BackgroundWe examined treatment-seeking overweight and obese youths to better understand the gender, age, and treatment modality differences in generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL).MethodsThis multicenter study included 1,916 patients (mean = 12.6 years; 57% females; mean zBMI = 2.4) who started treatment for overweight and obesity in 48 treatment facilities between July 2005 and October 2006. The facilities offered either inpatient treatment or outpatient programs. Prior to treatment, all participants completed the generic KIDSCREEN-27 HRQOL-questionnaire, the self-perception subscale of the generic KIDSCREEN-52 and the disease-specific obesity module of the KINDLR.The patients' HRQOL was compared to the KIDSCREEN reference sample from the general population by one-way analyses of variance, adjusting for age, gender, and socioeconomic status. Independent t-tests were conducted to compare disease-specific HRQOL scores between patients by gender and age group. Significant mean differences in HRQOL between inpatients and outpatients were explored by one-way analyses of variance, adjusting for age, gender, and zBMI. Effect sizes 'd' were calculated employing the estimated marginal means and the pooled standard deviation (mtreatment - mnorm/SDpooled).ResultsThe patients' HRQOL scores were impaired relative to German norms, with effect sizes up to d = 1.12. The pattern of impairment was similar in boys and girls as well as in children and adolescents. In each of the analyses, at least three of six KIDSCREEN subscales were affected. Regardless of gender and age group, the highest impairments were found in self-perception and physical well-being. Because of the strong decrease in HRQOL in the general population during adolescence, compared to age-specific norms, adolescents were less impaired than were children. However, overweight and obese adolescents (especially females) reported the lowest absolute HRQOL scores. HRQOL varied with the intensity of treatment. Inpatients had significantly lower scores than did outpatients, even after adjusting for age, gender and zBMI.ConclusionsThe results suggest the presence of differences in HRQOL with regard to gender, age, and treatment modality in treatment-seeking overweight and obese youths. Research and clinical practice must consider the particular impairments of inpatients as well as the impairments of (especially female) adolescents.
Objective: Current care for overweight children is controversial, and only few data are available concerning the process of care, as well as the outcome under real-life conditions. Methods: A nationwide survey of treatment programs for overweight children and adolescents in Germany identified 480 treatment centers. From 135 institutions that had agreed to participate in this study of process of care and outcome, 48 randomly chosen institutions were included in the study. All 1916 overweight children (mean age 12.6 years, 57% female, mean body mass index 30.0 kg/m 2 ), who presented at these institutions for lifestyle interventions, were included in this study. Diagnostic procedures according to guidelines and effect of lifestyle interventions on weight status at end of treatment were analyzed. Results: Children treated o3 months were older and more obese, whereas children with 43 months treatment duration demonstrated more cardiovascular risk factors at baseline. On the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis, 75% of the children reduced their overweight. The reduction of overweight varied widely between the treatment institutions (intracluster correlation coefficient 0.15 in the multiple regression model reflecting the intracenter correlation). Screening for hypertension, disturbed glucose metabolism and dyslipidemia was performed in 52% of the children at baseline and in 10% at the end of intervention. Conclusion: Overweight reduction is achievable with lifestyle intervention in clinical practice. However, because the clientele, treatment approach and outcome varied widely between different institutions, and screening for comorbidities was seldomly performed as recommended, quality criteria for institutions have to be implemented to improve medical care of overweight children under real-life conditions.
There were only small differences between the different groups. Pronounced differences were found between the individual treatment centers. In order to improve therapy processes and outcomes, benchmarking and quality management have to be extended.
Numerous forms of therapy exist for the increasing number of obese children and adolescents in Germany, but these are heterogeneous and have not been evaluated. Access to health care, long- and short-term treatment outcome, as well as factors determining success of therapy were examined for the first time using standardized instruments to measure somatic and psychosocial variables. A total of 1,916 children aged 8-16 years from 48 (5 rehabilitation, 43 outpatient) institutions were examined. Data were collected for height, weight, blood pressure, and lipid status before treatment started (t0), at the end of treatment (t1), and 1 year after completion of treatment (t2). Furthermore, psychosocial variables were documented using questionnaires for parents and children. The mean BMI-SDS (body mass index standard deviation score) reduction at t1 was -0.27 and 1 year later at t2 was -0.23 (per protocol analysis; intention to treat: t1=-0.24; t2=-0.06). Psychological health and quality of life, which were markedly impaired at the beginning, improved. However, physical activity, media consumption, and nutrition remained basically unchanged. A reduction in weight is associated with an improvement in cardiovascular risk profiles, and long-term behavior changes are possible. However, the institutions differed considerably in the percentage of follow-up examinations and in the weight reduction accomplished.
The Hamburg University Hospital (UKE), together with the German Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA), conducted a nationwide screening of obesity-related care. The screening was composed of two stages: Firstly, a short questionnaire of 150 items was developed and validated by experts. It comprised 14 summary criteria, derived from obesity care guidelines. The most important aspects of the providers' services were surveyed. This resulted in a description of intervention quality in 492 institutions or programs on a national level, controlled for representativity, and analyses of quality in specific institutional types. Secondly, a sample of 38 interventions was selected, using cluster analysis, and assessed in depth by means of the quality assurance system QIP (Quality in Prevention), extended to include obesity-related criteria from medical guidelines. The main results of the survey were as follows: Only 51.4 % of the guideline-based quality criteria were met by an average program. The costs of the various programs differed vastly but predicted the intervention quality only to a moderate degree. Two thirds of the programs were offered by outpatient care institutions. The screening documented that there was a lack of setting-related projects. On the basis of the findings, a registration system for projects and programs, based upon evidence-based quality criteria, is proposed. Furthermore, outpatient services and projects should be strengthened, and setting-based interventions should be developed, enhanced by a national strategy of obesity prevention on several policy levels, according to WHO recommendations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.