Eculizumab inhibited complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy and was associated with significant time-dependent improvement in renal function in patients with atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. (Funded by Alexion Pharmaceuticals; C08-002 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00844545 [adults] and NCT00844844 [adolescents]; C08-003 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00838513 [adults] and NCT00844428 [adolescents]).

After renal transplantation, hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) may occur either as a recurrent or de novo form. Over the past decade, much effort has been devoted to elucidating the pathogenesis of atypical HUS (aHUS). Approximately 60-70% patients with aHUS have mutations in regulatory factors of the complement system or antibodies against complement factor H. The risk of post-transplant recurrence of aHUS depends on the genetic abnormality involved, and ranges from 15% to 20% in patients with mutations in the gene that encodes membrane cofactor protein and from 50% to 100% in patients with mutations in the genes that encode circulating regulators of complement. Given the poor outcomes associated with recurrence, isolated renal transplantation had been contraindicated in patients at high risk of aHUS recurrence. However, emerging therapies, including pre-emptive plasma therapy and anti-C5 component monoclonal antibody (eculizumab) treatment have provided promising results and should further limit indications for the risky procedure of combined liver-kidney transplantation. Studies from the past 2 years have demonstrated genetic abnormalities in complement regulators in 30% of renal transplant recipients who experienced de novo HUS after renal transplantation. This finding suggests that the burden of endothelial injury in a post-transplantation setting may trigger de novo HUS in the presence of mild genetic susceptibility to HUS.

No abstract

Poor responses to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine have been reported after 2 vaccine injections in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) treated with belatacept. We analyzed the humoral response in belatacept-treated KTRs without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection who received three injections of BNT162b2-mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. We also investigated vaccine immunogenicity in belatacept-treated KTRs with prior COVID-19 and characterized symptomatic COVID-19 infections after the vaccine in belatacept-treated KTRs.Among the 62 belatacept-treated KTRs (36 [58%] males), the median age ( 63.5 years IQR [51-72]), without COVID-19 history, only four patients (6.4%) developed anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG with low antibody titers (median 209, IQR [20-409] AU/ml). 71% were treated with mycophenolic acid and 100% with steroids in association with belatacept. In contrast, in all the 5 KTRs with prior COVID-19 history, mRNA vaccine induced a strong antibody response with high antibody titers (median 10 769 AU/ml, IQR [6410-20 069]) after two injections. Seroprevalence after three-vaccine doses in 35 non-belatacept-treated KTRs was 37.1%. Twelve KTRs developed symptomatic COVID-19 after vaccination, including severe forms (50% of mortality). Breakthrough COVID-19 occurred in 5% of fully vaccinated patients. Administration of a third dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine did not improve immunogenicity in KTRs treated with belatacept without prior COVID-19. Other strategies aiming to improve patient protection are needed. K E Y W O R D S belatacept, COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, kidney transplant recipients, three doses 1 | INTRODUC TI ON In contrast to immunocompetent individuals, poor immune responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccines have been observed in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) after two vaccine injections. Several studies demonstrated seroconversion rates between 30% and 54% in patients treated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)-based immunosuppressive therapy. 1-5

Since the recent publication of data showing favorable outcomes for patients with HIV-1 and ESRD, kidney transplantation has become a therapeutic option in this population. However, reports have documented unexplained reduced allograft survival in these patients. We hypothesized that the unrecognized infection of the transplanted kidney by HIV-1 can compromise long-term allograft function. Using electron microscopy and molecular biology, we examined protocol renal transplant biopsies from 19 recipients with HIV-1 who did not have detectable levels of plasma HIV-1 RNA at transplantation. We found that HIV-1 infected the kidney allograft in 68% of these patients. Notably, HIV-1 infection was detected in either podocytes predominately (38% of recipients) or tubular cells only (62% of recipients). Podocyte infection associated with podocyte apoptosis and loss of differentiation markers as well as a faster decline in allograft function compared with tubular cell infection. In allografts with tubular cell infection, epithelial cells of the proximal convoluted tubules frequently contained abnormal mitochondria, and both patients who developed features of subclinical acute cellular rejection had allografts with tubular cell infection. Finally, we provide a novel noninvasive test for determining HIV-1 infection of the kidney allograft by measuring HIV-1 DNA and RNA levels in patients' urine. In conclusion, HIV-1 can infect kidney allografts after transplantation despite undetectable viremia, and this infection might influence graft outcome.

Higher rates of severe COVID‐19 have been reported in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared to non‐transplant patients. We aimed to determine if poorer outcomes were specifically related to chronic immunosuppression or underlying comorbidities. We used a 1:1 propensity score‐matching method to compare survival and severe disease‐free survival (defined as death and/or need for intensive care unit (ICU)) incidence in hospitalized KTRs and non‐transplant control patients between 26 February and 22 May 2020. Patients were matched for risk factors of severe COVID‐19: age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, preexisting cardiopathy, chronic lung disease and basal renal function. We included 100 KTRs (median age [interquartile range (IQR)]) 64.7 years (55.3‐73.1) in 3 French transplant centers. After a median follow‐up of 13 days (7‐30), transfer to ICU was required for 34 patients (34%) and death occurred in 26 patients (26%). Overall, 43 patients (43%) developed a severe disease during a median follow‐up of 8.5 days (2‐14). Propensity score matching to a large French cohort of 2017 patients hospitalized in 24 centers, revealed that survival was similar between KTRs and matched non‐transplant patients with respective 30‐days survival of 62.9% and 71% (p=0.38) and severe disease‐free 30‐days survival of 50.6% and 47.5% (p=0.91). These findings suggest that severity of COVID‐19 in KTRs is related to their associated comorbidities and not to chronic immunosuppression.

Persistence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) associated with antibody-mediated graft injuries following kidney transplantation predicts evolution toward chronic humoral rejection and reduced graft survival. Targeting plasma cells, the main antibodyproducing cells, with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib may be a promising desensitization strategy. We evaluated the in vivo efficacy of one cycle of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m 2 × 4 doses), used as the sole desensitization therapy, in four renal transplant recipients experiencing subacute antibody-mediated rejection with persisting DSA (>2000 [Mean Fluorescence Intensity] MFI). Bortezomib treatment did not significantly decrease DSA MFI within the 150-day posttreatment period in any patient. In addition, antivirus (HBV, VZV and HSV) antibody levels remained stable following treatment suggesting a lack of efficacy on long-lived plasma cells. In conclusion, one cycle of bortezomib alone does not decrease DSA levels in sensitized kidney transplant recipients in the time period studied. These results underscore the need to evaluate this new desensitization agent properly in prospective, randomized and well-controlled studies.

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is one of the hallmark vascular lesions of antiphospholipid syndrome nephropathy (APSN). These lesions are at high risk of recurrence after kidney transplantation. The complement pathway is thought to be active in this process. We used eculizumab to treat three consecutive kidney transplant recipients with posttransplant TMA due to APSN recurrence that was resistant to plasmapheresis and explored the complement deposition and apoptotic and vascular cell markers on the sequential transplant biopsies. Treatment with eculizumab resulted in a rapid and dramatic improvement of the graft function in all three patients and in improvement of the TMA lesions within the graft. None of these patients had TMA flares after eculizumab was withdrawn. At the time of TMA diagnosis, immunofluorescence studies revealed intense C5b-9 and C4d depositions at the endothelial cell surface of the injured vessels. Moreover, C5b-9 colocalized with vessels exhibiting a high rate of apoptotic cells. Examination of sequential biopsies during eculizumab therapy showed that TMA lesions, C4d and apoptotic markers were rapidly cleared but the C5b-9 deposits persisted for several months as a footprint of the TMA. Finally, we noticed that complement inhibition did not prevent the development of the chronic vascular changes associated with APSN. Eculizumab seems to be an efficient method for treating severe forms of posttransplant TMA due to APSN recurrence. Terminal complement inhibition does not prevent the development of chronic APSN.