Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a member of the ErbB family and is a key proto-oncogene in solid tumors. This pilot study investigated the safety and efficacy of pyrotinib in HER2-positive non-breast advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Twenty-five patients with HER2-positive advanced solid tumors excluding breast cancer were enrolled to receive pyrotinib-based therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: The median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.2-5.0 months) and 9.6 months (95% CI: 4.4-9.9 months), respectively. Ten patients with lung cancer and 9 patients with gastric cancer had a median PFS of 2.5 months (95% CI: 0.97-6.53 months) and 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.50-7.17 months), respectively. The median OS was 9.9 months (95% CI: 4.4-9.9 months) in patients with lung cancer and 5.9 months (95% CI: 4.0-9.6 months) in patients with gastric cancer. No statistical significance of a median OS was observed, nonetheless, patients receiving > 3 lines had a numerically lower median OS than those receiving ≤ 3 lines of treatment (9.9 vs 5.1 months, P = 0.706). All 23 patients were available for efficacy evaluation. The objective response rate (ORR) was 52.17% and disease control rate (DCR) was 91.3%. The ORR for lung cancer was 44.4% and for gastric cancer was 50%. In addition, the DCR for lung cancer was 77.8% and for stomach cancer was 100%. Moreover, patients receiving ≤3 lines of treatment had a numerically higher DCR than those receiving >3 lines of treatment (94.1% vs 83.3%, P = 0.462). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were diarrhea (92%), but only 5 (20%) patients reported grade 3 diarrhea which could be well controlled. Conclusion: Pyrotinib-based therapy demonstrates promising efficacy for HER2-positive advanced solid tumors excluding breast cancer and toxicities could be well controlled. The study is a pilot study motivating larger studies to elucidate the safety and efficacy of pyrotinib in non-breast solid tumors.

The emergence of epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) exon 20 p.C797S is one of the major resistance mechanisms for osimertinib. However, there are no standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after acquiring EGFR C797S currently, which brings significant challenges to post-osimertinib clinical management. In the present study, we described a 52-year-old female patient with EGFR -mutated stage IV lung adenocarcinoma, who achieved a partial response (PR) to the treatment of gefitinib and osimertinib after acquiring EGFR exon 20 p.T790M-trans-C797S at osimertinib failure. After progression on the combinatorial treatment, allelic configuration shifted to T790M-cis-C797S. The patient subsequently received a regimen of osimertinib and anlotinib combined with chemotherapy, followed by osimertinib and anlotinib maintenance treatment, and achieved a PR lasting for 9 months. At disease progression, concomitant T790M-C797S mutations both in trans and cis were identified. A combination of chemo- and anti-angiogenic therapies was administrated for two cycles and then discontinued because of the poor physical condition of the patient. She passed away soon with an overall survival of 39 months and a post-osimertinib progression survival of 20 months. Our study provides the first clinical evidence that the osimertinib and anlotinib-based regimen may be an effective therapy in overcoming resistance mediated by T790M-cis-C797S. Our case also highlights the importance of dynamically monitoring the mutation status after osimertinib failure, which may provide patients with increased opportunities for targeted therapy and improve post-osimertinib progression survivals.

The main therapeutic strategy for metastatic Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is palliative chemotherapy. A number of studies have demonstrated that anti-angiogenic therapy and immunotherapy could improve the survival rate of patients with metastases. However, the effectiveness of the combination of anti-angiogenic therapy and immunotherapy for the therapy of MFS is undetermined. The current study reports a case of metastatic myxofibrosarcoma that was treated with combination Nivolumab (monoclonal antibody, PD-1 inhibitor) and Bevacizumab (monoclonal antibody, anti-VEGF) after progression from the single use of Nivolumab. The aim of the current study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Nivolumab and Bevacizumab for metastatic myxofibrosarcoma and to review the literature. Up to the termination of the follow-up, the patient achieved a partial response for 16 months, had an overall survival for over 29 months since the metastasis and demonstrated a sustained benefit from treatment. The most frequent adverse events were fatigue, abnormality of Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hypertension and proteinuria. Nivolumab and Bevacizumab treatment indicate beneficial clinical effects and are indicated to be safe to use in patients with metastatic myxofibrosarcoma.

Objective Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), the most frequent central venous catheter, are used to provide medical treatments, although long-term PICC-related adverse outcomes are unknown in China. This study systematically investigated PICC-related complications in four Chinese hospitals. Methods Between January 2014 and January 2020, we analyzed the results of 3550 patients with PICC who were referred to four Chinese hospitals. All patients underwent PICC treatment in four Chinese hospitals. Patient-reported signs and symptoms of a putative PICC-related complication or functional were studied. Long-term outcomes and hospitalization costs were also evaluated. Results An aggregate of 3285 patients were enrolled in the analytic cohort. 58.6% were females and 41.4% were males. The most common reasons for PICC placement included oncologic malignancy and critically ill patients. The majority of PICCs had valved systems (90.7%) and were implanted in the right side (85.5%) and into the basilic vein (87.7%). At least one potential PICC-related problem or adverse effects (AEs) was reported by 67.3% of patients. Central line-associated bloodstream infection (28.1%) and symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (20.7%) were the most common complications. The majority of PICCs were removed for causes other than AEs, with just 723 reported AEs accounting for 22.0% of all PICC removals. The most reasons for PICCs removal were occlusion (425, 12.9%) and exit‐site infections (189, 5.8%). Conclusions This study is the first retrospective study in our country to explore PICC-related complications. While living with a PICC, more than 67.3% of patients report signs and symptoms of at least one PICC-related problem or adverse impacts, such as difficulties with PICC use and poor effects on physical and social function. In this group, PICCs are safe and effective, although the danger of PICC-related problems should not be disregarded.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is sensitive to chemoradiotherapy but remains to have a poor prognosis. In the immunotherapy era, chemotherapy combined with PD-L1 inhibitors has become a new first-line treatment option for advanced SCLC. The CheckMate 032 study combined a PD-1 blockade and a CTLA-4 inhibitor and found that this dual immunotherapy might be a positive treatment choice for SCLC. In our case, the patient with advanced SCLC received bevacizumab combined with dual immunotherapy over the third line with more than 12 months survival time. The overall survival time was 21.5 months from the start of the third-line treatment and 39 months from the time of extensive-disease SCLC diagnosis. The combination of a VEGF blockade and a dual immunotherapy in SCLC resulted in synergistic treatment effects. Therefore, bevacizumab might be a better adjuvant, either combined with chemotherapy or dual immunotherapy, for patients with persistent disease progression after undergoing immunotherapy.