Most great ape genetic variation remains uncharacterized; however,\ud its study is critical for understanding population history, recombination,\ud selection and susceptibility to disease.Herewe sequence\ud to high coverage a total of 79 wild- and captive-born individuals\ud representing all six great ape species and seven subspecies and report\ud 88.8 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. Our analysis provides\ud support for genetically distinct populations within each species,\ud signals of gene flow, and the split of common chimpanzees\ud into two distinct groups: Nigeria–Cameroon/western and central/\ud eastern populations.We find extensive inbreeding in almost all wild\ud populations, with eastern gorillas being the most extreme. Inferred\ud effective population sizes have varied radically over timein different\ud lineages and this appears to have a profound effect on the genetic\ud diversity at, or close to, genes in almost all species. We discover and\ud assign 1,982 loss-of-function variants throughout the human and\ud great ape lineages, determining that the rate of gene loss has not\ud been different in the human branch compared to other internal\ud branches in the great ape phylogeny. This comprehensive catalogue\ud of great ape genomediversity provides a framework for understanding\ud evolution and a resource for more effective management of wild\ud and captive great ape populations

No abstract

Recently developed methods of individual-based analysis of genetic data allow an unprecedented opportunity to understand the relationships among fragmented populations. By defining population structure and identifying migrant individuals, such analyses can provide a framework to aid in evaluating the threats posed by inbreeding and reduced genetic variability as a consequence of limited gene flow among fragments. Here we investigate population structure in the critically endangered Cross River gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli) by applying a suite of individual-based analyses to data obtained from between one-quarter and one-third of the estimated total population through the use of noninvasively collected DNA samples. The population structure inferred using data from 11 autosomal microsatellite loci was broadly consistent with geography and habitat fragmentation, but showed no simple isolation-by-distance effects. In contrast to previous field surveys, which suggested that all gorilla localities were isolated from one another, we infer low levels of gene flow and identify migrants between habitat fragments as well as individuals of admixed ancestry, suggesting persistent recent reproductive contact between many of the localities. These results are encouraging for the conservation of the Cross River gorilla population. Conservation efforts should strive to maintain connectivity between subpopulations that are still in migratory contact and attempt to restore connectivity where it has been lost.