For women with stress urinary incontinence, initial midurethral-sling surgery, as compared with initial physiotherapy, results in higher rates of subjective improvement and subjective and objective cure at 1 year. (Funded by ZonMw, the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development; Dutch Trial Register number, NTR1248.).

No abstract

After a follow-up of 36 months, MiniArc (SIMS) is non-inferior to Monarc (SMUS) with respect to subjective and objective cure.

At the 2-year follow-up, the non-prespecified analysis of this randomised trial showed that the MiniArc, a single-incision sling, had similar subjective and similar objective cure rates, although non-inferiority to Monarc for subjective cure could not be demonstrated.

Patients are willing to accept a slightly lower probability of cure to prevent substantial post-operative pain by undergoing a less invasive procedure. These results are relevant for counselling of patients indicated for SUI surgery.

We demonstrated that the short-term results of MiniArc™, are maintained over time, defining the comparability of the two slings at 5 years in terms of subjective and objective outcomes and complications. Neurourol. Urodynam. 36:803-807, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

There is a high practice variation in LSH and LSC performed by a selected group of Dutch gynecologists. Different methods have been described in the literature and there is no consensus on how to perform these procedures. A well-designed prospective study or randomized controlled trial with regard to the specific parts of these procedures is needed to provide evidence for the best surgical technique. The outcomes of these studies will help to establish evidence-based guidelines.

The incidence of relaxation of the pelvic floor increases with age, and although a relation between prolapse and the decline of estrogens has been suggested, there is no objective evidence. Together with urodynamic measurements, anal manometry is one of the few ways of making an objective assessment of the strength of pelvic structures located in and near the pelvic floor. In order to study the role of estrogens, anal manometry was performed before, during and after estrogen replacement therapy with daily oral use of 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens for 6 months. Five postmenopausal women, who had not used estrogen replacement therapy in the past, were included in the study. None of the manometric parameters, including maximal anal resting pressure, maximal squeeze pressure and internal anal sphincter response, changed. It was concluded that estrogens have no effects on manometric parameters of the external sphincter and that anal manometry may not be the appropriate method to assess the effects of estrogens on the pelvic floor.