No abstract

No abstract

Recently, there has been a move encouraged by many stakeholders towards generating big, open data in many areas of research. One area where big, open data is particularly valuable is in research relating to complex heterogeneous disorders such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The inconsistencies of findings and the great heterogeneity of ASD necessitate the use of big and open data to tackle important challenges such as understanding and defining the heterogeneity and potential subtypes of ASD. To this end, a number of initiatives have been established that aim to develop big and/or open data resources for autism research. In order to provide a useful data reference for autism researchers, a systematic search for ASD data resources was conducted using the Scopus database, the Google search engine, and the pages on ‘recommended repositories’ by key journals, and the findings were translated into a comprehensive list focused on ASD data. The aim of this review is to systematically search for all available ASD data resources providing the following data types: phenotypic, neuroimaging, human brain connectivity matrices, human brain statistical maps, biospecimens, and ASD participant recruitment. A total of 33 resources were found containing different types of data from varying numbers of participants. Description of the data available from each data resource, and links to each resource is provided. Moreover, key implications are addressed and underrepresented areas of data are identified.

Copy number variations (CNVs) at the 16p11.2 chromosomal region are associated with myriad clinical features including intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. The aim of this study is to determine whether 16p11.2 deletion (DEL) and duplication (DUP) carriers demonstrate a distinct and reciprocal pattern of electroencephalography (EEG) activity as represented by neural variability measures. EEG data were previously collected as part of the Simons Variation in Individuals Project. Variability measures, as estimated by single-trial ERP and spectral power analyses in the alpha and beta frequency bands, in addition to signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), were analyzed in DEL (n = 20), DUP (n = 8), and typical (n = 11) groups. We also analyzed mean visual evoked potentials and spectral power (alpha and beta power) to facilitate comparisons with other studies of associated disorders and CNVs. From measures of single-trial variability, we found higher intraparticipant variability in P1 amplitude and timecourse amplitude in DEL compared to controls. Compared to DUP, DEL showed higher variability in absolute alpha and absolute beta power but lower variability in P1 latency. SNRs did not differ between the groups. From measures of amplitude, latency, and spectral power, DUP showed lower relative alpha power compared to controls. Although it is yet unclear whether 16p11.2 CNV dosage impacts neural activity in an opposing manner, findings suggest that 16p11.2 DEL impacts the level of variability of neural responses. Higher neural variability may play a role in a range of cognitive processes in 16p11.2 CNV carriers.Lay Summary: The study analyzed the consistency of patterns of brain waves and rhythms in those affected with a loss or gain of DNA material in the 16p11.2 region. Compared with typical individuals, 16p11.2 deletion carriers showed greater inconsistency in the way the brain responds to the same visual event. This high inconsistency in brain activity may play a role in some core symptoms in 16p11.2 copy number variation carriers.

Deletions and duplications at the chromosomal region of 16p11.2 have a broad range of phenotypic effects including increased likelihood of intellectual disability, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), epilepsy, and language and motor delays. However, whether and how sensory processing is affected has not yet been considered in detail. Parents/caregivers of 38 children with a 16p11.2 deletion and 31 children with a 16p11.2 duplication completed the Sensory Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) and the Child Sensory Profile 2 (CSP‐2) along with other standardized questionnaires assessing autistic traits (SRS‐2), ADHD traits (Conners 3), anxiety (SCAS‐P) and adaptive behavior (VABS‐3). SBQ and CSP‐2 responses found that sensory processing differences were clearly evident in both 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication, though there was significant variation in both cohorts. SBQ data indicated the frequency and impact of sensory behavior were more severe when compared to neurotypical children, with levels being similar to autistic children. CSP‐2 data indicated over 70% of children displayed clear differences in sensory registration (missing sensory input). Seventy‐one percent with 16p11.2 duplications were also unusually sensitive to sensory information and 57% with 16p11.2 duplications were unusually avoidant of sensory stimuli. This first detailed assessment of sensory processing, alongside other clinical features, in relatively large cohorts of children with a 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication demonstrates that sensory processing differences have a profound impact on their lives.