Objective To better understand the clinical spectrum and course of congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) during the first 18 months of life of children whose mothers had rash during pregnancy. Methods This longitudinal observational study evaluated the clinical progress from birth until 18 months of life of children of mothers who developed rash during or up to 3 months before gestation. Maternal rash occurred from November 2015 to May 2017. The study subjects were divided into three groups: children whose mothers tested positive by RT-qPCR for Zika virus (ZIKV) (Group 1), children whose mothers tested negative by RT-qPCR for ZIKV (Group 2), and children whose mothers did not undergo any testing for ZIKV (Group 3) but tested negative for other congenital infections. Results Between April 2016 and July 2018, we studied 108 children: 43 in Group 1, 26 in Group 2 and 39 in Group 3. The majority of children were admitted into the study within 6 months of life. CZS was diagnosed in 26 children, equally distributed in Groups 1 and 3. Of 18 children with microcephaly, 6 were in Group 1 (1 postnatal) and 12 were in Group 3 (5 postnatal). Maternal rash frequency was 10 times higher during the first trimester than in the other trimesters (OR: 10.35; CI 95%: 3.52–30.41). CZS was diagnosed during the follow-up period in 14 (54%) cases. Developmental delays and motor abnormalities occurred in all children and persisted up to 18 months. Epilepsy occurred in 18 (69%) of the cases. Conclusions Infants born of mothers exposed to ZIKV during pregnancy showed progression of developmental, motor and neurologic abnormalities even if they were born asymptomatic. Continued postnatal monitoring of such newborns is necessary to preclude disability-associated complications.

No abstract

No abstract

Our study confirms the importance of HHV-6 infection in young children and highlights the difficulties of diagnosing a rash illness on clinical grounds alone.

No abstract

Objective: To evaluate auditory manifestations in children born to mothers who had exanthema during pregnancy, suspected to have been exposed to the Zika virus (ZIKV). Study Design: Prospective observational. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Children born in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between April 2016 and September 2017, who were referred for newborn hearing screening (NHS). Intervention: The NHS was performed by the automated brainstem auditory-evoked potential test at an intensity of 30 dBHL (decibels Hearing Level) with the result presented as “PASS/FAIL.” A follow-up test was performed 6 months after the first examination. Main Outcome Measures: Hearing outcomes by audiological assessment. Results: Ninety-eight children were recruited and 78 underwent the NHS test. In the first evaluation, the FAIL NHS result was observed in 4 of the 78 children. Three were diagnosed with sensorineural hearing loss and one had conductive loss. Including the first and second evaluation, the frequency of audiological alterations was 5.1%. Of the four children diagnosed with hearing loss, two were carriers of ZIKV, one had suspected ZIKV infection, and one was asymptomatic with confirmed exposure to the virus. There was no progression of hearing loss or other hearing abnormality in the children by the time of the second evaluation. The group of nonexposed children (negative quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for ZIKV) showed no hearing loss. Conclusion: Uni or bilateral sensorineural hearing loss was diagnosed in asymptomatic children at birth. These observations highlight the importance of periodic follow-up of patients with congenital Zika syndrome to better understand their long-term auditory clinical outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Exanthem subitum is a classical rash disease of early childhood caused by human herpesvirus 6B (HHV-6B). However, the rash is frequently misdiagnosed as that of either measles or rubella. METHODS: In this study, a nested multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to diagnose HHV-6B primary infection, differentiate it from infections caused by HHV-6A and compare it to antibody avidity tests. The samples were separated into case group and control group according to the results of the indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) technique. RESULTS: From the saliva samples analyzed, HHV-6A DNA was detected in 3.2% of the case group and in 2.6% of the control group. Regarding HHV-6B, PCR detected viral DNA in 4.8% of the case group and in 1.3% of the control group. Among the serum samples studied, a frequency of 1.7% was determined for HHV-6A in the case group and 1.2% in the control group. PCR did not detect HHV-6B DNA in serum samples. The sensitivity and specificity of the PCR technique ranged from 0% to 4.8% and 97.5% to 100%, respectively, compared to IFA. CONCLUSIONS: The PCR technique was not suitable for diagnosing primary infection by HHV-6B in children with exanthematic disease and should not substitute the IFA.

No abstract