Coronary patterns with intramural arteries remain associated with high coronary mortality and morbidity following neonatal ASO, even in the current era. The association of slit-like deformation of the ostium, stenosis of the intramural course and abnormal angle of take-off might explain the difficulty in coronary transfer. The technique of coronary transfer should be individually adapted to each anatomical situation. The place of patch ostioplasty of the intramural artery remains to be determined.

The FRANCE-2 registry represents the largest database available on late results of TAVR. Late mortality is largely related to noncardiac causes. Incidence rates of severe events are low after the first month. Valve performance remains stable over time.

Anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries (left coronary from right sinus or right coronary from left sinus) is a rare congenital defect, which carries a high risk of sudden cardiac death. The risk is particularly high when the interarterial course between the great arteries has an intramural segment, or is hypoplastic/stenotic, or has an abnormal orifice. Various surgical techniques have been used, including coronary artery bypass grafting, pulmonary artery translocation, partial or complete unroofing of the intramural course and patch enlargement of the interarterial course. We favour 'anatomical' repair that creates an enlarged neo-ostium into the appropriate sinus, eliminates completely the intramural segment and restores a normal angle of take-off. Reimplantation of the anomalous coronary artery may be indicated in variants without an intramural course. Surgical correction is mandatory for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with evidence of myocardial ischaemia under stress; it is recommended in asymptomatic patients with high-risk variants (anomalous left coronary artery with the intramural course), particularly in young patients with strenuous activities.

In neonates with isolated ccTGA, prophylactic PA banding is safe and carries a low morbidity. At mid-term evaluation, tricuspid valve function is stabilised or improved and systemic competence of the left ventricle is maintained, thus allowing double switch if indicated.

OBJECTIVES Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is the second leading cause of sudden death in children and young adults. The most threatening anatomy is an interarterial and an intramural course, both probably involved in ischaemic phenomena and sudden death. The treatment of interarterial AAOCA remains controversial. Most of the published studies describe the results of the unroofing technique. Our study aims to evaluate the results of a different surgical approach. METHODS From 2005 to 2019, 61 patients were operated on for an interarterial AAOCA (median age 14.7 years). Forty patients had a right AAOCA, and 21 patients had a left AAOCA including 5 patients with intraseptal course. Seventy percent of patients were symptomatic. Five patients had an aborted sudden cardiac death. Two surgical techniques were used: an ‘anatomical’ repair for 35 patients (15 left and 22 right AAOCA) or a coronary translocation with creation of a neo-ostia in 19 patients (1 left and 18 right AAOCA). The 5 left AAOCA patients with an intra-septal course required a complete release of the coronary artery from the septum. RESULTS There was no early or late postoperative death. Three patients had an acute postoperative ischaemic event. Two patients required immediate angioplasty and stenting: 1 patient (7 years) with a hypoplastic right AAOCA and 1 patient (66 years) for inadequate tailoring after septal release. The third patient required an immediate surgical revision (H-2) for left AAOCA thrombosis at the level of the pericardial patch with full myocardial recovery at discharge. During follow-up, 1 patient with right AAOCA translocation and chronic chest pain required subsequent stenting and finally a coronary artery bypass grafting 2 years after initial surgery. One patient who had an asymptomatic mild right coronary stenosis 1 year after anatomical repair was successfully treated by angioplasty alone. All patients but 1 who underwent coronary translocation are totally asymptomatic. All patients with anatomical repair or septal release are free from ischaemic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Anatomical repair might provide a better protective option for these patients. Unlike unroofing, it treats the entire intramural segment, relocates the ostium at the appropriate sinus level and corrects any acute take-off angle.

OBJECTIVES The main challenge of aortic coarctation (CoA) repair in infants is to obtain durable results without morbidity. We aimed to describe predictors of aortic arch reintervention after aortic CoA repair. METHODS Between January 2000 and March 2014, we retrospectively included consecutive infants with isolated CoA or CoA with ventricular septal defect (CoA + VSD) who had surgical repair of the aortic arch before 3 months of age. RESULTS Five hundred and thirty patients were included: 308 (58%) patients had isolated CoA and 222 (42%) patients had CoA + VSD. Three hundred and eighty-five patients (72.6%) had CoA repair, 51 patients (9.6%) had CoA repair with closure of VSD and 94 patients (17.8%) had CoA repair with pulmonary artery banding. Mean age at operation was 13 ± 1.6 days, with 294 patients (55.5%) operated on before 2 weeks. Median follow-up was 7.57 years. Sixty-one patients (11.5%) needed reintervention on the aortic arch. Freedom from aortic arch reintervention was 90% at 1 year and 88.5% at 5 years. Proportions of aortic arch reintervention were similar in the different surgical strategy groups (P = 0.80). However, in patients receiving prostaglandin E1 (PGE1), the end-to-end repair was at higher risk of recoarctation compared to the extended end-to-side repair (P = 0.033). The risk factors of aortic arch reintervention were age at repair <15 days (P = 0.034) and the need for PGE1 infusion at surgery (P = 0.0043). CONCLUSIONS CoA repair in young infants has an overall good outcome. The use of PGE1 may modify the aortic arch anatomy and mask the boundaries of the resection to be performed. PGE1 treatment should be studied more specifically in another study to improve preoperative management.

Hospital deaths after the RVPA connection were low. The procedure allowed good growth of the native pulmonary artery. Biventricular repair was possible in a large number of cases. The late morbidity rate remains significant. Early reinterventions could be avoided by appropriate calibration. This technique appears to be suitable for any type of PA/VSD with central pulmonary arteries.

Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation is a new treatment option in patients with dysfunctional conduits. The aim of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation is to prolong the lifespan of right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduits and thereby postponing open-heart surgery. Early results have shown a significant reduction in right ventricular pressure and right ventricular outflow tract gradient. During a follow-up of a median of 28 months, freedom from re-operation is 93 (2), 86 (3), 84 (4), and 70 (13)% at 10, 30, 50, and 70 months, respectively. The most common complication during follow-up are stent fractures with an incidence around 20%. Although clinically silent in the majority of cases, stent fractures led to re-intervention in the form of implantation of a second device (valve-in-valve). Valvar function during follow-up was well maintained. Significant pulmonary regurgitation was only seen in the context of endocarditis. Pulmonary valve implantation has the potential to become the standard procedure in the treatment of dysfunctional conduits. Bigger challenges will now have to be met in order to extend this technology to patients with native outflow tracts and free pulmonary regurgitation.