Makalah ini merupakan hasil penelitian analisis wacana kritis terhadap pemberitaan yang berkait wacana Aksi 212 di media Koran Sindo dan Media Indonesia. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui representasi Aksi 212 di kedua media tersebut. Metode yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan teori AWK Fairclough. Hasil analisis teks menunjukkan Koran Sindo telah merepresentasikan Aksi 212 ke dalam makna dan citra yang positif. Sementara itu, Media Indonesia dalam merepresentasikan Aksi 212 dibawah dominasi representasi Joko Widodo sebagai presiden yang mendapatkan apresiasi dari berbagai kalangan atas kehadirannya di Aksi 212. Pada tataran interpretasi teks Koran Sindo lebih berpihak kepada Aksi 212 dibanding Media Indonesia. Hal itu sangat terlihat dari judul berita yang disiarkan. Koran Sindo memberikan judul “Aksi Supermassa, Superdamai” sedangkan koran Media Indonesia berjudul “Presiden Banjir Pujian Datangi Peserta Aksi”. Pada tataran eksplanasi dapat disimpulkan representasi tersebut sejalan dengan konteks sosiokultural-politik yang melatarbelakangi dua media tersebut. Koran Sindo yang dipimpin Hary Tanoesudibjo dikenal dekat dengan Islam, hal itu sebagai upaya meraih dukungan muslim untuk bisnis media dan partai Perindo. Sementara itu, Media Indonesia yang tidak terlepas dari sosiopolitik Surya Paloh adalah pendukung pemerintah termasuk pendukung gubernur Ahok yang diduga (dikatakan diduga karena pada saat itu Ahok belum terbukti secara hukum menistakan agama Islam) menistakan agama Islam. (This paper is the result of critical discourse analysis research on news related to the discourse of 212 Action in Sindo and Media Indonesia newspapers. The purpose of this study is to find out the representation of 212 Action in both media. The method used is qualitative with the Fairclough AWK theory. The results of the text analysis show that Koran Sindo has represented 212 Action in a positive meaning and image. Meanwhile, Media Indonesia represents 212 Action under the domination of Joko Widodo's representation as president who gets appreciation from various circles for his presence in 212 Action. At the level of text interpretation, Sindo newspaper is more in favor of 212 Action than Media Indonesia. This is very evident from the title of the news broadcast: the Sindo newspaper gave the title "Supermassa Action, Superdamai" while the Media Indonesia newspaper entitled "The President Praised for Visiting Participants in Action". At the level of explanation, it can be concluded that the representation is in line with the socio-cultural-political context underlying the two media. The Sindo newspaper, led by Hary Tanoesudibjo, is known to be close to Islam, as an effort to gain Muslim support for the media business and the Perindo party. Meanwhile, Media Indonesia, which is inseparable from the sociopolitics of Surya Paloh, is a supporter of the government, including supporters of the Ahok, governor who is suspected of defaming Islam.)
This research is discourse analysis with qualitative methods-deskriptif.Objek this study is the fruit of political advertising Gerindra Party and Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP). The research problems are any marker of cohesion and coherence found in political advertising parati Gerindra and PDIP. Results of analysis menunujukkan cohesion markers found in the discourse of political advertising Gerindra party is katafora and reps while the discourse of political advertising PDIP is anaphora, substitution and conjunction. Meanwhile, coherence markers found in advertising Gerindra is perturutan relationship, parallelism relationship, and the relationship explanation or identification, whereas the coherence markers found in advertising discourse PDIP is perturutan relationships and relationship-knot background. These findings indicate that neither party political advertising discourse and discourse Gerindran PDIP political advertising is a good discourse and slick. Keywords: Cohesion, Coherence, Political Ads Gerindra and PDIP, Discourse Analysis
This research was written based on the hot atmosphere of the 2019 Presidential Election which has triggered the emergence of pros and cons discourses toward each pair of candidates for president and vice president. These discourses were written in a language that does not follow journalistic ethical standards, therefore, it is assumed to be vulnerable to triggering conflict. The purpose of this study was to explain the profile of some news articles about the 2019 presidential election on Situasinews.com and Seword.com from September 23, 2018 until 25 April 2019 which could trigger conflict; explain the representation of some news related to the presidential election in Situasinews.com and Seword.com from September 23 until April 25. This research used qualitative approach by using Van Dijk critical discourse analysis method. This research found that the writings related to the presidential election spreadon Facebook that was connected to Situasinews.com and Seword.com websites did not meet journalistic ethics and those writings usedsarcasm and tendentious languages that it can trigger conflicts between presidential supporters.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.