Gastric cancer is the high mortality rate cancers globally, and the current survival rate is 30% even with the use of combination therapies. Recently, mounting evidence indicates the potential role of miRNAs in the diagnosis and assessing the prognosis of cancers. In the state-of-art research in cancer, machine-learning (ML) has gained increasing attention to find clinically useful biomarkers. The present study aimed to identify potential diagnostic and prognostic miRNAs in GC with the application of ML. Using the TCGA database and ML algorithms such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, k-NN, etc., a panel of 29 was obtained. Among the ML algorithms, SVM was chosen (AUC:88.5%, Accuracy:93% in GC). To find common molecular mechanisms of the miRNAs, their common gene targets were predicted using online databases such as miRWalk, miRDB, and Targetscan. Functional and enrichment analyzes were performed using Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Database of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), as well as identification of protein–protein interactions (PPI) using the STRING database. Pathway analysis of the target genes revealed the involvement of several cancer-related pathways including miRNA mediated inhibition of translation, regulation of gene expression by genetic imprinting, and the Wnt signaling pathway. Survival and ROC curve analysis showed that the expression levels of hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-133a, hsa-miR-146b, and hsa-miR-29c were associated with higher mortality and potentially earlier detection of GC patients. A panel of dysregulated miRNAs that may serve as reliable biomarkers for gastric cancer were identified using machine learning, which represents a powerful tool in biomarker identification.

Background: Stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) is common cancer with poor clinical outcomes globally. Due to a lack of early diagnostic markers of disease, the majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Objective: The aim of the present study is to provide some new insights into the available biomarkers for patients with STAD using bioinformatics. Methods: RNA-Sequencing and other relevant data of patients with STAD from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were evaluated to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Then, machine learning algorithms were undertaken to predict biomarkers. Additionally, Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to detect prognostic biomarkers. Furthermore, the Gene Ontology and Reactome pathways, protein-protein interactions (PPI), multiple sequence alignment, phylogenetic mapping, and correlation between clinical parameters were evaluated. Results: The results demonstrated 61 DEGs, and the key dysregulated genes associated with STAD are MTHFD1L (Methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 1-like), ZWILCH (Zwilch Kinetochore Protein), RCC2 (Regulator of chromosome condensation 2), DPT (Dermatopontin), GCOM1 (GRINL1A complex locus 1), and CLEC3B (C-Type Lectin Domain Family 3 Member B). Moreover, the survival analysis reported ASPA (Aspartoacylase) as a prognostic marker. Conclusion: Our study provides a proof of concept of the potential value of ASPA as a prognostic factor in STAD, requiring further functional investigations to explore the value of emerging markers. other: n/a

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a very poor prognosis. Therefore, there has been a focus on the identification of new biomarkers for the early diagnosis of PDAC and prediction of patient survival. Genome-wide RNA and microRNA sequencing were used using bioinformatics and Machine Learning approaches to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) followed by validation in additional cohort of PDAC patients. Methods: genome RNA sequencing and clinical data from pancreatic cancer patients were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas Database (TCGA) to identify DEGs. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival curves was used to assess prognostic biomarkers. Ensemble learning, Random Forest, (RF), Max Voting, Adaboost, Gradient boosting machines (GBM) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) techniques were used and Gradient boosting machines (GBM) were selected with 100 % accuracy for analysis. Moreover, protein-protein interaction (PPI), molecular pathways, concomitant expression of DEGs, and correlations between DEGs and clinical data were analyzed. We have evaluated candidate genes, miRNAs and a combination of these obtained from machine learning algorithms and survival analysis. Results: Machine learning results showed 23 genes with negative regulation, 5 genes with positive regulation, 7 microRNAs with negative regulation and 20 microRNAs with positive regulation in PDAC. Key genes BMF, FRMD4A, ADAP2, PPP1R17, and CACNG3 had the highest coefficient in the advanced stages of disease. In addition, the survival analysis results showed decreased expression of hsa.miR.642a, hsa.mir.363, CD22, BTNL9 and CTSW and overexpression of hsa.miR.153.1, hsa.miR.539, hsa.miR.412 reduced survival rate. CTSW was identified as a novel genetic marker and this was validated using RT-PCR. Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms may be used to Identify key dysregulated genes/miRNAs involved in pathogenesis of the diseases can be used for detection of patients in earlier stages. Our data also demonstrated the prognostic and diagnostic value of CTSW in PDAC.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths. The five-year relative survival rate for CRC is estimated to be approximately 90% for patients diagnosed with early stages and 14% for those diagnosed at an advanced stages of disease, respectively. Hence, the development of accurate prognostic markers is required. Bioinformatics enables the identification of dysregulated pathways and novel biomarkers. RNA expression profiling was performed in CRC patients from the TCGA database using a Machine Learning approach to identify differential expression genes (DEGs). Survival curves were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis to identify prognostic biomarkers. Furthermore, the molecular pathways, protein-protein interaction, the co-expression of DEGs, and the correlation between DEGs and clinical data have been evaluated. The diagnostic markers were then determined based on machine learning analysis. The results indicated that key upregulated genes are associated with the RNA processing and heterocycle metabolic process, including C10orf2, NOP2, DKC1, BYSL, RRP12, PUS7, MTHFD1L, and PPAT. Furthermore, the survival analysis identified NOP58, OSBPL3, DNAJC2, and ZMYND19 as prognostic markers. The combineROC curve analysis indicated that the combination of C10orf2 -PPAT-ZMYND19 can be considered as diagnostic markers with sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values of 0.98, 1.00, and 0.99, respectively. Eventually, ZMYND19 gene was validated in CRC patients. In conclusion, novel biomarkers of CRC have been identified that may be a promising strategy for early diagnosis, potential treatment, and better prognosis.