnosed as concussion (13% if the ball deflected away from the source). If impact was to an unprotected head, 38% were diagnosed as concussion (16% if impact was to a helmet). If impact was to the back of the helmet or head, 40% were diagnosed as concussion (11–21% for other areas of the head or helmet). The combination of situational factors most consistent with concussion were impact from ball that hit the back of helmet or head and stopped or rebounded towards the source (PPV 80%, p = 0.002). Consideration of the situational factors of a head impact may improve the speed and accuracy of clinical decision making on whether to remove a player from the field for further assessment, particularly if clinical signs are unclear. Video may be used as a tool to support this process. Improved impact attenuation of cricket helmets, particularly at the back, may reduce the risk of concussion.

An increased throwing workload is a risk factor for the development of upper limb injury in elite cricketers. Investigation of the kinematics of throwing in elite cricketers would complement this study, and further research is required to develop detailed throwing workload guidelines for cricketers across a range of ages.

No abstract

The purpose of testing for any communicable disease is to support clinicians in the diagnosis and management of individual patients and to describe transmission dynamics. The novel coronavirus is formally named SARS-CoV-2 and the clinical disease state resulting from an infection is known as COVID-19. Control of the COVID-19 pandemic requires clinicians, epidemiologists, and public health officials to utilise the most comprehensive, accurate and timely information available to manage the rapidly evolving COVID-19 environment. High performance sport is a unique context that may look towards comprehensive testing as a means of risk mitigation. Characteristics of the common testing options are discussed including the circumstances where additional testing may be of benefit and considerations for the associated risks. Finally, a review of the available technology that could be considered for use by medical staff at the point of care (PoC) in a high-performance sporting context is included.

No abstract