This article evaluates whether providing coaching between practice sessions in teacher education courses leads to more rapid development of skills and changes in teachers’ beliefs about student behavior, using mixed-reality simulations as a practice space and standardized assessment platform. We randomly assigned 105 prospective teachers to different coaching conditions between simulation sessions integrated into a teacher preparation program. Coached candidates had significant and large improvements on skills relative to those who only reflected on their teaching. We also observe significant coaching effects on candidates’ perceptions of student behavior and ideas about next steps for addressing perceived behavioral issues. Findings suggest that skills with which novices struggle can improve with coaching and do not have to be learned “on the job.”
edTPA is designed to strengthen teacher professionalization and provide a framework for program redesign. However, using a national assessment to shift the content of local programs is challenging because of their inherent organizational complexity. In this article, we focus on this complexity, using a systems lens to analyze edTPA implementation at a large, public university. Employing a mixed-methods case study design, we survey 250 teacher educators and candidates to understand how they interpret the demands of edTPA and how their varied perspectives impact each other. We interview a stratified, purposive subset of participants to explore mechanisms underlying quantitative findings. We find substantial internal variation in edTPA implementation that translates into differential support for candidates. This variation could not be explained by duration of implementation of edTPA. Varied perspectives may stem from distinct perceptions of teacher educators’ professional roles and the role they see edTPA playing in teacher professionalization.
Teacher education research is in still in the process of developing a robust set of tools that can measure the key features of coursework and fieldwork. This article focuses on the design of measures of “opportunities to learn” (OTLs) in content method courses that can be used across large populations of candidates at diverse preparation programs. We draw on the survey and interview data from a broader, longitudinal study of teacher preparation across four programs in the United States ( n = 455 candidates). Variance decomposition suggests far greater within-program variation than between-program variation in reported OTL. More nuanced analyses at a single university indicate significant associations between individual characteristics and reports of OTL, suggesting that self-reports of OTL may tell us more about the candidates who complete a survey than the programs that prepare them. Discussion focuses on implications for teacher education research and next steps for studying OTL in methods coursework.
The adoption of “College and Career Ready” standards—including Common Core State Standards—aims to raise academic expectations for students nationwide. Meeting these outcomes requires shifts in teaching, which, in turn, requires developing measures for the observation, assessment, and support of new kinds of instruction. This essay focuses on our efforts to develop such measures in a research project conducted in the District of Columbia Public Schools, which raised fundamental questions about whether existing measures can meet this challenge. By emphasizing observable elements of individual lessons, current measures produce a restricted view of instructional quality, omitting crucial elements of instruction called forth by new standards. Having identified this disconnect, we offer suggestions for developing multi-measure systems to capture a fuller picture of standards aligned teaching.
Background/Context Many elementary teacher education programs seek to prepare candidates to enact ambitious mathematics instruction that supports students in engaging in rigorous, conceptually rich mathematics tasks. Extant literature suggests that preparedness to engage in ambitious elementary mathematics instruction is multifaceted and includes teaching candidates’ mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT), self-efficacy with regard to teaching mathematics, and pedagogical beliefs about mathematics. Prior research has produced findings that provide discrete, and at times conflicting, information about teacher preparation. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study This study examined how elementary candidates’ learning opportunities in mathematics content courses, mathematics methods courses, and student teaching were moderated by their reports about the quality of their experiences in courses and field placements to seem to affect their MKT, self-efficacy, and beliefs. Population/Participants/Subjects The study participants were 220 elementary teaching candidates who were in their final year of teacher preparation at four universities in three states. Research Design We employed multivariate path analysis, an approach that is purposefully designed to probe heterogeneity in teaching candidates’ experiences in courses and clinical placements. Data Collection and Analysis We administered two surveys to each study participant: an elementary teaching candidate survey, which included measures of mathematics teaching self-efficacy and pedagogical beliefs about mathematics, and an MKT survey. Findings/Results The number of mathematics content courses that elementary candidates took was positively associated with their MKT and mathematics teaching self-efficacy only when they also reported having positive experiences learning mathematics. When candidates reported increased opportunities to engage with representations, decompositions, and approximations of mathematics teaching practices in mathematics methods courses, this was associated with higher MKT scores and pedagogical beliefs about mathematics. When candidates reported that their cooperating teacher was a high-quality mentor, increased opportunities to observe, attempt, and receive feedback on mathematics teaching practices during their field experience were associated with mathematics teaching self-efficacy and pedagogical beliefs about mathematics. Conclusions/Recommendations The findings from this multivariate path analysis, which account for both the reported quantity and the perceived quality of elementary teaching candidate experiences, may shed light on conflicting findings in prior literature. There is little agreement in extant literature about associations between facets of teacher preparation and candidate knowledge, self-efficacy, or beliefs. Explaining the positive associations in some samples and lack of associations in others may have more to do with the quality of teaching candidate experiences than with whether a candidate was exposed to a particular opportunity to learn.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.