Objective: This study assessed attitudes, behaviors, and barriers among general dentists in California, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, related to patient tobacco cessation counseling. Methods: From 2004 to 2008, a baseline survey was mailed to 271 study dentists randomly selected from a master Delta Dental Insurance Company provider list in each state who had agreed to participate in a tobacco cessation randomized clinical trial. Four backward logistic regression models assessed correlates of the five As related to tobacco cessation: Asking about tobacco use, Advising users to quit, Assessing readiness to quit, Assisting with quitting, and Arranging follow‐up. Results: Most respondents (n = 265) were male, had practiced dentistry for over 15 years, asked about tobacco use (74%), and advised tobacco users to quit (78%). Only 19% assessed readiness to quit; 39% assisted with quitting; 4% arranged follow‐up; and 42% had formal training in tobacco cessation. Believing that tobacco cessation counseling was an important professional responsibility, practicing <15 years, and asking about tobacco use significantly related to advising users to quit. Providing cessation advice and feeling effective intervening related to assessing readiness to quit. Advising users to quit, assessing readiness to quit, feeling effective intervening, and having had formal tobacco cessation training related to assisting with quitting. Barriers to cessation counseling were perceived patient resistance (66%), lack of insurance reimbursement (56%), not knowing where to refer (49%), and lack of time (32%). Conclusion: Study dentists reported not fully performing the five As. Advising, assessing, having formal training, and feeling effective increased the likelihood of cessation counseling.

Background An increase in the number of dentists conducting tobacco-use cessation treatment is needed. The authors assessed the effects of high-intensity training (HIT) or low-intensity training (LIT) and reimbursement on general dentists’ tobacco-use–related attitudes and treatment behaviors. Methods The authors randomly selected 265 dentists in three states and assigned them to one of five groups: HIT workshop groups with and without tobacco-use cessation counseling reimbursement, LIT mailed self-study groups with and without reimbursement or a control group. Outcomes at follow-up were dentists’ self-reported tobacco-use–related attitudes and behaviors and patients’ reports of dentists’ behaviors. Results Significantly more dentists in the intervention groups reported having positive attitudes and behaviors at follow-up than did dentists in the control group. Dentists in the HIT groups, however, reported assessing patients’ willingness to quit and assisting them with the quitting process significantly more often than did dentists in the LIT groups. Significantly more patients of dentists in the intervention groups who used tobacco reported receiving advice and assistance from their dentists than did patients of dentists in the control group. Adding reimbursement to HIT or LIT conditions did not provide additional intervention effect. Conclusion Dentists trained by means of a workshop or self-study program used components of a recommended guideline more frequently and felt more positive toward tobacco-use cessation counseling than did dentists in the control group. Clinical Implications Although the workshop training was more successful than the self-study training, the latter’s reach among dentists could have a more significant public health impact. The effect of reimbursement needs further study.

No abstract

Smokeless tobacco use among athletes is alarming. Most of these athletes report beginning smokeless tobacco use in middle or high school. West Virginia has significantly higher rates of smokeless tobacco use among adolescent and adult males than the general population. Since West Virginia athletes may be particularly vulnerable to smokeless tobacco use, West Virginia coaches can be critical agents in smokeless tobacco prevention and intervention. This study surveyed West Virginia middle and high school coaches' 1) attitudes toward smokeless tobacco, 2) actions toward athletes who use smokeless tobacco, 3) intentions to provide intervention for users, and 4) tobacco use history. Results indicated coaches had unfavorable attitudes toward smokeless tobacco, perceived it as a problem, and were willing to help athletes quit. These findings provide support for development of training programs for middle and high school coaches to act as smokeless tobacco intervention agents.