The processing of stress responses involves brain-wide communication among cortical and subcortical regions; however, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we show that the claustrum (CLA) is crucial for the control of stress-induced anxiety-related behaviors. A combined approach using brain activation mapping and machine learning showed that the CLA activation serves as a reliable marker of exposure to acute stressors. In TRAP2 mice, which allow activity-dependent genetic labeling, chemogenetic activation of the CLA neuronal ensemble tagged by acute social defeat stress (DS) elicited anxiety-related behaviors, whereas silencing of the CLA ensemble attenuated DS-induced anxiety-related behaviors. Moreover, the CLA received strong input from DS-activated basolateral amygdala neurons, and its circuit-selective optogenetic photostimulation temporarily elicited anxiety-related behaviors. Last, silencing of the CLA ensemble during stress exposure increased resistance to chronic DS. The CLA thus bidirectionally controls stress-induced emotional responses, and its inactivation can serve as a preventative strategy to increase stress resilience.

Background Although recent studies provide insight into the molecular mechanisms of the effects of ketamine, the antidepressant mechanism of ketamine enantiomers and their metabolites is not fully understood. In view of the involvement of mechanisms other than the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor in ketamine’s action, we investigated the effects of (R)-ketamine, (S)-ketamine, (R)-norketamine [(R)-NK], (S)-NK, (2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine [(2R,6R)-HNK], and (2S,6S)-HNK on monoaminergic neurotransmission in the prefrontal cortex of mice. Methods The extracellular monoamine levels in the prefrontal cortex were measured by in vivo microdialysis. Results (R)-Ketamine and (S)-ketamine acutely increased serotonin release in a dose-dependent manner, and the effect of (R)-ketamine was greater than that of (S)-ketamine. In contrast, (S)-ketamine caused a robust increase in dopamine release compared with (R)-ketamine. Both ketamine enantiomers increased noradrenaline release, but these effects did not differ. (2R,6R)-HNK caused a slight but significant increase in serotonin and noradrenaline but not dopamine release. (S)-NK increased dopamine and noradrenaline but not serotonin release. Differential effects between (R)-ketamine and (S)-ketamine were also observed in a lipopolysaccharide-induced model of depression. An α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist, 2,3-dioxo-6-nitro-1,2,3,4- tetrahydrobenzo[f]quinoxaline-7-sulfonamide (NBQX), attenuated (S)-ketamine-induced, but not (R)-ketamine-induced serotonin release, whereas NBQX blocked dopamine release induced by both enantiomers. Local application of (R)-ketamine into the prefrontal cortex caused a greater increase in prefrontal serotonin release than that of (S)-ketamine. Conclusions (R)-Ketamine strongly activates the prefrontal serotonergic system through an AMPA receptor-independent mechanism. (S)-Ketamine-induced serotonin and dopamine release was AMPA receptor-dependent. These findings provide a neurochemical basis for the underlying pharmacological differences between ketamine enantiomers and their metabolites.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract