Program Description: The miniseminar will consist of a lively panel discussion on the evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of sudden hearing loss. The panel will discuss the newly developed AAO-HNS clinical practice guideline. The primary purpose of the guideline is to improve the diagnosis and management of sudden hearing loss in adults aged 18 years and older. In creating this guideline the AAO-HNSF selected a panel representing the fields of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, audiology, otology, neurology, neurotology, family medicine, emergency medicine, and consumers. Educational Objectives: 1) Learn diagnostic criteria for sudden sensorineural hearing loss. 2) Plan treatment based on current best evidence from randomized, controlled trials. 3) Identify management and counseling strategies that improve quality of care.

This pilot study demonstrates a high prevalence (28%) of abnormal behavior in children undergoing T&A for chronic upper airway obstruction. Scores on a standardized measure of behavior improve following T&A, but larger studies with increased statistical power are needed to clarify the degree of improvement and its clinical importance.

acoustical implants. 3) Discuss a. a candid evaluation of the performance of the modiolar approximating electrodes; b. the ethics and utility of bilateral implantation; c. success and strategies for implanting higher order auditory pathways including the status of ABI and investigational methods; d. the utility of implantation of severe cochlear obstructions and malformations.

Certification in lifestyle medicine demonstrates that a physician has achieved a high level of knowledge, abilities, and skills in this area of specialization. Since the American Board of Lifestyle Medicine (ABLM) began certifying physicians in 2017 through January 2022, about 1850 U.S. diplomates have emerged, with an additional 1375 physicians certified in 72 countries in partnership with the International Board of Lifestyle Medicine. Certification by the ABLM is not only a source of personal pride and accomplishment, but facilitates practice growth, employment opportunities, leadership roles, career satisfaction, and credibility among consumers, the public, payors, and within health systems. In this commentary, we make the case for certification as an integral, and logical, corollary to the explosive growth of the lifestyle medicine as an increasingly relevant, and essential, part of mainstream medical practice.

IntroductionThe association of plant-based dietary patterns with health outcomes has traditionally been assessed without considering nutritional value. The plant-based dietary index (PDI), first published in 2016, overcomes this limitation with both a healthful PDI (hPDI) and an unhealthful PDI (uPDI), based on the quality of plant foods consumed plus the frequency of animal foods. We sought to summarize the breadth of research using the hPDI and uPDI to gain insight into how the quality of plant-based dietary patterns might be associated with health outcomes.MethodsScoping review of studies that used the PDI, hPDI, or uPDI to report associations with health outcomes. Multiple databases were searched from 2010 through April 2023 with 2 authors independently assessing eligibility and extracting data. In addition to assessing the association of the indices to health outcomes, we determined the frequency of concordant or discordant findings for hPDI versus PDI and for hPDI versus uPDI.ResultsWe included 95 articles (54% longitudinal, 37% cross-sectional, and 9% case–control) with a median sample size of 3,646. Higher hPDI levels were associated with favorable health outcomes in 36% of comparisons (most often for obesity, mortality, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and psychiatric disorders), compared to 25% for the PDI and only 2% for the uPDI. Conversely, higher levels of the uPDI were associated with unfavorable health outcomes in 33% of comparisons, in contrast to under 1% for the hPDI and 2% for the PDI. When the hPDI association to an outcome was discordant with the uPDI or PDI, the significance and directionality always favored the hPDI over the uPDI, and nearly always favored the hPDI over the PDI.DiscussionDietary indices that account for the quality of plant foods can show health benefits that might be missed by a generic plant-based index. A greater focus on the quality of plant foods could improve nutrition guidelines, raise awareness about the benefits of adding unrefined plant foods to the diet, and empower consumers to make incremental additions of such foods to displace unhealthy foods. We anticipate increasing use of indices that address food quality in future research.