Acceptance criteria of deceased donor organs have gradually been extended toward suboptimal quality, posing an urgent need for more objective pretransplant organ assessment. Ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could assist clinicians in deciding whether a donor kidney is suitable for transplantation. Aim of this study was to characterize the regional distribution of perfusate flow during NMP, to better understand how ex vivo kidney assessment protocols should eventually be designed. Nine porcine and 4 human discarded kidneys underwent 3 h of NMP in an MRI-compatible perfusion setup. Arterial spin labeling scans were performed every 15 min, resulting in perfusion-weighted images that visualize intrarenal flow distribution. At the start of NMP, all kidneys were mainly centrally perfused and it took time for the outer cortex to reach its physiological dominant perfusion state. Calculated corticomedullary ratios based on the perfusion maps reached a physiological range comparable to in vivo observations, but only after 1 to 2 h after the start of NMP. Before that, the functionally important renal cortex appeared severely underperfused. Our findings suggest that early functional NMP quality assessment markers may not reflect actual physiology and should therefore be interpreted with caution.
Kidney transplantation has developed into a widespread procedure to treat end stage renal failure, with transplantation results improving over the years. Postoperative complications have decreased over the past decades, but are still an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Early accurate diagnosis and treatment is the key to prevent renal allograft impairment or even graft loss. Ideally, a diagnostic tool should be able to detect post-transplant renal dysfunction, differentiate between the different causes and monitor renal function during and after therapeutic interventions. Non-invasive imaging modalities for diagnostic purposes show promising results. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques have a number of advantages, such as the lack of ionizing radiation and the possibility to obtain relevant tissue information without contrast, reducing the risk of contrast-induced nephrotoxicity. However, most techniques still lack the specificity to distinguish different types of parenchymal diseases. Despite some promising outcomes, MRI is still barely used in the post-transplantation diagnostic process. The aim of this review is to survey the current literature on the relevance and clinical applicability of diagnostic MRI modalities for the detection of various types of complications after kidney transplantation.
Background
To ensure optimal utilization of deceased donor kidneys, it is important to understand the precise reasons why kidneys are discarded. In this study, we aimed to obtain a comprehensive overview of kidney utilization and discard during the entire donation process in the Netherlands.
Methods
In this retrospective cohort study we analyzed kidney utilization of 3856 kidneys in the Netherlands between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020. For every kidney that was not transplanted, we determined the moment of and reason for discard through a unique case-by-case assessment.
Results
Kidney discard according to the traditional definition (procured but not transplanted) was 7.8%. However, when kidneys that seemed medically suitable at the beginning of the donation process were also included, many more potential donor kidneys were lost and the total non-utilization was 24.4%. Subjectively presumed impaired organ quality was responsible for 34.2% of all discarded kidneys. Two-thirds of kidneys discarded due to acute kidney injury (AKI), had only AKI stage 1 or 2.
Conclusion
The classical definition of organ discard underestimates the non-utilization of deceased donor kidneys. Strategies to improve kidney utilization could be a revision of the maximum allowed agonal time in donation after circulatory death, careful consideration in reporting and accepting kidneys from donors with AKI, and a prospectively filled registry of detailed organ discard reasons, including the ‘silent’ non-utilization before procurement.
Background
The shortage of donor organs for transplantation remains a worldwide problem. The utilization of suboptimal deceased donors enlarges the pool of potential organs, yet consequently, clinicians face the difficult decision of whether these sub‐optimal organs are of sufficient quality for transplantation. Novel technologies could play a pivotal role in making pre‐transplant organ assessment more objective and reliable.
Methods
Ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) at temperatures around 35–37°C allows organ quality assessment in a near‐physiological environment. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques convey unique information about an organ's structural and functional integrity. The concept of applying magnetic resonance imaging during renal normothermic machine perfusion is novel in both renal and radiological research and we have developed the first MRI‐compatible NMP setup for human‐sized kidneys.
Results
We were able to obtain a detailed and real‐time view of ongoing processes inside renal grafts during ex vivo perfusion. This new technique can visualize structural abnormalities, quantify regional flow distribution, renal metabolism, and local oxygen availability, and track the distribution of ex vivo administered cellular therapy.
Conclusion
This platform allows for advanced pre‐transplant organ assessment, provides a new realistic tool for studies into renal physiology and metabolism, and may facilitate therapeutic tracing of pharmacological and cellular interventions to an isolated kidney.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.