Compensatory mitigation for damages to wetlands in the United States occurs largely without explicit analysis and replacement of wetland functions. We offer an approach to standardize such analyses and strengthen the connection between ecologica! principles and policies for wetland resources. By establishing standards from reference wetlands chosen for their high level of sustainable functioning, gains and losses of functions can be quantified for wetlands used in compensatory mitigation. Advantages of a reference wetland approach include (1) making explicit the goals of compensatory mitigation through identification of reference standards from data that typify sustainable conditions in a region, (2) providing templates to which restored and created wetlands can be designed, and (3) establishing a framework whereby a decline in functions resulting from adverse impacts or a recovery of functions following restoration can be estimated both for a single project and over a larger area accumulated over time.To establish reference standards, conditions inherent to highly functioning sites must be identified for classes of wetlands that share similar geomorphic settings. Ecologica! functions are then identified, and variables used to model the functions are employed in developing reference standards. Variables range from the highest levels of sustainable functioning to the complete absence of functions when a wetland ecosystem is displaced. An example given for wet pîne flats in the North Carolina coasta! plain illustrates how to determine the loss of a given function for an impacted wetland, how to calculate recovery (gains) in function through compensatory mitigation, and how to use the relationships between the two (loss vs. gain in function) to set minimum replacement ratios of restored to impacted area. In ali cases, data from reference wetlands provide the benchmarks for making these estimates and for directing restoration or creation of wetlands toward the standards established for the wetland class. Programs to implement the use of reference wetlands require regional efforts that build upon the knowledge base of existing wetlands and their functioning.
Attributes of 25 headwater streams and their associated wetlands were quantitatively sampled in the inner coastal plain of eastern North Carolina. Data from these sites were used to construct and test one functional assessment model (biogeochemical cycling) using the hydrogeomorphic (HGM) approach. Of the 25 sites sampled, 16 unaltered sites were used to establish standards against which field indicators could be compared (indexed). Nine altered sites were used to examine the sensitivity of the model to assess the types of alterations typically inflicted upon headwater ecosystems in eastern North Carolina: channelization, logging, construction of cross‐floodplain ditches to shunt water directly from uplands to the main stream channel, and conversion of stream floodplains and buffer zones to cropland. Of 30 field indicators measured that potentially could be used to model alterations to hydrologic regime and biomass stocks, we found six were robust in assessing conditions related to biogeochemical cycling. Hydrologic indicators used in the model included: (1) presence/absence of channelization, (2) presence/absence of cross‐floodplain ditches, and (3) a measure of buffer condition (using width and quality). Biomass indicators included: (4) total basal area of trees, (5) percent litter cover, and (6) volume of coarse woody debris. Our preliminary biogeochemical cycling model using these six variables was sensitive to alterations in nine altered sites and to a suite of hypothetical restorations of the most altered site. However, in order to improve accuracy of our preliminary model, it should be validated with studies designed to measure how alterations of various types and magnitudes affect biogeochemical processes.
This study demonstrates an approach for rapidly collecting quantitative field data on reference wetland sites and using those data to assess functions (ecological processes) in wetlands. We demonstrate the hydrogeomorphic (HGM) assessment procedure by identifying ecological functions performed by mineral soil wet fiats, obtaining quantitative field data from 19 wet fiats (reference sites) in southeastern North Carolina, and modeling wetland functions using variables derived from those field data. We chose a subset of the 19 reference sites to demonstrate how HGM assessment can be used to measure ecosystem functions before and after a project site is altered and the degree to which ecosystem restoration can compensate for a reduction in functions caused by a project's impact.We also illustrate how HGM assessment can be used to determine the minimum area over which restoration should be applied to achieve a no-net-loss in function objective. This minimum area can be determined by dividing the degree to which a function is reduced through project alteration by the degree to which a function is increased through restoration. The ratio of wetland area restored to wetland area altered by a project impact (compensatory mitigation ratio) varies among functions and is influenced by (1) the magnitude to which any given function occurs at a project site both before and after the site is altered, (2) the magnitude to which any given function occurs at a compensatory mitigation site both before and after restoration is applied, and (3) the rate at which any given function is restored.
We propose a regional classification for wetlands of the Mid-Atlantic region, USA. It combines functional characteristics recognized by the hydrogeomorphic (HGM) approach with the established classification of the National Wetland Inventory (NWI). The HGM approach supplements the NWI classification by recognizing the importance of geomorphic setting, water sources, and flow dynamics that are key to functioning wetlands. Both NWI and HGM share at their highest levels the Marine, Estuarine, and Lacustrine classes. This classification departs from the NWI system by subdividing the Palustrine system into HGM classes of Slope, Depression, and Flat. Further, the Riverine class expands to include associated Palustrine wetlands, thus recognizing the interdependency between channel and floodplain. Deepwater habitats of NWI are not included because they differ functionally. Mid-Atlantic regional subclasses recognize two subclasses each for Flat, Slope, and Marine Tidal Fringe; three subclasses for Depression; four subclasses for Lacustrine Fringe and Estuarine Tidal Fringe, and five subclasses for Riverine. Taking a similar approach in other geographic regions will better characterize wetlands for assessment and restoration. This approach was applied successfully during a regional wetlands condition assessment. We encourage additional testing by others to confirm its utility in the region.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.