Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88: 496-498 496Urethral dilatation has been advocated as empirical treatment for adult women with lower urinary tract complaints for long time. The discovery of a distal urethral ring by Lyon and associates led to the hypothesis that urethral stenosis was the cause of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) and dysfunctional voiding in girls. 1 It was postulated that rupture of this ring by dilatation would relieve the obstruction. Kerr and associates decided on cutting this contraction ring with the otis urethrotome rather than dilating it with sounds.2 At the same time, they extended this procedure to include adult female patients.Although reviewing the literature reveals little solid evidence regarding the theoretical basis of this practice, several reports suggest that urologists are still practising urethral dilatation as treatment for a variety of complaints that are not efficiently managed by other means.To this end, we conducted a study to establish and report the results of an anonymous survey about urologists' practice patterns and attitudes towards the use of urethral dilatation in adult women with lower urinary tract complaints. Materials and MethodsAn 8-item questionnaire was mailed to 428 consultant urologists listed as full members of the British Association of Urological Surgeons. The questionnaire focused on assessing the relative indications of performing urethral dilatation by urologists, perceived effectiveness, frequency of using the procedure, the need for repeated dilatation, form of anaesthesia used and the maximum size of dilators to be used. Consultants were asked to state how long it was since they were appointed as consultant urologists. ResultsA total of 176 urologists completed and returned the questionnaire (response rate 42%), of which 171 returns were considered for evaluation (5 consultants reported that they never offer their patients dilatation). The results of the survey are listed in the Appendix.Although 12% of urologists believe urethral stenosis is the only indication for dilatation, it was the most common
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.