De novo protein design holds promise for creating small stable proteins with shapes customized to bind therapeutic targets. We describe a massively parallel approach for designing, manufacturing and screening mini-protein binders, integrating large-scale computational design, oligonucleotide synthesis, yeast display screening and next-generation sequencing. We designed and tested 22,660 mini-proteins of 37–43 residues that target influenza haemagglutinin and botulinum neurotoxin B, along with 6,286 control sequences to probe contributions to folding and binding, and identified 2,618 high-affinity binders. Comparison of the binding and non-binding design sets, which are two orders of magnitude larger than any previously investigated, enabled the evaluation and improvement of the computational model. Biophysical characterization of a subset of the binder designs showed that they are extremely stable and, unlike antibodies, do not lose activity after exposure to high temperatures. The designs elicit little or no immune response and provide potent prophylactic and therapeutic protection against influenza, even after extensive repeated dosing.
We developed a de novo protein design strategy to swiftly engineer decoys for neutralizing pathogens that exploit extracellular host proteins to infect the cell. Our pipeline allowed the design, validation, and optimization of de novo hACE2 decoys to neutralize SARS-CoV-2. The best decoy, CTC-445.2, binds with low nanomolar affinity and high specificity to the RBD of the spike protein. Cryo-EM shows that the design is accurate and can simultaneously bind to all three RBDs of a single spike protein. Because the decoy replicates the spike protein target interface in hACE2, it is intrinsically resilient to viral mutational escape. A bivalent decoy, CTC-445.2d, shows ~10-fold improvement in binding. CTC-445.2d potently neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 infection of cells in vitro and a single intranasal prophylactic dose of decoy protected Syrian hamsters from a subsequent lethal SARS-CoV-2 challenge.
The study of binding thermodynamics is essential to understand how affinity and selectivity are acquired in molecular complexes. Periplasmic binding proteins (PBPs) are macromolecules of biotechnological interest that bind a broad number of ligands and have been used to design biosensors. The lysine‐arginine‐ornithine binding protein (LAO) is a PBP of 238 residues that binds the basic amino acids l‐arginine and l‐histidine with nm and μm affinity, respectively. It has been shown that the affinity difference for arginine and histidine binding is caused by enthalpy, this correlates with the higher number of protein–ligand contacts formed with arginine. In order to elucidate the structural bases that determine binding affinity and selectivity in LAO, the contribution of protein–ligand contacts to binding energetics was assessed. To this end, an alanine scanning of the LAO‐binding site residues was performed and arginine and histidine binding were characterized by isothermal titration calorimetry and X‐ray crystallography. Although unexpected enthalpy and entropy changes were observed in some mutants, thermodynamic data correlated with structural information, especially, the binding heat capacity change. We found that selectivity is conferred by several residues rather than exclusive arginine–protein interactions. Furthermore, crystallographic structures revealed that protein–ligand contributions to binding thermodynamics are highly influenced by the solvent. Finally, we found a similar backbone conformation in all the closed structures obtained, but different structures in the open state, suggesting that the binding site residues of LAO play an important role in stabilizing not only the holo conformation, but also the apo state. Database Structural data are available in the Protein Data Bank database under the accession numbers http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6MLE, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6MLN, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6MLG, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6MKX, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6MLI, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6MLA, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6MKU, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6MKW, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6ML0, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6MLD, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6MLV, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6MLO, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6MLP, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6ML9, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6MLJ.
There is an urgent need for the ability to rapidly develop effective countermeasures for emerging biological threats, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that causes the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We have developed a generalized computational design strategy to rapidly engineer de novo proteins that precisely recapitulate the protein surface targeted by biological agents, like viruses, to gain entry into cells. The designed proteins act as decoys that block cellular entry and aim to be resilient to viral mutational escape. Using our novel platform, in less than ten weeks, we engineered, validated, and optimized de novo protein decoys of human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2), the membrane-associated protein that SARS-CoV-2 exploits to infect cells. Our optimized designs are hyperstable de novo proteins (~18-37 kDa), have high affinity for the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) and can potently inhibit the virus infection and replication in vitro. Future refinements to our strategy can enable the rapid development of other therapeutic de novo protein decoys, not limited to neutralizing viruses, but to combat any agent that explicitly interacts with cell surface proteins to cause disease.
Substrate‐binding proteins (SBPs) are used by organisms from the three domains of life for transport and signalling. SBPs are composed of two domains that collectively trap ligands with high affinity and selectivity. To explore the role of the domains and the integrity of the hinge region between them in the function and conformation of SBPs, here, we describe the ligand binding, conformational stability and folding kinetics of the Lysine Arginine Ornithine (LAO) binding protein from Salmonella thiphimurium and constructs corresponding to its two independent domains. LAO is a class II SBP formed by a continuous and a discontinuous domain. Contrary to the expected behaviour based on their connectivity, the discontinuous domain shows a stable native‐like structure that binds l‐arginine with moderate affinity, whereas the continuous domain is barely stable and shows no detectable ligand binding. Regarding folding kinetics, studies of the entire protein revealed the presence of at least two intermediates. While the unfolding and refolding of the continuous domain exhibited only a single intermediate and simpler and faster kinetics than LAO, the folding mechanism of the discontinuous domain was complex and involved multiple intermediates. These findings suggest that in the complete protein the continuous domain nucleates folding and that its presence funnels the folding of the discontinuous domain avoiding nonproductive interactions. The strong dependence of the function, stability and folding pathway of the lobes on their covalent association is most likely the result of the coevolution of both domains as a single unit.
Cloud and clear points and viscosities of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS) have been determined as a function of 2-phenyl alkane and/or tetralin content over a wide interval. While the 2-phenyl content significantly affects the solubility, tetraIins have a marked depressive effect on viscosity. The investigation has established that LAS solubility can be explained by assuming eutectic types of isomer and homolog mixtures, which are dependent on internaI to external isomer ratios.JAOCS 72, 115-122 (1995).
Substrate-binding proteins (SBP) are used by organisms from the three domains of life for transport and signaling. SBPs are composed of two domains that collectively trap ligands with high affinity and selectivity. To explore the role of the domains and the integrity of the hinge region between them in the function and conformation of SBPs, here we describe the ligand binding, conformational stability, and folding kinetics of the Lysine Arginine Ornithine binding protein (LAO) from Salmonella thiphimurium and constructs corresponding to its two independent domains. LAO is a class II SBP formed by a continuous and a discontinuous domain. Contrary to the expected behavior based on their connectivity, the discontinuous domain shows a stable native-like structure that binds L-arginine with moderate affinity, whereas the continuous domain is barely stable and shows no detectable ligand binding. Regarding folding kinetics, studies of the entire protein revealed the presence of at least two intermediates. While the unfolding and refolding of the continuous domain exhibited only a single intermediate and simpler and faster kinetics than LAO, the folding mechanism of the discontinuous domain was complex and involved multiple intermediates. These findings suggest that in the complete protein the continuous domain nucleates folding and that its presence funnels the folding of the discontinuous domain avoiding nonproductive interactions. The strong dependence of the function, stability, and folding pathway of the lobes on their covalent association, is most likely the result of the coevolution of both domains as a single unit.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.