New Findings What is the central question of this study? Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is a common functional test to assess brain health, and impaired CVR has been associated with all‐cause cardiovascular mortality: does the duration of the CO2 stimulus and the time point used for data extraction alter the CVR outcome measure? What is the main finding and its importance? This study demonstrated CVR measures calculated from 1 and 2 min CO2 stimulus durations were significantly higher than CVR calculated from a 4 min CO2 stimulus. CVRs calculated from the first 2 min of the CO2 stimulus were significantly higher than CVR values calculated from the final minute if the duration was ≥4 min. This study highlights the need for consistent methodological approaches. AbstractCerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide (CVR) is a common functional test to assess brain vascular health, though conflicting age and fitness effects have been reported. Studies have used different CO2 stimulus durations to induce CVR and extracted data from different time points for analysis. Therefore, this study examined whether these differences alter CVR and explain conflicting findings. Eighteen healthy volunteers (24 ± 5 years) inhaled CO2 for four stimulus durations (1, 2, 4 and 5 min) of 5% CO2 (in air) via the open‐circuit Douglas bag method, in a randomized order. CVR data were derived from transcranial Doppler (TCD) measures of middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv), with concurrent ventilatory sensitivity to the CO2 stimulus ( ). Repeated measures ANOVAs compared CVR and measures between stimulus durations and steady‐state time points. An effect of stimulus duration was observed (P = 0.002, η² = 0.140), with 1 min (P = 0.010) and 2 min (P < 0.001) differing from 4 min, and 2 min differing from 5 min (P = 0.019) durations. sensitivity increased ∼3‐fold from 1 min to 4 and 5 min durations (P < 0.001, η² = 0.485). CVRs calculated from different steady‐state time points within each stimulus duration were different (P < 0.001, η² = 0.454), specifically for 4 min (P = 0.001) and 5 min (P < 0.001), but not 2 min stimulus durations (P = 0.273). These findings demonstrate that methodological differences alter the CVR measure.

Our findings indicate an important role for cerebral blood flow regulation in the pathophysiology of central sleep apnea at high altitude.

New FindingsWhat is the central question of this study?The relationship between changes in cerebral blood flow and arterial carbon dioxide tension is used to assess cerebrovascular function. Hypercapnia is generally evoked by two methods, i.e. steady-state and transient increases in carbon dioxide tension. In some cases, the hypercapnia is immediately preceded by a period of hypocapnia. It is unknown whether the cerebrovascular response differs between these methods and whether a period of hypocapnia blunts the subsequent response to hypercapnia.What is the main finding and its importance?The cerebrovascular response is similar between steady-state and transient hypercapnia. However, hyperventilation-induced hypocapnia attenuates the cerebral vasodilatory responses during a subsequent period of rebreathing-induced hypercapnia.Cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVMR) to changes in arterial carbon dioxide tension () is assessed during steady-state or transient changes in . This study tested the following two hypotheses: (i) that CVMR during steady-state changes differs from that during transient changes in ; and (ii) that CVMR during rebreathing-induced hypercapnia would be blunted when preceded by a period of hyperventilation. For each hypothesis, end-tidal carbon dioxide tension () middle cerebral artery blood velocity (CBFV), cerebrovascular conductance index (CVCI; CBFV/mean arterial pressure) and CVMR (slope of the linear regression between changes in CBFV and CVCI versus ) were assessed in eight individuals. To address the first hypothesis, measurements were made during the following two conditions (randomized): (i) steady-state increases in of 5 and 10 Torr above baseline; and (ii) rebreathing-induced transient breath-by-breath increases in . The linear regression for CBFV versus (P = 0.65) and CVCI versus (P = 0.44) was similar between methods; however, individual variability in CBFV or CVCI responses existed among subjects. To address the second hypothesis, the same measurements were made during the following two conditions (randomized): (i) immediately following a brief period of hypocapnia induced by hyperventilation for 1 min followed by rebreathing; and (ii) during rebreathing only. The slope of the linear regression for CBFV versus (P < 0.01) and CVCI versus (P < 0.01) was reduced during hyperventilation plus rebreathing relative to rebreathing only. These results indicate that cerebral vasomotor reactivity to changes in is similar regardless of the employed methodology to induce changes in and that hyperventilation-induced hypocapnia attenuates the cerebral vasodilatory responses during a subsequent period of rebreathing-induced hypercapnia.