Summary Background Global HIV programs continue to experience challenges achieving the high rates of HIV testing and treatment needed to optimize health and reduce transmission. Botswana represents a useful “demonstration case” in assessing the feasibility of achieving the new UNAIDS targets for 2020: 90% of all persons living with HIV knowing their status, 90% of these individuals receiving sustained antiretroviral treatment (ART), and 90% of those on ART having virologic suppression (“90–90–90”). Methods A population-based random sample of individuals was recruited and interviewed in 30 rural and peri-urban communities from October 2013 to November 2015 in Botswana as part of a large, ongoing PEPFAR-funded community-randomized trial designed to evaluate the impact of a combination prevention package on HIV incidence. A random sample of approximately 20% of households in each of these 30 communities was selected. Consenting household residents aged 16–64 years who were Botswana citizens or spouses of citizens responded to a questionnaire and had blood drawn for HIV testing in absence of documentation of positive HIV status. HIV-1 RNA testing was performed in all HIV-infected participants, regardless of treatment status. Findings Eighty-one percent of enumerated eligible household members took part in the survey (10% refused and 9% were absent). Among 12,610 participants surveyed, 3,596 (29%) were HIV infected; 2,995 (83·3%) of these individuals already knew their HIV status. Among those who knew their HIV status, 2,617 (87·4%) were currently receiving ART (this represented 95% of those eligible for ART by current Botswana national guidelines, and 73% of all HIV-infected persons). We obtained an HIV-1 RNA result in 99·7% of HIV-infected participants. Of the 2,609 individuals currently receiving ART with a viral load measurement, 2,517 (96·5%) had HIV-1 RNA ≤400 copies/mL. Overall, 70·2% of HIV-infected persons had virologic suppression, close to the UNAIDS target of 73%. Results of three sensitivity analyses to account for possible uncertainty due to non-participation and under-representation of urban areas, revealed somewhat lower, but nevertheless remarkably high 90–90–90 coverage. Interpretation Botswana, a resource-constrained setting with high HIV prevalence, appears to have achieved very high rates of HIV testing, treatment coverage, and virologic suppression for those on ART in this population-based survey, despite the Botswana ART initiation threshold of ≤350 cells/mm3. These findings provide evidence that the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets, while ambitious, are achievable even in resource-constrained settings with high HIV burden. Funding The United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

BACKGROUND-The feasibility of reducing the population-level incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection by increasing community coverage of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and male circumcision is unknown.METHODS-We conducted a pair-matched, community-randomized trial in 30 rural or periurban communities in Botswana from 2013 to 2018. Participants in 15 villages in the intervention group received HIV testing and counseling, linkage to care, ART (started at a higher CD4 count than in standard care), and increased access to male circumcision services. The standard-care group also consisted of 15 villages. Universal ART became available in both groups in mid-2016. We enrolled a random sample of participants from approximately 20% of households in each community and measured the incidence of HIV infection through testing performed approximately once per year. The prespecified primary analysis was a permutation test of HIV incidence ratios.

BackgroundEnsuring that data collected through national health information systems are of sufficient quality for meaningful interpretation is a challenge in many resource-limited countries. An assessment was conducted to identify strengths and weaknesses of the health data management and reporting systems that capture and transfer routine monitoring and evaluation (M&E) data in Botswana.MethodsThis was a descriptive, qualitative assessment. In-depth interviews were conducted at the national (n = 27), district (n = 31), and facility/community (n = 71) levels to assess i) M&E structures, functions, and capabilities; ii) indicator definitions and reporting guidelines; iii) data collection forms and tools; iv) data management processes; and v) links with the national reporting system. A framework analysis was conducted using ATLAS.ti v6.1.ResultsHealth programs generally had standardized data collection and reporting tools and defined personnel for M&E responsibilities at the national and district levels. Best practices unique to individual health programs were identified and included a variety of relatively low-resource initiatives such as attention to staffing patterns, making health data more accessible for evidence-based decision-making, developing a single source of information related to indicator definitions, data collection tools, and management processes, and utilization of supportive supervision visits to districts and facilities. Weakness included limited ownership of M&E-related duties within facilities, a lack of tertiary training programs to build M&E skills, few standard practices related to confidentiality and document storage, limited dissemination of indicator definitions, and limited functionality of electronic data management systems.ConclusionsAddressing fundamental M&E system issues, further standardization of M&E practices, and increasing health services management responsiveness to time-sensitive information are critical to sustain progress related to health service delivery in Botswana. In addition to high-resource initiatives, such as investments in electronic medical record systems and tertiary training programs, there are a variety of low-resource initiatives, such as regular data quality checks, that can strengthen national health information systems. Applying best practices that are effective within one health program to data management and reporting systems of other programs is a practical approach for strengthening health informatics and improving data quality.

DesignUniversal voluntary HIV counselling and testing followed by prompt initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all those diagnosed HIV‐infected (universal test and treat, UTT) is now a global health standard. However, its population‐level impact, feasibility and cost remain unknown. Five community‐based trials have been implemented in sub‐Saharan Africa to measure the effects of various UTT strategies at population level: BCPP/YaTsie in Botswana, Max ART in Swaziland, HPTN 071 (PopART) in South Africa and Zambia, SEARCH in Uganda and Kenya and ANRS 12249 TasP in South Africa. This report describes and contrasts the contexts, research methodologies, intervention packages, themes explored, evolution of study designs and interventions related to each of these five UTT trials.MethodsWe conducted a comparative assessment of the five trials using data extracted from study protocols and collected during baseline studies, with additional input from study investigators. We organized differences and commonalities across the trials in five categories: trial contexts, research designs, intervention packages, trial themes and adaptations.ResultsAll performed in the context of generalized HIV epidemics, the trials highly differ in their social, demographic, economic, political and health systems settings. They share the common aim of assessing the impact of UTT on the HIV epidemic but differ in methodological aspects such as study design and eligibility criteria for trial populations. In addition to universal ART initiation, the trials deliver a wide range of biomedical, behavioural and structural interventions as part of their UTT strategies. The five studies explore common issues, including the uptake rates of the trial services and individual health outcomes. All trials have adapted since their initiation to the evolving political, economic and public health contexts, including adopting the successive national recommendations for ART initiation.ConclusionsWe found substantial commonalities but also differences between the five UTT trials in their design, conduct and multidisciplinary outputs. As empirical literature on how UTT may improve efficiency and quality of HIV care at population level is still scarce, this article provides a foundation for more collaborative research on UTT and supports evidence‐based decision making for HIV care in country and internationally.

No abstract