This paper considers and examines the extent of the applicability of the principles of fair hearing in administrative adjudication in Nigeria. The paper holds the view that administrative adjudicatory bodies are compulsorily bound by the principles of fair hearing as most of their functions affect the rights and obligations of individuals appearing before them. Bearing in mind that these principles of fair hearing (and others ancillary to them) are however not straight jacket principles, hence this paper. In achieving this purpose, the paper adopts the thematic and doctrinal methods of research. The paper adopts the analytical, critical, expository and comparative methods of presentation, with copious reference to the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria; Textbooks on Constitutional and Administrative Law and Human Rights Law; Statute books; Law Reports (Case Laws); National Assembly Gazettes, Local and International Journals as primary and secondary sources of material on the subject-matter.
Corruption in Nigeria is so notorious that data and statistics are no longer necessary to prove and establish that the proportion is endemic. Corruption, no doubts, has eaten deep into the fabrics of the Nigerian polity and system, so much so that it has become convenient to offer justification for some kind public malfeasance in other to categorize them as a class of public misconduct outside corruption. Those who engage in the act of corruption now call it by different names in other to excuse themselves from the damning effect and opprobrium associated with corruption. Acts of stealing and embezzling public funds in Nigeria are now termed ‘stealing’ simpliciter, hence the ignoble coinage ‘stealing is not corruption.’ This has become convenient and common place in the public sphere because our laws failed to give a definite definition and make clear provision on the scope of the subject matter of corruption. This has compounded the confusion as to the scope of the offence of corruption in Nigeria, as the offence-creating statutes in their provisions on corruption, fail to cover and integrate as corruption various acts which are globally recognised as corruption. This paper is thus set out to critically examine the extent and a scope of the offence of corruption in Nigeria and to determine its true scope. The paper undertook the examination of relevant statutes touching on offences of corruption with a view to pointing out generally, the inadequacies of our laws in this regards and to clarify and identity certain class of corrupt practices that are not specifically provided for. The methodology is thematic, while the presentation approach is expository, analytical, critical and comparative. It undertook a discussion of the subject matter by way of critical analyse of relevant themes and examination and assessment on the relevant laws and opinions related to the subject matter.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.