In September 2006, members of the Sex, Gender and Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain met to discuss the following: (1) what is known about sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia; (2) what are the "best practice" guidelines for pain research with respect to sex and gender; and (3) what are the crucial questions to address in the near future? The resulting consensus presented herein includes input from basic science, clinical and psychosocial pain researchers, as well as from recognized experts in sexual differentiation and reproductive endocrinology. We intend this document to serve as a utilitarian and thought-provoking guide for future research on sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia, both for those currently working in this field as well as those still wondering, "Do I really need to study females?" Keywords Sex differences; Gonadal hormones; Estrogens The case for studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesiaThe pain field has moved from debating whether sex differences in pain exist to recognizing the importance of these differences. Attention is now directed toward understanding (1) what conditions lead to the expression of sex and gender differences in pain experience and reactivity, (2) what mechanisms underlie these differences, and (3) how these differences can inform clinical management of pain.As noted in a recent review, at least 79% of animal studies published in Pain over the preceding 10 years included male subjects only, with a mere 8% of studies on females only, and another 4% explicitly designed to test for sex differences (the rest did not specify) [142]. Given the substantially greater prevalence of many clinical pain conditions in women vs. men [20,199], and growing evidence for sex differences in sensitivity to experimental pain and to analgesics [21,41,213], we recommend that all pain researchers consider testing their hypotheses in both sexes, or if restricted by practical considerations, only in females. It is invalid to assume that data obtained in male subjects will generalize to females, and the best non-human model of the modal human pain sufferer -a woman -is a female animal. If only males are examined in a given study, it is important that a rationale for exclusion of females be provided and that the potential limitation in generalizability of the findings be addressed in the discussion, particularly when examining a pain phenomenon that occurs with greater prevalence or severity in females. In both preclinical and clinical studies, a comparison of both sexes will further our understanding of individual differences in sensitivity to pain and analgesia, thus improving our ability to treat and prevent pain in all people. General considerationsTwo issues of terminology are important. First, the term "sex" refers to biologically based differences, while the term "gender" refers to socially based phenomena. Although biological sex exerts a major influence on one's gender identity, sex and gender a...

Visceral pain is a prevalent clinical problem and one of the most common ailments for which patients seek medical attention. Recent studies have described many of the physiological properties of visceral afferents, but not much is known regarding their anatomical characteristics. To determine the spinal distribution and neurochemical phenotype of colonic afferents in rodents, Alexa Fluor-conjugated cholera toxin-beta (CTB) was injected subserosally into the proximal and distal portions of the descending colon in Sprague Dawley rats and C57Bl/6 mice. Dorsal root ganglia (T10-S2) were processed for fluorescent immunohistochemistry and visualized by confocal microscopy. In the mouse, CTB-positive neurons were most numerous in the lumbosacral region (LS; L6-S1), with a smaller contribution in the thoracolumbar ganglia (TL; T13-L1). In contrast, CTB-positive neurons in the rat were most numerous in the TL ganglia, with a smaller contribution in the LS ganglia. The vast majority of CTB-positive neurons in both mouse and rat were positive for TRPV1 and CGRP and most likely unmyelinated, in that most colonic afferents were not positive for neurofilament heavy chain. In the mouse, the TL ganglia had a significantly higher percentage of TRPV1- and CGRP-positive neurons than did the LS ganglia, whereas no differences were observed in the rat. The high incidence of TRPV1-positive colonic afferents in rodents suggests that hypersensitivity from the viscera may be partially a TRPV1-mediated event, thereby providing a suitable target for the treatment of visceral pain.

We have physiologically characterized the receptive field properties of lamina I projection neurons with cutaneous input in the lumbar spinal cords of control rats and rats with unilateral adjuvant-induced inflammation of the hindlimb. The majority of cells recorded in rats with inflamed limbs demonstrated properties uncharacteristic of this cell population in control rats, including large receptive fields, discontinuous receptive fields, responsiveness to deep as well as cutaneous tissues and ongoing or bursting spontaneous activity. Cells with complex receptive fields were encountered from less than 6 h to 5 days after induction of inflammation. This time course correlates with the occurrence of hyperalgesia to thermal stimuli. The contributions of nociceptive afferent sensitization and alterations in the physical environment of peripheral receptors to the observed enlargement of receptive fields were examined by testing the responses of cells to localized electrical and thermal stimuli in the absence and presence of local anesthesia. Nociceptive primary afferents did not demonstrate enlarged receptive fields in this model of inflammation. The results imply that the enlargement of receptive fields cannot be accounted for by peripheral sensitization of peripheral nociceptors or physical changes in the environment of peripheral receptors and must therefore involve changes within the central nervous system.

Many gastrointestinal pain syndromes are more prevalent in women than men, suggesting a gonadal steroid influence. We characterized the effects of estrogen on two responses to colorectal distention (CRD) in the rat: the visceromotor reflex (vmr) and L6-S1 dorsal horn neuron activity (ABRUPT and SUSTAINED neurons). Ovariectomized rats were injected with estrogen, and responses to innocuous and noxious intensities of CRD were measured between 4 hr and 14 d after injection and compared with ovariectomized and intact, cycling rats. Plasma estrogen levels were determined at each time point. Ovariectomy significantly decreased the magnitude of the vmr and ABRUPT neuron response to CRD compared with cycling rats. Four and 48 hr after estrogen injection (10 microg), the magnitude of the vmr and ABRUPT neuron response returned to the level or greater than that of cycling rats. All responses were comparable with ovariectomized rats by 7 d. These results paralleled the plasma estrogen concentration. Fifty micrograms of estrogen did not further increase the magnitude of the vmr or neuronal response 48 hr after estrogen but did extend the period of the increased ABRUPT neuron response to 14 d. Estrogen did not affect the response of SUSTAINED neurons. In a separate experiment, the response to innocuous CRD was sensitized in estrogen-treated rats but not ovariectomized or cycling rats. The present data suggest that estrogen modulates the spinal cord processing and reflex responses to innocuous and noxious colorectal stimuli in female rats and may contribute to alterations in sensory processing associated with irritable bowel syndrome.