OBJECTIVE -The Cockcroft-Gault (CG) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations previously have been recommended to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We compared both estimates with true GFR, measured by the isotopic 51 Cr-EDTA method, in newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -A total of 292 mainly normoalbuminuric (241 of 292) subjects were recruited. Subjects were classified as having mild renal impairment (group 1, GFR Ͻ90 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ) or normal renal function (group 2, GFR Ն90 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ). Estimated GFR (eGFR) was calculated by the CG and MDRD equations. Blood samples drawn at 44, 120, 180, and 240 min after administration of 1 MBq of 51 Cr-EDTA were used to measure isotopic GFR (iGFR).RESULTS -For subjects in group 1, mean (ϮSD) iGFR was 83.8 Ϯ 4.3 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . eGFR was 78.0 Ϯ 16.5 or 73.7 Ϯ 12.0 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 using CG and MDRD equations, respectively. Ninety-five percent CIs for method bias were -11.1 to Ϫ0.6 using CG and -14.4 to -7.0 using MDRD. Ninety-five percent limits of agreement (mean bias Ϯ 2 SD) were Ϫ37.2 to 25.6 and Ϫ33.1 to 11.7, respectively. In group 2, iGFR was 119.4 Ϯ 20.3 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . eGFR was 104.4 Ϯ 26.3 or 92.3 Ϯ 18.7 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 using CG and MDRD equations, respectively. Ninety-five percent CIs for method bias were -17.4 to -12.5 using CG and -29.1 to -25.1 using MDRD. Ninety-five percent limits of agreement were Ϫ54.4 to 24.4 and Ϫ59.5 to 5.3, respectively.CONCLUSIONS -In newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients, particularly those with a GFR Ն90 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , both CG and MDRD equations significantly underestimate iGFR. This highlights a limitation in the use of eGFR in the majority of diabetic subjects outside the setting of chronic kidney disease.
Diabetes Care 30:300 -305, 2007T he prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) continues to escalate at an alarming rate (1-3). In the U.K., the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has doubled in the past 10 years and this increase is projected to continue to rise at a rate of 5-8% per annum (2). In the U.S. in 2003, there were 325,000 individuals receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) at a cost of $18.1 billion per annum, 45% of these were diabetic patients (3). The number receiving RRT in the U.S. is anticipated to double by 2010 (4), clearly producing a significant economic burden. The number of patients with ESRD underestimates the entire burden of CKD. Whole-population screening surveys performed in Europe (5) and the U.S. (6) have identified that between 6 and 11% of this population have a degree of CKD; this number increases to 50 -60% when at risk groups are screened (6).Diabetes is the leading cause of ESRD in developed countries, accounting for 18 and 36% of new cases of RRT in the U.K. and Germany, respectively, in 2001 (7) and 45% of new cases in the U.S. in 2003 (3). Differences in incidence between developed countries are likely a reflection of racial and ethnic mix. In the U.S., ...