Denture plaque could be a potential source of bacterial and fungal infections in patients with COPD.

No abstract

BACKGROUND: A significant percentage of patients with asthma and COPD do not use their inhalers properly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a single session of inhalation technique training on the frequency of inhalation errors and the course of asthma and COPD. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included adults who had been diagnosed with and treated for asthma or COPD with at least one inhaler use daily on a regular basis. All subjects were followed for 6 months, at which time their inhalation technique was assessed and an individual inhalation training (study group) or a sham procedure (control group) was applied. The number of mishandlings was calculated as the ratio of the number of errors to the number of inhalers used by an individual subject. The effect of training was evaluated after 3 months and again after 6 months. RESULTS: 50 subjects with asthma and 50 subjects with COPD were enrolled. Only 20% of subjects made no critical errors before the intervention. Subjects who were trained in the proper inhalation technique made fewer errors after 3 months (32 of 50 vs 20 of 50). The relative risk was 1.63 (95% CI 1.1-2.4, P ‫؍‬ .01) and the number needed to treat was 3.9 (95% CI 2.2-15). Despite the improvement in the inhalation technique, we found no reduction in the number of asthma/COPD exacerbations, symptom severity, or the quality of life. After 3 consecutive months, the efficacy of the intervention decreased, and only 66% of the former responders maintained the lower ratio of errors per inhaler. After 6 months, there was no difference in the number of subjects with better inhalation technique between intervention (24 of 50) and control group (27 of 50) (P ‫؍‬ .62). CONCLUSIONS: Although a single inhalation training leads to a reduction in the number of errors made during inhalation, it does not influence the course of asthma and COPD. The positive effect of a single inhalation technique training is temporary. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02131454.

No abstract

Oral inflammation is an important contributor to the etiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, which can impact patient's health status. Previous studies indicate that people with poor oral health are at higher risk for nosocomial pneumonia. Denture wearing is one promoting factor in the development of mucosal infections. Colonization of the denture plaque by Gram-negative bacteria, Candida spp., or other respiratory pathogens, occurring locally, may be aspirated to the lungs. The studies showed that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients treated with combinations of medicines with corticosteroids more frequently suffer from Candida-associated denture stomatitis. Treatment of oral candidiasis in patients with COPD constitutes a therapeutic problem. Therefore, it is essential to pay attention to the condition of oral mucosal membrane and denture hygiene habits. The guidelines for care and maintenance of dentures for COPD patients are presented in this paper. The majority of patients required improvement of their prosthetic and oral hygiene. Standard oral hygiene procedures in relation to dentures, conducted for prophylaxis of stomatitis complicated by mucosal infection among immunocompromised patients, are essential to maintain healthy oral tissues. The elimination of traumatic denture action in dental office, compliance with oral and denture hygiene, proper use and storage of prosthetic appliances in a dry environment outside the oral cavity can reduce susceptibility to infection. Proper attention to hygiene, including brushing and rinsing the mouth, may also help prevent denture stomatitis in these patients.

The prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has increased more rapidly in women than in men during the past two decades. Clinical presentation, comorbidities and prognosis may differ between genders and may influence management decisions. The influence of gender on COPD expression has not been clearly explained to date. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate significant differences between women and men suffering from COPD, regarding clinical presentation, pulmonary function test results, comorbidities, and prognosis. We prospectively recruited 470 patients with stable COPD with a history of smoking (152 women, 318 men, mean age 65.5 ± 8.8 vs. 66.6 ± 9.4 years, respectively). Comorbidities and exacerbations were recorded. Spirometry, body plethysmography, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity and 6-min walk tests were performed. The BODE prognostic score was also calculated. We found that women smoked less in comparison to men (30.4 vs. 41.9 pack-years, p < 0.05), showed more exacerbations (2.5 vs. 1.7, p = 0.01), higher forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1%predicted), and increased residual volume/total lung capacity (RV/%TLC), but they had the same intensity of dyspnea. Women showed fewer comorbidities, on average, per patient (5.4 vs. 6.4, p = 0.002), but had a higher prevalence of at least seven comorbidities per patient (48.7% of women vs. 33.0% of men, p < 0.05). Women also had a significantly worse prognosis (4.6 vs. 3.1 BODE score, p < 0.05) that correlated with the number of comorbidities (r = 0.33, p < 0.01). In conclusion, this study strongly supports the existence of different gender phenotypes in COPD, especially regarding exacerbations, comorbidities, and prognosis. The gender difference may indicate a need for a targeted assessment and management of COPD in women and men.

Background. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with various comorbidities, which influence the course of COPD and worsen prognosis. Objectives. The aim of this study was to analyze the comorbidities in a cohort of COPD patients in Poland during 12 months of observation. Material and methods. A total of 444 COPD patients (median age: 66. 1 years) in all stages of airflow limitation severity were enrolled. Medical histories and a questionnaire concerning comorbidities were analyzed at baseline and after 12 months (data of 267 patients available). Anthropometric data, pulmonary function, and body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity (BODE index) were assessed. Results. No comorbidities were reported in 9 patients (2.0%), 101 patients (22.7%) had 1-2 comorbidities, 243 (54.7%) had 3-5, and 91 (20.6%) had more than 5 comorbidities. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) were the most frequent ones, followed by peptic ulcer, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and osteoporosis; 11 patients had a history of lung cancer. Cachexia was observed in 11 cases, overweight in 136 cases and obesity in 139 cases. The incidence of CVDs increased with time. The number of comorbidities correlated with the body mass index (BMI) and the number of hospitalizations for extra-pulmonary causes, but not with airflow limitation. The BODE index score increased with the number of comorbidities. Conclusions. In a cohort of Polish COPD patients, the most frequent comorbidities were CVDs. The number of comorbidities affected the BODE index, but not airflow limitation. The BODE index is better than forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1) in the rating of COPD patients' condition. The BMI correlated with the number of comorbidities as well as the number of hospitalizations for extra-pulmonary causes.

We didn't observe any differences in serum levels of pro- and antiapoptotic markers in COPD patients and the control group or correlations between the markers studied and COPD parameters.