Tungsten tetraboride (WB 4 ) is an interesting candidate as a less expensive member of the growing group of superhard transition metal borides. WB 4 was successfully synthesized by arc melting from the elements. Characterization using powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) indicates that the as-synthesized material is phase pure. The zeropressure bulk modulus, as measured by high-pressure X-ray diffraction for WB 4 , is 339 GPa. Mechanical testing using microindentation gives a Vickers hardness of 43.3 AE 2.9 GPa under an applied load of 0.49 N. Various ratios of rhenium were added to WB 4 in an attempt to increase hardness. With the addition of 1 at.% Re, the Vickers hardness increased to approximately 50 GPa at 0.49 N. Powders of tungsten tetraboride with and without 1 at.% Re addition are thermally stable up to approximately 400°C in air as measured by thermal gravimetric analysis.dispersion hardening | indentation hardness | intrinsic hardness | nano-indentation hardness | solid solutions I n many manufacturing processes, materials must be cut, formed, or drilled, and their surfaces protected with wearresistant coatings. Diamond has traditionally been the material of choice for these shaping operations, due to its superior mechanical properties (e.g., hardness > 70 GPa) (1, 2). However, diamond is rare in nature and difficult to synthesize artificially due to the need for a combination of high temperature and high pressure. Industrial applications of diamond are thus generally limited by cost. Moreover, diamond is not a good option for high-speed cutting of ferrous alloys due to its graphitization on the material's surface and formation of brittle carbides, which leads to poor cutting performance (3). Other hard or superhard (hardness ≥ 40 GPa) substitutes for diamond include compounds of light elements such as cubic boron nitride (4) and BC 2 N (5) or transition metals combined with light elements such as WC (6), HfN (7), and TiN (8). Although the compounds of the first group (B, C, or N) possess high hardness, their synthesis requires high pressure and high temperature and is thus nontrivial (9, 10). On the other hand, most of the compounds of the second group (transition metal-light elements) are not superhard although their synthesis is more straightforward.To overcome the shortcomings of diamond and its substitutes, we have been pursuing the synthesis of dense transition metal borides, which combine high hardness with synthetic conditions that do not require high pressure (11,12). For example, arc melting and metathesis reactions have been used to synthesize the transition metal diborides OsB 2 (13, 14), RuB 2 (15), and ReB 2 (16-20). Among these, rhenium diboride (ReB 2 ) with a hardness of approximately 48 GPa under a load of 0.49 N has proven to be the hardest (16, 21). The boron atoms are needed to build the strong covalent metal-boron and boron-boron bonds that are responsible for the high hardness of these materials (12). Because of this, it is expected th...
To enhance the hardness of tungsten tetraboride (WB(4)), a notable lower cost member of the late transition-metal borides, we have synthesized and characterized solid solutions of this material with tantalum (Ta), manganese (Mn), and chromium (Cr). Various concentrations of these transition-metal elements, ranging from 0.0 to 50.0 at. %, on a metals basis, were made. Arc melting was used to synthesize these refractory compounds from the pure elements. Elemental and phase purity of the samples were examined using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD), and microindentation was utilized to measure the Vickers hardness under applied loads of 0.49-4.9 N. XRD results indicate that the solubility limit is below 10 at. % for Cr and below 20 at. % for Mn, while Ta is soluble in WB(4) above 20 at. %. Optimized Vickers hardness values of 52.8 ± 2.2, 53.7 ± 1.8, and 53.5 ± 1.9 GPa were achieved, under an applied load of 0.49 N, when ~2.0, 4.0, and 10.0 at. % Ta, Mn, and Cr were added to WB(4) on a metals basis, respectively. Motivated by these results, ternary solid solutions of WB(4) were produced, keeping the concentration of Ta in WB(4) fixed at 2.0 at. % and varying the concentration of Mn or Cr. This led to hardness values of 55.8 ± 2.3 and 57.3 ± 1.9 GPa (under a load of 0.49 N) for the combinations W(0.94)Ta(0.02)Mn(0.04)B(4) and W(0.93)Ta(0.02)Cr(0.05)B(4), respectively. In situ high-pressure XRD measurements collected up to ~65 GPa generated a bulk modulus of 335 ± 3 GPa for the hardest WB(4) solid solution, W(0.93)Ta(0.02)Cr(0.05)B(4), and showed suppression of a pressure-induced phase transition previously observed in pure WB(4).
Superhard metals are of interest as possible replacements with enhanced properties over the metal carbides commonly used in cutting, drilling, and wear-resistant tooling. Of the superhard metals, the highest boride of tungsten-often referred to as WB 4 and sometimes as W 1-x B 3 -is one of the most promising candidates. The structure of this boride, however, has never been fully resolved, despite the fact that it was discovered in 1961-a fact that severely limits our understanding of its structure-property relationships and has generated increasing controversy in the literature. Here, we present a new crystallographic model of this compound based on refinement against time-of-flight neutron diffraction data. Contrary to previous X-ray-only structural refinements, there is strong evidence for the presence of interstitial arrangements of boron atoms and polyhedral bonding. The formation of these polyhedra-slightly distorted boron cuboctahedra-appears to be dependent upon the defective nature of the tungsten-deficient metal sublattice. This previously unidentified structure type has an intermediary relationship between MB 2 and MB 12 type boride polymorphs. Manipulation of the fractionally occupied metal and boron sites may provide insight for the rational design of new superhard metals.A s demand increases for new superhard materials, the introduction of transition metal borides as candidate compounds has recently attracted a great deal of attention (1-4). This trend is at least partially driven by a need for greater efficiency in cutting tools compared with tungsten carbide (which is not superhard), as well as the shortcomings of the traditional superhard compounds-diamond (which is unusable for cutting ferrous materials) (5) and cubic boron nitride (which is very expensive to synthesize and difficult to shape) (6). Within the rapidly growing family of superhard borides, tungsten tetraboride (or WB 4 ) is of specific interest due to its excellent mechanical properties and its relatively lower cost compared with borides such as ReB 2 , OsB 2 , RuB 2 , and RhB 2 , which contain platinum group metals (3, 7-11). For instance, tungsten tetraboride demonstrates an extremely high indentation hardness of ∼43 GPa by the Vickers method (under an applied load of 0.49 N) (8) and ∼41.7 GPa by nanoindentation (maximum, at a penetration depth of 95.25 nm; Fig. 1), and can sustain a differential stress (a lower-bound estimate of compressive yield strength) of up to ∼19.7 GPa (12). More dramatically, it is like ReB 2 (2), capable of scratching natural diamond (11). We have, furthermore, previously shown that the hardness of this compound may be enhanced by the creation of solid solutions with other transition metals (9). However, to understand the underlying mechanisms for the hardness enhancements observed in WB 4 solid solutions, as well as to guide the design of new superhard borides with tailored mechanical properties, it is crucial to understand the crystal structure of this compound.Perhaps surprisingly for a simple binary ...
The effect of surfactants on wetting behavior of super-hydrophobic surfaces was investigated. Super-hydrophobic surfaces were prepared of alkylketene dimer (AKD) by casting the AKD melt in a specially designed mold. Time-dependent studies were carried out, using the axisymmetric drop shape analysis method for contact angle measurement of pure water on AKD surfaces. The results show that both advancing and receding contact angles of water on the AKD surfaces increase over time ( approximately 3 days) and reach the values of about 164 and 147 degrees , respectively. The increase of contact angles is due to the development of a prickly structure on the surface (verified by scanning electron microscopy), which is responsible for its super-hydrophobicity. Aqueous solutions of sodium acetate, sodium dodecyl sulfate, hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, and n-decanoyl-n-methylglucamine were used to investigate the wetting of AKD surfaces. Advancing and receding contact angles for various concentrations of different surfactant solutions were measured. The contact angle results were compared to those of a number of pure liquids with surface tensions similar to those of surfactant solutions. It was found that although the surface tensions of pure liquids and surfactant solutions at high concentrations are similar, the contact angles are very different. Furthermore, the usual behavior of super-hydrophobic surfaces that turn super-hydrophilic when the intrinsic contact angle of liquid on a smooth surface (of identical material) is below 90 degrees was not observed in the presence of surfactants. The difference in the results for pure liquids and surfactant solutions is explained using an adsorption hypothesis.
Abstract:In this work, we examine the high pressure behavior of superhard material candidate WB 4 using high-pressure synchrotron X-ray diffraction in a diamond anvil cell up to 58.4 GPa. The zero-pressure bulk modulus, K 0 , obtained from fitting the pressure-volume data using the second-order Birch-Murnaghan equation of state is 326 ± 3 GPa. A reversible, discontinuous change in slope in the c/a ratio is further observed at ~42 GPa, suggesting that lattice softening occurs in the c direction above this pressure. This softening is not observed in other superhard transition metal borides such as ReB 2 compressed to similar pressures. Speculation on the possible relationship between this softening and the orientation of boronboron bonds in the c direction in the WB 4 structure is included. Finally, the shear and Young's modulus values are calculated using an isotropic model based on the measured bulk modulus and an estimated Poisson's ratio for WB 4 .
Alloys of tungsten tetraboride (WB4) with the group 4 transition metals, titanium (Ti), zirconium (Zr), and hafnium (Hf), of different concentrations (0-50 at. % on a metals basis) were synthesized by arc-melting in order to study their mechanical properties. The phase composition and purity of the as-synthesized samples were confirmed using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The solubility limit as determined by PXRD is 20 at. % for Ti, 10 at. % for Zr, and 8 at. % for Hf. Vickers indentation measurements of WB4 alloys with 8 at. % Ti, 8 at. % Zr, and 6 at. % Hf gave hardness values, Hv, of 50.9 ± 2.2, 55.9 ± 2.7 and 51.6 ± 2.8 GPa, respectively, compared to 43.3 GPa for pure WB4 under an applied load of 0.49 N. Each of the aforementioned compositions are considered superhard (Hv > 40 GPa), likely due to extrinsic hardening that plays a key role in these superhard metal borides. Furthermore, these materials exhibit a significantly reduced indentation size effect, which can be seen in the plateauing hardness values for the W1-xZrxB4 alloy. In addition, W0.92Zr0.08B4, a product of spinoidal decomposition, possesses nanostructured grains and enhanced grain hardening. The hardness of W0.92Zr0.08B4 is 34.7 ± 0.65 GPa under an applied load of 4.9 N, the highest value obtained for any superhard metal at this relatively high loading. In addition, the WB4 alloys with Ti, Zr, and Hf showed a substantially increased oxidation resistance up to ∼460 °C, ∼510 °C, and ∼490 °C, respectively, compared to ∼400 °C for pure WB4.
Previous efforts toward the synthesis of materials with superior mechanical properties (e.g., superhardness, high bulk modulus, and high shear modulus) have focused on binary metal boride structures with short covalent bonds. In this paper, we discuss the methods for enhancing the intrinsic and extrinsic hardening factors commonly used to achieve these properties. As the realm of binary metal borides has all but been exhausted, there is a need to move to ternary and higher borides as well as to achieve greater morphological control at the nanoscale. The use of ternary and higher borides as starting materials provides a multitude of diverse compositional and structural combinations. These compounds merit further investigation as they offer the potential for the optimization of mechanical properties.
The search for new ultraincompressible, superhard materials has been performed largely through trial and error. Despite the difficulties in synthesizing such materials, interest in this field has blossomed with recent experimental and theoretical results. Such progress has led to the development of superhard metal borides, ultraincompressible nitrides, and strong carbides. Our previous parameters of high electron density and high covalent bond density had served us well in synthesizing ultraincompressible, superhard metals, but after a decade of research, a more detailed understanding is needed. By studying the origin of strength from previously discovered incompressible, hard materials, we hope to gain new insight into this rapidly growing field. In particular, we propose a focus on bonding and structure to understand why some materials are ultraincompressible and superhard.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.