ZusammenfassungDer Beitrag beleuchtet die Funktion von Reallaboren als Rahmen für transformative und transdisziplinäre Forschung. Dazu wird zuerst ein Verständnis von Reallaboren vorgelegt, das auf der Reflexion praktischer Erfahrungen von Reallaboren in Baden-Württemberg beruht. Ausgangspunkt hierfür ist ein Verständnis von Reallaboren als Infrastruktur für Realexperimente und andere transdisziplinäre Projekte. Aufbauend auf diesem Verständnis werden die Ziele der Reallaborarbeit in drei Dimensionen, den Forschungs-, Praxis- und Bildungszielen beschrieben. Um einen solchen Rahmen herzustellen und zu pflegen, werden fünf Designprinzipien vorgeschlagen: Problem- und Themenangemessenheit herstellen, räumliche Angemessenheit gestalten, zeitliche Angemessenheit herstellen, angemessene Akteursrollen etablieren sowie experimentell-reflexive Arbeitsweise fördern. Den Abschluss bildet ein Schema aus Zieldimensionen und Designprinzipien, das bei der Ausgestaltung von Reallaboren als Hilfestellung dienen soll, das aber auch als Reflexionsschema verwendet werden kann.

Cities worldwide are rising to the challenge of sustainable development, calling for large-scale and fastpaced transformations towards sustainability. Urban sustainability challenges are now being reframed as a lack of capacity of individuals and organizations to carry out such socio-technical transformations. This article expands on transformative capacity literature by elucidating the concept of actor-centric transformative capacity. It focuses on the unique role city-university partnerships (CUPs) can play in catalyzing and supporting effective urban sustainability transformations. Two case studies on CUPs in Portland, Oregon and Tempe, Arizona are used to identify determinants of actor-centric transformative capacity, their role in the transformative capacity of urban systems, and how they are built through CUPs. The article concludes with strategies for building effective CUPs capable of building actor-centric transformative capacity among university actors and city administrators.

Real-world laboratories (RwLs) are a form of transdisciplinary research that facilitates learning processes as part of its transformative objectives. Nevertheless, little conceptual effort has been put into the understanding, planning, and evaluation of the learning dimension of RwL work. This paper applies a systematic approach from the discourse on education for sustainable development (ESD) to differentiate three perspectives on the various learning processes occurring in RwLs and exemplifies them with experiences from the RwL Urban Transition Lab 131 in Karlsruhe.

Abstract:The urgency of climate change and other sustainability challenges makes transferring and scaling solutions between cities a necessity. However, solutions are deeply contextual. To accelerate solution efforts, there is a need to understand how context shapes the development of solutions. Universities are well positioned to work with cities on transferring solutions from and to other cities. This paper analyses five case studies of city-university partnerships in three countries on transferring solutions. Our analysis suggests that understanding the interest, the action on sustainability, and the individual and collective sustainability competences on the part of the city administration and the university can help facilitate the transfer of sustainability solutions across contexts. We conclude that the nature of the city-university partnership is essential to solution transfer and that new and existing networks can be used to accelerate progress on the 2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

Since the early days of the emerging research format of Real-world Labs (RwLs), higher education plays a vital role in them. Examples have been presented on teaching activities in RwLs, but the reasons for and evidence of their inclusion stays limited. To start a systematic discussion on the embedding of higher education in RwLs, this paper presents the case of six Transdisciplinary Project Courses carried out in the RwL “District Future—Urban Lab” in Karlsruhe/Germany. The paper presents the discourses on the role of learning in RwLs and compares it to those on Transition Labs and Urban Living Labs. To offer a new approach to address this aspect, the paper introduces a social practice perspective to map out the interrelations between an RwL and higher education therein. The detailed analysis of the processes is used to identify the potential of the RwL to support learning. It shows that all dimensions of social practice can be identified in the interplay between Real-world Lab and Transdisciplinary Project Courses, even though to a very different degree and in different phases. The text closes with lessons learned for teaching project courses in RwLs and similar labs.

Both sustainability and education are challenging process-oriented objectives. When the aim is to combine both notions, as in Higher Education in Sustainability (HES), it is indispensable to first establish a common ground between them. In this paper, we characterise this common ground in terms of four aspects: future orientation, normativity, global perspective, and theory engaged in practice. Based on an analysis of the common ground, one method that is well-established in a wide range of sustainability sciences shows high potential for use in HES because it covers all four aspects in detail: the scenario method. We argue that a didactical reconstruction of the scenario method is necessary to utilise its potential and develop adequate forms of teaching in higher education. The scenario method is used to construct and analyse a set of alternative future developments to support decisions that have to be made in the present. Didactical reconstruction reveals a spectrum of objectives for which the scenario method can be employed: (1) projection; (2) teleological planning and (3) an explorative search for possibilities not yet considered. By studying and experimenting with this spectrum of objectives, students in HES can develop fundamental reflexive competencies in addressing the future in different ways that are relevant for both sustainability and education.

Reallabore sind in der Forschungslandschaft inzwischen sehr populär. Das Format steckt aber immer noch im Anfangsstadium, ist selbst noch mehr Experiment denn Labor. So fehlen Reallaboren häufig eine langfristige Perspektive sowie eine gleichberechtigte Unterstützung aus Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft. Das sich im Aufbau befindende Karlsruher Transformationszentrum zeigt, wie diese Schwächen behoben werden und Reallabore langfristig sozial-ökologische Transformationen gestalten können.

No abstract