To predict development of acute kidney injury and its outcome we retrospectively studied children having cardiac surgery. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined using the serum creatinine criteria of the pediatric Risk Injury Failure Loss End-Stage (pRIFLE) kidney disease definition. We tested whether a small rise (less than 50%) in creatinine on post-operative days 1 or 2 could predict a greater than 50% increase in serum creatinine within 48 h in 390 children. AKI occurred in 36% of patients, mostly in the first 4 post-operative days. Using logistic regression, significant independent risk factors for AKI were bypass time, longer vasopressor use, and a tendency for younger age. Using Cox regression, AKI was independently associated with longer intensive care unit stay and duration of ventilation. Patients whose serum creatinine did not increase on post-operative days 1 or 2 were unlikely to develop AKI (negative predictive values of 87 and 98%, respectively). Percentage serum creatinine rise on post-operative day 1 predicted AKI within 48 h (area under the curve=0.65). Our study shows that AKI after pediatric heart surgery is common and is a risk factor for poorer outcome. Small post-operative increases in serum creatinine may assist in the early prediction of AKI.
Key Points
Question
What are the growth rate and risk of complications in patients with moderately dilated ascending aortas?
Findings
This systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 studies including 8800 patients found that the ascending aorta growth rate was 0.61 mm/y, and the incidence of elective aortic surgery was 13.82%. The linearized mortality rate was 1.99% per patient-year, while the rate of aortic dissection, aortic rupture, and mortality was 2.16% per patient-year.
Meaning
More robust natural history data from prospective studies are needed to better inform clinical decision making in patients with ascending aortic aneurysms.
Perioperative results of extended arch procedures are encouraging. Further follow-up is required to see if long-term complications are reduced with these emerging techniques. The proposed classification system will facilitate future comparison of short- and long-term results of different techniques of extended arch repair for ATAAD.
A literature review and meta-analysis were undertaken to assess the clinical effectiveness of retrograde autologous priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit to reduce allogeneic packed red blood transfusions in adult cardiac surgery. Structured searches of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Collaboration Library, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Science Direct were performed to identify randomized trials comparing retrograde autologous priming to a prospective control group. A total of 21,643 studies were identified and eighteen trials were retrieved for full-text review. Six trials met eligibility criteria. Pooled estimates demonstrated that retrograde autologous priming significantly reduced the number of patients receiving intraoperative packed red cell transfusions (OR=0.36; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.94; P=0.04, I(2)=47.5%), total hospital stay packed red cell transfusions (OR=0.26; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.52; P=0.0001, I(2)=0%), and the number of units transfused of total hospital stay packed red blood cells (WMD=-0.60; 95% CI: -0.90, -0.31; P=0.0001, I(2)=0%). Retrograde autologous priming, however, did not provide a clinical benefit in reducing the number of units transfused of intraoperative packed red blood cells (WMD=-0.29; 95% CI: -0.59, 0.01; P=0.05). The combined patient population studied in the six trials was mainly primary isolated coronary artery bypass surgery. Assessing the safety of retrograde autologous priming was not possible due to limited data.
Patients surviving an AAD have a limited long-term survival. Preservation and repair of the aortic valve is associated with a moderate risk of reoperation, but a low risk of thromboembolism, bleeding and endocarditis.
Centrifugal pump (CP) and roller pump (RP) designs are the dominant main arterial pumps used in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Trials reporting clinical outcome measures comparing CP and RP are controversial. Therefore, a meta‐analysis was undertaken to evaluate clinical variables from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Keyword searches were performed on Medline (1966–2011), EmBase (1980–2011), and CINAHL (1981–2011) for studies comparing RP and CP as the main arterial pump in adult CPB. Pooled fixed‐effects estimates for dichotomous and continuous data were calculated as an odds ratio and weighted‐mean difference, respectively. The P value was utilized to assess statistical significance (P < 0.05) between CP and RP groups. Eighteen RCTs met inclusion criteria, which represented 1868 patients (CP = 961, RP = 907). The prevailing operation was isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CP = 88%, RP = 87%). Fixed‐effects pooled estimates were performed for end‐of‐CPB (ECP) and postoperative day one (PDO) for platelet count (ECP: P = 0.51, PDO: P = 0.16), plasma free hemoglobin (ECP: P = 0.36, PDO: P = 0.24), white blood cell count (ECP: P = 0.21, PDO: P = 0.66), and hematocrit (ECP: P = 0.06, PDO: P = 0.51). No difference was demonstrated for postoperative blood loss (P = 0.65) or red blood cell transfusion (P = 0.71). Intensive care unit length of stay (P = 0.30), hospital length of stay (P = 0.33), and mortality (P = 0.91) were similar between the CP and RP groups. Neurologic outcomes were not amenable to pooled analysis; nevertheless, the results were inconclusive. There was no reported pump‐related malfunction or mishap. The meta‐analysis of RCTs comparing CP and RP in adult cardiac surgery suggests no significant difference for hematological variables, postoperative blood loss, transfusions, neurological outcomes, or mortality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.