Ten data sources were used substantially to increase the available data for estimating fetal and livebirth sex ratios for Patau (trisomy 13), Edwards (trisomy 18), and Down (trisomy 21) syndromes and controls. The fetal sex ratio estimate was 0.88 (N = 584) for trisomy 13, 0.90 (N = 1702) for trisomy 18, and 1.16 (N = 3154) for trisomy 21. All were significantly different from prenatal controls (1.07). The estimated ratios in prenatal controls were 1.28 (N = 1409) for CVSs and 1.06 (N = 49427) for amniocenteses, indicating a clear differential selection against males, mostly during the first half of fetal development. By contrast, there were no sex ratio differences for any of the trisomies when comparing gestational ages <16 and >16 weeks. The livebirth sex ratio estimate was 0.90 (N = 293) for trisomy 13, 0.63 (N = 497) for trisomy 18, and 1.15 (N = 6424) for trisomy 21, the latter two being statistically different than controls (1.05) (N = 3660707). These ratios for trisomies 13 and 18 were also statistically different than the ratio for trisomy 21. Only in trisomy 18 did the sex ratios in fetuses and livebirths differ, indicating a prenatal selection against males >16 weeks. No effects of maternal age or race were found on these estimates for any of the fetal or livebirth trisomies. Sex ratios for translocations and mosaics were also estimated for these aneuploids. Compared to previous estimates, these results are less extreme, most likely because of larger sample sizes and less sample bias. They support the hypothesis that these trisomy sex ratios are skewed at conception, or become so during embryonic development through differential intrauterine selection. The estimate for Down syndrome livebirths is also consistent with the hypothesis that its higher sex ratio is associated with paternal nondisjunction. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Background: Bladder cancer (BC) treatment can have a detrimental effect on the sexual organs of patients and yet assessment of sexual health needs has been greatly overlooked for these patients compared to those who have undergone other cancer therapies. Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in July 2019. Studies were identified by conducting searches for Medline (using the PubMed interface), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Ovid Gateway (Embase and Ovid) using a list of defined search terms. Results: 15 out of 37 studies included men only, 10 studies women only and 11 both sexes. Most participants were aged 50 to 65 years. Most studies (n = 34) focused on muscle invasive BC and only three on non-muscle invasive BC. Measurements of sexual dysfunction, including erection, ejaculation, firmness and desire, were the most commonly used measurements to report sexual health in men. In women, lubrification/dryness, desire, orgasm and dyspareunia were the most commonly reported. Twenty-one studies evaluated sexual dysfunction based on validated questionnaires, two with a non-validated questionnaire and through interviewing participants. Conclusion: While recognition of the importance of the inclusion of psychometric measurements to assess sexual health is growing, there is a lack of consistent measures to assess sexual health in BC. With the focus on QoL arising in cancer survivorship, further studies are needed to develop, standardize and implement use of sexual health questionnaires with appropriate psychometrics and social measures to evaluate QoL in BC patients. Trial registration: "PROSPERO does not currently accept registrations for scoping reviews, literature reviews or mapping reviews. PROSPERO is therefore unable to accept your application or provide a registration number. This decision should not stop you from submitting your project for publication to a journal."
Basal PGE2 output by placental cells likely depends on the activity of PGHS1, not PGHS2. The effects of sulfasalazine suggest the importance of endogenous PGDH in regulating PGE2 output, and interactions with sulfasalazine, dexamethasone, and meloxicam suggest that glucocorticoid-stimulated output of PGE2 by placental cells may be attributable to both up-regulation of PGHS and down-regulation of PGDH.
Recent evidence suggests that ovine placental output of prostaglandin (PG) E2 rises through late gestation partly because of a direct effect of cortisol on PGH2 synthase 2 (PGHS-2) expression and activity within trophoblast tissue. Synthesis of PGE2 is also dependent, however, on PGE2 synthase (PGES), which converts PGH2 to PGE2. We hypothesized that PGES is expressed in the ovine placenta, and that, similar to PGHS-2, expression increases through gestation and is regulated positively by cortisol. Placental tissues from pregnant ewes in mid and late gestation, at term, and during early and active labor were analyzed to determine the gestational profile of PGES. The regulation of PGES expression was assessed in placental tissues from pregnant ewes in which intrafetal cortisol infusion was administered in late gestation, in the presence or absence of an aromatase inhibitor, to block the cortisol-stimulated rise in estradiol. Expression of PGES was analyzed by in situ hybridization, Western blot analysis, and immunohistochemistry. In the placentome, PGES localized to fetal trophoblast cells and endothelial cells in maternal blood vessels, consistent with its contribution to the rise in placental PGE2 output toward the onset of labor and with a role of PGE2 in the local regulation of uteroplacental blood flow, respectively. Expression of PGES mRNA and protein increased with gestation. However, there was no significant further change with labor or during cortisol infusion in the presence or absence of a rise in fetal plasma estradiol, in contrast to reported changes in PGHS-2. These results suggest that PGES is not coregulated with PGHS-2 in the sheep placenta at term. The progressive increase in PGES, however, likely contributes to the rise in circulating PGE2 in the fetus in late pregnancy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.