No abstract

No abstract

It has been reported that large cranial osteonecrotic areas can heal. It was hypothesized that optimal healing is possible by the synchronized contribution of the osteogenic structures (periosteum, dura, and adjacent bone) that envelop the necrotic cranium. This hypothesis was tested by preserving or isolating the contribution of these osteogenic tissues. A total of 37 4-old-month rats were included in the study. Twelve animals were killed immediately, and cranial bone samples were taken and processed for examination (from 6 animals as fresh samples [Group A] and from the rest as autoclaved samples [Group B]). Group B was created to test if the bone was completely nonviable. In Group C (n = 25), cranial bone disks 8 mm in diameter were taken from 4-month-old rats, autoclaved, and put back onto the defect area. This group was further divided into the four Subgroups C1 through C4 (n = 7 in C3; n = 6 in C1, C2, and C4). Dura mater was isolated from the overlying bone disk with a polytetrafluoroethylene sheet in Subgroups C1 and C2, whereas the bone contacted the dura in the rest. The bone samples were covered with healthy periosteum in Subgroups C1 and C3 and with skin in Subgroups C3 and C4. These animals were killed after a healing period of 12 weeks, and the relevant bone disks were obtained. Surrounding healthy bone was also harvested from the same animals after they were killed to create Group D. The data of Group A and D were compared with those of the experimental group to comment on the degree of bone healing in the latter group. Quantitative and qualitative assessment was performed by mammography, bone densitometry, computed tomography, and histological examinations to find out the density and cellular content (osteocytes and vessels) of the samples. Examination of Group B samples showed nonviable tissue with a preserved microstructure. Analysis of other samples showed that both the periosteum and, mainly, the dura play an important role in cranial bone healing. The periosteal reaction was observed to be more evident when the dura was not separated. Cellular repopulation was more evident when both structures contributed to the healing process. Newly formed bone progressed centripetally; however, adjacent bone without the support of the dura and periosteum was capable of producing limited neovascularization and bone formation.

Scalp layers are widely used in reconstructive procedures. The authors used prefabricated galeal flaps based on the superficial temporal or postauricular vessels for ear, cheek, mandible, and cranium reconstructions in three cases. In case 1, synchronous beard and ear reconstructions were accomplished by using the temporoparietal and retroauricular flaps. In case 2, a buccomandibular defect was reconstructed by transposing the supra-auricular and retroauricular galea with prefabricated bone and skin. In case 3, an epidural hematoma in the left frontoparietal area was evacuated after a circular craniectomy. The harvested bone was not put back on the defect area but buried between the periosteal and galeal layers because of brain edema. These layers were raised as an osteogaleoperiosteal flap and transposed onto the defect area after 7 weeks. When used with a prefabrication method, scalp layers offer versatile options for repairing composite defects of the head region. A galeal flap based on the posterior auricular vessels is practical and reliable in reconstructive procedures. The authors suggest that this flap is an option in cases in which the temporoparietal fascia artery or the superficial temporal artery is not available. Prefabrication of the harvested cranial bone inside the adjacent tissues offers several advantages in that a viable bone is provided at the end of the procedure, intervention at a distant area is avoided, the graft is placed on osteogenic tissue (periosteum) that is also transposed onto the defect, and sophisticated procedures such as microsurgical techniques are not needed.

Reconstruction of cranial defects larger than 2 to 3 cm in diameter and frontal defects of any size is indicated for mechanical protection and cosmetic reasons. The authors used osteogaleal flaps for cranioplasty in 2 pediatric patients with the aim of decreasing infection risk and maximizing bone healing. In the first patient, bone was harvested from the diploë. Children's cranial bones are thin, and in the second patient the authors used full-thickness grafts of adjacent bone, splitting this into three pieces to cover the recipient and donor sites. The postoperative period was uneventful for both children. Scintigraphic studies performed the first week after surgery revealed uptake in the flaps. Computed tomography demonstrated rapid bone healing with good contouring. The scintigraphic findings and rapid bone healing suggest that the bone component of the osteogaleal flap nourishes the graft site with blood from the galea and the periosteum. These flaps are an ideal choice for reconstruction of cranial defects because of their membranous origin, ease of harvest, applicability to any part of the calvarium, and reliable vascularity.

Various methods and ancillary procedures have been defined in the era of face-lifting surgery.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the esthetic outcomes of our face-neck cases and the importance of adding ancillary procedures based on individual assessment.We conducted a retrospective review of 203 face-neck cases, basically following the endoscopic and open principles of Vasconez. The ancillary procedures added in selected cases included genioplasty, augmentation with autologous facial superficial fascial tissue or fat injections, upper lip shortening, perioral dermabrasion, ear lobe reduction, buccal fat reduction, mentum lifting, and upper orbital rim shaving. Complications, postoperative follow-up, esthetic outcomes, and contribution of the ancillary procedures were recorded.Our esthetic face complication rates were comparable to those of previous studies and included chemosis, hematoma, cyst on the eyelid suture line, skin sloughing, scar abnormalities (hypertrophic scar and widespread scar), pseudoparalysis of the marginal mandibular branch, temporary hypoesthesia of the forehead, irregularity of the glabella after endoscopy, and asymmetry. We did not observe any comorbidity owing to genioplasty and augmentation with autologous tissue except for a case with infection after fat injection.More improvement can be obtained with careful planning of ancillary procedures in face-neck lifting surgery.

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Eyelids and related structures such as ligamentous and lacrimal system make the reconstruction of the periorbital area a challenge. The authors present 5 patients with periorbital reconstruction after tumor excision or trauma with special considerations. A detailed analysis of the problem and reconstruction of all of the injured systems or structures are mandatory to achieve a satisfactory result on the periorbital area.