In the present paper, we establish sharp Sobolev estimates for solutions of fully nonlinear parabolic equations, under minimal, asymptotic, assumptions on the governing operator. In particular, we prove that solutions are in W 2,1;p loc . Our argument unfolds by importing improved regularity from a limiting configuration. In this concrete case, we recur to the recession function associated with F. This machinery allows us to impose conditions solely on the original operator at the infinity of S(d). From a heuristic viewpoint, integral regularity would be set by the behavior of F at the ends of that space. Moreover, we explore a number of consequences of our findings, and develop some related results; these include a parabolic version of Escauriaza's exponent, a universal modulus of continuity for the solutions and estimates in p − BMO spaces.
We consider the following fractional reaction-diffusion equation
u
t
(
t
)
+
∂
t
∫
0
t
g
α
(
s
)
A
u
(
t
−
s
)
d
s
=
t
γ
f
(
u
)
,
$$ u_t(t) + \partial_t \int\nolimits_{0}^{t} g_{\alpha}(s) \mathcal{A} u(t-s) ds = t^{\gamma} f(u),$$
where g
α
(t) = t
α−1/Γ(α) (0 < α < 1), f ∈ C([0, ∞)) is a non-decreasing function, γ > −1, and
A
$\mathcal{A}$
is an elliptic operator whose fundamental solution of its associated parabolic equation has Gaussian lower and upper bounds. We characterize the behavior of the functions f so that the above fractional reaction-diffusion equation has a bounded local solution in L
r
(Ω), for non-negative initial data u
0 ∈ L
r
(Ω), when r > 1 and Ω ⊂ ℝ
N
is either a smooth bounded domain or the whole space ℝ
N
. The case r = 1 is also studied.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.