Esmolol is a beta 1-selective adrenoceptor blocker that is rapidly metabolized by blood and liver esterases. The beta-receptor and hemodynamic effects of esmolol were determined in a group of 12 healthy men and were compared with those induced by both oral and intravenous propranolol. Esmolol was rapidly effective in inducing at least 90% of steady-state beta-blockade within 5 minutes of either initiating or changing the esmolol infusion rate. More importantly, when esmolol infusion was discontinued the beta-blockade had totally disappeared by 18 minutes after esmolol, 300 micrograms/kg/min, and had been reduced by 50% after 750 micrograms/kg/min. In contrast, 30 minutes after discontinuation of a propranolol infusion, there was no change in the level of beta-blockade. Propranolol was much more potent at blocking isoproterenol-induced tachycardia (dose ratio 33.5 +/- 2.5) than was even the highest dose (750 micrograms/kg/min) of esmolol (dose ratio 13.1 +/- 1.0). The same dose of intravenous propranolol was approximately equipotent to oral propranolol, 40 mg every 8 hours (dose ratio 33.5 +/- 2.5 and 34.5 +/- 3.6, respectively). In contrast, propranolol, 40 mg every 8 hours, and esmolol, 300 micrograms/kg/min, were equipotent in antagonizing exercise-induced tachycardia (40.1% +/- 2.3% and 42.7% +/- 3.2%, respectively). Esmolol had striking hypotensive effects. Systolic blood pressure fell by 20 mm Hg during esmolol infusions of 750 micrograms/kg/min. Esmolol appears to be a potent beta 1-selective adrenoceptor antagonist with a particularly strong hypotensive effect. It is likely to be very useful in the treatment of hemodynamically unstable patients and may be useful in the emergency treatment of hypertension.
The ability to hydroxylate debrisoquine is known to be polymorphically distributed, with about 8% to 9% of the North American Caucasian population being poor metabolizers. We have shown that the ability to 4-hydroxylate propranolol is also polymorphically determined and that it cosegregates with ability to metabolize debrisoquine, such that poor debrisoquine metabolizers produce much less 4-hydroxypropranolol (4-OH propranolol) than do extensive metabolizers. There was no significant difference, however, between plasma propranolol concentrations after either single or multiple doses in the two groups. Despite the substantial difference in production of the pharmacologically active 4-OH metabolite, no difference was seen in the extent of beta-blockade induced in the extensive and poor metabolizers, which implies that 4-OH propranolol does not contribute substantially to beta-blockade.
To determine whether the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of beta-blockade differ among racial groups, we gave 10 men of Chinese descent and 10 American white men 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg of propranolol every eight hours; the dosages were given in random order, and each dose was given for one day. The degree of beta-blockade was measured as the reduction in the heart rate and blood pressure in the supine and upright positions and during treadmill exercise testing. The Chinese subjects had at least a twofold greater sensitivity to the beta-blocking effects of propranolol than the white subjects, as indicated by the mean (+/- SEM) plasma concentrations producing a 20 percent reduction in the heart rate in both the supine position (197 +/- 31 vs. 536 +/- 58 nmol per liter; P less than 0.05) and the upright position (131 +/- 27 vs. 343 +/- 39 nmol per liter; P less than 0.05) and after exercise testing (96 +/- 12 vs. 185 +/- 23 nmol per liter; P less than 0.05). In addition, the Chinese subjects had much greater sensitivity to the hypotensive effects of propranolol, as shown by the concentrations that reduced blood pressure by 10 percent in the supine position (73 +/- 5 vs. 748 +/- 7 nmol per liter; P less than 0.01) and in the upright position (89 +/- 5 vs. 401 +/- 6 nmol per liter; P less than 0.01). No difference in beta-receptor density or affinity of lymphocytes was found between the groups. The Chinese group had a 45 percent higher free fraction of propranolol in plasma, which may have contributed to the increased drug effect but cannot explain it entirely. This group metabolized propranolol more rapidly than the white group, which resulted in a 76 percent higher clearance of an oral dose (3740 +/- 737 vs. 2125 +/- 214 ml per minute; P less than 0.05) because of increased metabolism through multiple metabolic pathways. We conclude that Chinese men have greater sensitivity than white men to the effects of propranolol on heart rate and blood pressure. Decreased protein binding may be responsible in part, but most of the effect remains to be explained.
To investigate the mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmia suppression by propranolol, we determined the antiarrhythmic efficacy of d-propranolol in 10 patients with frequent ventricular ectopic depolarizations (VEDs) and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. After an initial placebo phase, 40 mg d-propranolol was administered orally every 6 h with dosage increased every 2 d until arrhythmia suppression (> 80% VED reduction), intolerable side effects, or a maximal dosage (1,280 mg/d) was reached. Response was verified by documenting return of arrhythmia during a final placebo phase. Arrhythmia suppression occurred in six patients while two more had partial responses. Effective dosages were 320-1,280 mg/d (mean 920±360, SD) of d-propranolol with corresponding plasma concentrations of 60-2,280 ng/ml (mean 858±681). For the entire group, the QTc interval shortened by 4±4% (P = 0.03). Arrhythmia suppression was accompanied by a reduction in peak heart rate during exercise of 0-29%. To determine whether arrhythmia suppression could be attributed to betablockade, racemic propranolol was then administered in dosages producing the same or greater depression of exercise heart rate. In 3/8 patients, arrhythmias were not suppressed by racemic propranolol indicating that d-propranolol was effective via a non-beta-mediated action. By contrast, in 5/8 patients racemic propranolol also suppressed VEDs. We conclude that propranolol suppresses ventricular arrhythmias by both beta-and non-beta-adrenergic receptor-mediated effects. (J. Clin. Invest. 1990.85:836-842.) propranolol * antiarrhythmic * ventricular arrhythmias * dextropropranolol-betaadrenergic receptor blockade
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.