No abstract

Identifying groups of similar objects is a popular first step in biomedical data analysis, but it is error-prone and impossible to perform manually. Many computational methods have been developed to tackle this problem. Here we assessed 13 well-known methods using 24 data sets ranging from gene expression to protein domains. Performance was judged on the basis of 13 common cluster validity indices. We developed a clustering analysis platform, ClustEval (http://clusteval.mpi-inf.mpg.de), to promote streamlined evaluation, comparison and reproducibility of clustering results in the future. This allowed us to objectively evaluate the performance of all tools on all data sets with up to 1,000 different parameter sets each, resulting in a total of more than 4 million calculated cluster validity indices. We observed that there was no universal best performer, but on the basis of this wide-ranging comparison we were able to develop a short guideline for biomedical clustering tasks. ClustEval allows biomedical researchers to pick the appropriate tool for their data type and allows method developers to compare their tool to the state of the art.

Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) and gene expression data form a core element of systems biology-based phenotyping. Changes in the expression of transcription factors are commonly believed to have a causal effect on the expression of their targets. Here we evaluated in the best researched model organism, Escherichia coli, the consistency between a GRN and a large gene expression compendium. Surprisingly, a modest correlation was observed between the expression of transcription factors and their targets and, most noteworthy, both activating and repressing interactions were associated with positive correlation. When evaluated using a sign consistency model we found the regulatory network was not more consistent with measured expression than random network models. We conclude that, at least in E. coli, one cannot expect a causal relationship between the expression of transcription and factors their targets, and that the current static GRN does not adequately explain transcriptional regulation. The implications of this are profound as they question what we consider established knowledge of the systemic biology of cells and point to methodological limitations with respect to single omics analysis, static networks and temporality.

Post-genomic analysis techniques such as next-generation sequencing have produced vast amounts of data about micro organisms including genetic sequences, their functional annotations and gene regulatory interactions. The latter are genetic mechanisms that control a cell's characteristics, for instance, pathogenicity as well as survival and reproduction strategies. CoryneRegNet is the reference database and analysis platform for corynebacterial gene regulatory networks. In this article we introduce the updated version 6.0 of CoryneRegNet and describe the updated database content which includes, 6352 corynebacterial regulatory interactions compared with 4928 interactions in release 5.0 and 3235 regulations in release 4.0, respectively. We also demonstrate how we support the community by integrating analysis and visualization features for transiently imported custom data, such as gene regulatory interactions. Furthermore, with release 6.0, we provide easy-to-use functions that allow the user to submit data for persistent storage with the CoryneRegNet database. Thus, it offers important options to its users in terms of community demands. CoryneRegNet is publicly available at http://www.coryneregnet.de.