Type 1 diabetes mellitus is believed to result from destruction of the insulin-producing β-cells in pancreatic islets that is mediated by autoimmune mechanisms. The classic view is that autoreactive T cells mistakenly destroy healthy (‘innocent’) β-cells. We propose an alternative view in which the β-cell is the key contributor to the disease. By their nature and function, β-cells are prone to biosynthetic stress with limited measures for self-defence. β-Cell stress provokes an immune attack that has considerable negative effects on the source of a vital hormone. This view would explain why immunotherapy at best delays progression of type 1 diabetes mellitus and points to opportunities to use therapies that revitalize β-cells, in combination with immune intervention strategies, to reverse the disease. We present the case that dysfunction occurs in both the immune system and β-cells, which provokes further dysfunction, and present the evidence leading to the consensus that islet autoimmunity is an essential component in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Next, we build the case for the β-cell as the trigger of an autoimmune response, supported by analogies in cancer and antitumour immunity. Finally, we synthesize a model (‘connecting the dots’) in which both β-cell stress and islet autoimmunity can be harnessed as targets for intervention strategies.

No abstract

Aims/hypothesis Transcriptome analyses revealed insulin-gene-derived transcripts in non-beta endocrine islet cells. We studied alternative splicing of human INS mRNA in pancreatic islets. Methods Alternative splicing of insulin pre-mRNA was determined by PCR analysis performed on human islet RNA and single-cell RNA-seq analysis. Antisera were generated to detect insulin variants in human pancreatic tissue using immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy and single-cell western blot to confirm the expression of insulin variants. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activation was determined by MIP-1β release. Results We identified an alternatively spliced INS product. This variant encodes the complete insulin signal peptide and B chain and an alternative C-terminus that largely overlaps with a previously identified defective ribosomal product of INS. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the translation product of this INS-derived splice transcript was detectable in somatostatin-producing delta cells but not in beta cells; this was confirmed by light and electron microscopy. Expression of this alternatively spliced INS product activated preproinsulin-specific CTLs in vitro. The exclusive presence of this alternatively spliced INS product in delta cells may be explained by its clearance from beta cells by insulin-degrading enzyme capturing its insulin B chain fragment and a lack of insulin-degrading enzyme expression in delta cells. Conclusions/interpretation Our data demonstrate that delta cells can express an INS product derived from alternative splicing, containing both the diabetogenic insulin signal peptide and B chain, in their secretory granules. We propose that this alternative INS product may play a role in islet autoimmunity and pathology, as well as endocrine or paracrine function or islet development and endocrine destiny, and transdifferentiation between endocrine cells. INS promoter activity is not confined to beta cells and should be used with care when assigning beta cell identity and selectivity. Data availability The full EM dataset is available via www.nanotomy.org (for review: http://www.nanotomy.org/OA/Tienhoven2021SUB/6126-368/). Single-cell RNA-seq data was made available by Segerstolpe et al [13] and can be found at https://sandberglab.se/pancreas. The RNA and protein sequence of INS-splice was uploaded to GenBank (BankIt2546444 INS-splice OM489474). Graphical abstract

Type 1 diabetes patients carrying a ‘protective’ insulin gene (INS) variant present a disease endotype with reduced insulin antibody titers, preserved beta cell function and improved glycemic control. We tested whether this protective INS variant associated with lowered risk for development of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) as long-term diabetic complications. Insulin gene polymorphisms were evaluated in 1,363 type 1 diabetes patients participating in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study that compared intensive versus conventional insulin therapy in relation with development of PDR and DKD with a follow-up of over two decades. PDR and DKD were absent in type 1 diabetes patients carrying the protective INS variant and receiving intensive insulin therapy (the current standard of clinical care) 1–5 years from their diagnosis (n = 67; mean post-diagnosis follow up of 20.4 ± 1.6 years), versus 11 of 258 patients (4.3%) lacking this variant (20.4 ± 1.8 years follow up). In the secondary intervention group of the intensive therapy arm (1–15 years of disease), PDR was significantly less frequent in carriers of the protective INS variant than those without it (4 of 83 [4.8%] vs. 31 of 260 [11.9%]; p = 0.032; 26.1 ± 3.9 and 26.3 ± 4.1 years follow-up, respectively), whereas DKD frequencies were no different between those with or without this variant (5 of 83 [6.0%] vs. 11 of 260 [4.2%]). Carrying a copy of this protective INS variant further reduces the risk of diabetic complications achieved by intensive insulin therapy and marks a disease endotype with superior glycemic control, increased and extended beta cell function, and prevention of DKD and PDR.