Additional HBOT did not significantly improve complete wound healing or limb salvage in patients with diabetes and lower-limb ischemia.

Background In patients after heart transplantation, systemic arterial hypertension and enhanced central aortic stiffness contribute to increased ventricular afterload, which might lead to graft dysfunction. The aim of our study was to characterize systemic arterial elastance and its impact on left ventricular function and ventriculo‐arterial coupling in a cohort of children, adolescents, and young adults after heart transplantation using invasive conductance catheter technique. Methods and Results Thirty patients who had heart transplants (age, 20.0±6.5 years, 7 female) underwent invasive cardiac catheterization including pressure‐volume loop analysis. Load‐independent parameters of systolic (ventricular elastance [Ees]) and diastolic (ventricular compliance) function as well as systemic arterial elastance (Ea, end‐systolic pressure/stroke volume) and ventriculo‐arterial coupling (Ea/Ees) were assessed at baseline level and during dobutamine infusion (10 μg/kg/min). Ees showed an appropriate increase under inotropic stimulation from 0.43 (0.11–2.52) to 1.00 (0.20–5.10) mm Hg/mL/m 2 ( P <0.0001), whereas ventricular compliance remained rather unchanged (0.16±0.10 mm Hg/mL/m 2 to 0.12±0.07 mm Hg/mL/m 2 ; P =0.10). Ventriculo‐arterial coupling Ea/Ees was abnormal at rest and did not improve significantly under dobutamine (1.7 [0.6–6.7] to 1.3 [0.5–4.9], P =0.70) due to a simultaneous rise in Ea from 0.71 (0.37–2.82) to 1.10 (0.52–4.03) mm Hg/mL/m 2 ( P <0.0001). Both Ees and ventricular compliance were significantly associated with Ea at baseline and under dobutamine infusion. Conclusions Patients who underwent heart transplantation show impaired ventriculo‐arterial coupling at rest and under inotropic stimulation despite preserved left ventricular contractile reserve. An abnormal response in vascular function resulting in increased afterload seems to represent an important factor that may play a role for the development of late graft failure.

Aim: Hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) may increase the risk of amputation. This study reports the positive influence of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on hard-to-heal DFUs involving underlying bone. Method: A single-centre, retrospective cohort study reporting the results of HBOT and wound care on hard-to-heal University of Texas grade 3 DFUs (i.e., involving underlying bone) between 2013 and 2019. Outcome measures were primarily (near-) complete wound healing (i.e., ≥80% ulcer surface area reduction) and amputation rate (minor or major), and secondarily the number of hyperbaric sessions and improvement in quality of life (QoL) and pain score. Results: The study included 206 patients, of whom 74 (36%) achieved complete wound healing, and 75 (36%) near-complete healing. Amputations were performed in 27 patients (13%): 12 (6%) minor and 15 (7%) major. The median number of HBOT sessions was 42. Participants who achieved complete healing received a median of 43 sessions, compared with 10 for those who required major amputation. Patients with at least 30 sessions were less likely to undergo amputation (odds ratio: 0.08; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03–0.21). Mean QoL increased by 7.6 points (95%CI: 3.9–11.3; p<0.01) and median pain score fell from 3 to 1 (0–3) (p<0.01). Conclusions: The addition of HBOT to standard wound care may lead to a decreased amputation risk, improved wound healing and increased QoL for people with a University of Texas grade 3 DFU. An adequate number of HBOT sessions is required to achieve optimal clinical results. Objective selection criteria and shared decision-making are suggested to improve dropout rates.

OBJECTIVETo analyze wound healing results of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for a variety of different wound types.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study included all patients treated with HBOT and wound care at a single hyperbaric center between January 2017 and December 2020. The primary outcome was wound healing. Secondary outcome measures were quality of life (QoL), number of sessions, adverse effects, and treatment cost. Investigators also examined possible influencing factors, including age, sex, type and duration of wound, socioeconomic status, smoking status, and presence of peripheral vascular disease.RESULTSA total of 774 treatment series were recorded, with a median of 39 sessions per patient (interquartile range, 23-51 sessions). In total, 472 wounds (61.0%) healed, 177 (22.9%) partially healed, 41 (5.3%) deteriorated, and 39 (5.0%) minor and 45 (5.8%) major amputations were performed. Following HBOT, median wound surface area decreased from 4.4 cm2 to 0.2 cm2 (P < .01), and patient QoL improved from 60 to 75 on a 100-point scale (P < .01). The median cost of therapy was €9,188 (interquartile range, €5,947-€12,557). Frequently recorded adverse effects were fatigue, hyperoxic myopia, and middle ear barotrauma. Attending fewer than 30 sessions and having severe arterial disease were both associated with a negative outcome.CONCLUSIONSAdding HBOT to standard wound care increases wound healing and QoL in selected wounds. Patients with severe arterial disease should be screened for potential benefits. Most reported adverse effects are mild and transient.

No abstract