Similar to previous studies, an association between higher FFP:PRBC ratios at 24 hours and improved survival was observed. However, after adjustment for survival bias in the analysis, the association was no longer statistically significant. Prospective trials are necessary to evaluate whether hemostatic resuscitation is clinically beneficial.
Although laboratory studies indicate that female rodents better tolerate the deleterious consequences of trauma and have higher survival rates than male rodents, it remains unclear whether a similar gender dimorphic pattern is evident in humans. In view of this, the association between gender and mortality in trauma patients admitted to a University Level I Trauma Center was assessed. All adult patients admitted to the University of Alabama at Birmingham Trauma Center with blunt or penetrating injury between July 1996 and March 2001 were selected for analysis. Patients were categorized by mechanism (blunt or penetrating), and odds ratios (ORs) were used to compare the risk of death among males compared with females. The ORs were stratified according to age and were adjusted for demographic, medical, and injury characteristics. Male blunt trauma patients <50 years old had a 2.5 times (95% CI 1.3-4.9) higher risk of death than females; however, for those > or = 50 years old, a smaller, nonstatistically significant difference was apparent (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.8-2.3). Conversely, for penetrating trauma, males <50 years old exhibited an increased yet nonsignificant risk of death (OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.6-5.4), whereas those > or = 50 years old had a survival advantage (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.02-0.5). Laboratory studies have demonstrated that estrogens are salutary and androgens are detrimental for survival following trauma-hemorrhage. The results of this study suggest that the physiologic pattern of premenopausal adult female sex hormones may provide a survival advantage in blunt trauma patients; however, the converse pattern prevails for the penetrating trauma patients.
This study found an association between gender and mortality among blunt trauma patients, particularly those aged > or = 50 years. Animal studies demonstrate that the sex hormones influence the inflammatory response to injury. These results may highlight the importance of sex hormones in traumatic injury outcomes.
Clinical and experimental studies have shown a decreased mortality for women after nonthermal injury. However, recently published data from this institution showed an increased mortality for female patients younger than 60 years of age with thermal injury. This study extended these observations to evaluate outcomes related to sex in thermal injury in a larger population of patients. The National Burn Repository (NBR) was used for this analysis. Patients admitted to burn centers between 1991 and 2001 were selected for inclusion (n = 49,079). Sex differences in demographic, injury, clinical, and outcome characteristics were compared. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the association between mortality and sex, both overall and stratified by age. In total, 34,470 men and 14,609 women were included in this study. Women had a 50% increased risk of death when compared with men (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.3-1.6), which diminished slightly when adjustments were made for age, race, TBSA burn, and inhalation injury (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.5). When stratified by age, women had an increased risk of death for all age groups between 10 and 70 years. This study confirmed earlier studies showing an association between sex and burn mortality. Further prospective studies analyzing differences in immune responses between men and women after burn injury may provide insight into the mechanism behind these divergent outcomes and identify targets for future therapy.
Clinical and experimental studies have demonstrated higher mortality following nonthermal trauma among males compared with females. To date, few clinical retrospective studies have focused on gender differences in outcome following burn injury with respect to age. All patients admitted to the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Burn Center between January 1994 and December 2000 were selected for inclusion in the study. Gender differences in demographic, clinical, and outcome characteristics were compared. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the association between mortality and gender, both overall and stratified by age. Over the 7-year study period, 1229 males and 382 females were admitted to the UAB Burn Center, and mortality rates were 7.2% and 13.4%, respectively (P = 0.0002). Female patients were more likely to be older, of the black race, and in poorer health. In addition, females were more likely to suffer flame and scald burns. The association between mortality and gender was modified by age. Up to age 60, mortality rates among females were over twice that of males (OR 2.3, 95% Cl 1.4-3.8); however, no difference was noted among those 60 and older (OR 0.9, 95% Cl 0.5-1.6). These associations persisted following adjustment for potentially confounding variables. Causes and timing of death were similar for males and females. Women less than 60 years of age who sustain burn injuries have an increased risk of death compared with males. Differences in the natural history of nonthermal trauma and burn injury may provide insight regarding these divergent findings.
Incorporating the Wittmann Patch into a clinical pathway for management of the open abdomen has contributed to an increased incidence of delayed fascial closure. Abdominal complications were similar in both groups, suggesting that the device is not only efficacious, but also relatively safe.
Management of colonic wounds in the setting of DCL is associated with a relatively high incidence of complications. The excessive incidence of leak overall and morbidity particular to resection and anastomosis, however, give us pause. Although stoma construction is not without its own complications in the setting of DCL, it may be the safer alternative.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.