Abstract. Snow water equivalent (SWE) measurements of seasonal snowpack are crucial in many research fields. Yet accurate measurements at a high temporal resolution are difficult to obtain in high mountain regions. With a cosmic ray sensor (CRS), SWE can be inferred from neutron counts. We present the analyses of temporally continuous SWE measurements by a CRS on an alpine glacier in Switzerland (Glacier de la Plaine Morte) over two winter seasons (2016/17 and 2017/18), which differed markedly in the amount and timing of snow accumulation. By combining SWE with snow depth measurements, we calculate the daily mean density of the snowpack. Compared to manual field observations from snow pits, the autonomous measurements overestimate SWE by +2 % ± 13 %. Snow depth and the bulk snow density deviate from the manual measurements by ±6 % and ±9 %, respectively. The CRS measured with high reliability over two winter seasons and is thus considered a promising method to observe SWE at remote alpine sites. We use the daily observations to classify winter season days into those dominated by accumulation (solid precipitation, snow drift), ablation (snow drift, snowmelt) or snow densification. For each of these process-dominated days the prevailing meteorological conditions are distinct. The continuous SWE measurements were also used to define a scaling factor for precipitation amounts from nearby meteorological stations. With this analysis, we show that a best-possible constant scaling factor results in cumulative precipitation amounts that differ by a mean absolute error of less than 80 mm w.e. from snow accumulation at this site.
The snowwater equivalent (SWE) is a key component for understanding changes in the cryosphere in high mountain regions. Yet, a reliable quantification at a high spatio-temporal resolution remains challenging in such environments. In this study, we investigate the potential of an operational weather radar - rain gauge composite (CombiPrecip) to infer the daily evolution of SWE on seven Swiss glaciers. To this end, we validate cumulative CombiPrecip estimates with glacier-wide manual SWE observations (snow probing, snow pits) obtained around the time of the seasonal peak during four winter seasons (2015-2019). CombiPrecip underestimates the end-of-season snow accumulation by factors of 2.2 up to 3.7, depending on the glacier site. However, these factors are consistent over the four winter seasons. The regional variability can be mainly attributed to the empirical visibility of the Swiss radar network within the Alps. To account for the underestimation, we investigate three approaches to adjust CombiPrecip for the applicability to glacier sites. Thereby, we combine the factor of underestimation with a precipitation-phase parameterization. For further comparison, we apply a rain gauge catch-efficiency function based on wind speed. We validate these approaches with 14 manual point observations of SWE obtained on two glaciers during three winter seasons. All approaches show a similar improvement of CombiPrecip estimates. We conclude that CombiPrecip has great potential to estimate SWE on glaciers at a high temporal resolution, but further investigations are necessary to understand the regional variability of the bias throughout the Swiss Alps.
Abstract. Snow water equivalent (SWE) measurements are crucial in many research fields. Yet accurate measurements at a high temporal resolution are difficult to obtain in high mountain regions. With a cosmic ray sensor (CRS), SWE can be directly derived from neutron counts. In this study, we present the analyses of temporally continuous SWE measurements by a CRS on a Swiss glacier (Glacier de la Plaine Morte) over two winter seasons (2016/17 and 2017/18), which were markedly different in terms of amount and timing of snow accumulation. By combining the SWE values with snow depth measurements, we calculate the daily mean density of the snowpack. The autonomous measurements overestimate SWE by +2 % ± 12 % compared to manual field observations (snow pits). Snow depth and mean density agree with manual in situ measurements with a standard deviation of ±6 % and ±8 %, respectively. In general, the cosmic ray sensor measured with high reliability during these two winter seasons and is, thus, considered an effective method to measure SWE at remote high alpine sites. We use the daily observations to break down the winter season into days either dominated by accumulation (solid precipitation, snow drift), ablation (snow drift, melt) or snow densification. The prevailing meteorological conditions of these periods are clearly distinct for each of the classified processes. Moreover, we compare daily SWE amounts to precipitation sums from three nearby weather stations located at lower elevations, and to a gridded precipitation dataset. We determine the best-possible scaling factor for these precipitation estimates in order to reproduce the measured accumulation on the glacier. Using only one scaling factor for the whole time series, we find a mean absolute error of less than 8 cm w.e. for the reproduced snow accumulation. By applying temperature-specific scaling factors, this mean absolute error can be reduced to less than 6 cm w.e. for all stations.
Abstract. Monitoring the snow water equivalent (SWE) in the harsh environments of high mountain regions is a challenge. Here, we explore the use of muon counts to infer SWE. We deployed a muonic cosmic ray snow gauge (μ-CRSG) on a Swiss glacier during the snow-rich winter season 2020/21 (almost 2000 mm w.e.). The μ-CRSG measurements agree well with measurements by a neutronic cosmic ray snow gauge (n-CRSG), and they lie within the uncertainty of manual observations. We conclude that the μ-CRSG is a highly promising method to monitor SWE in remote high mountain environments with several advantages over the n-CRSG.
Snow and precipitation estimates in high-mountain regions typically suffer from low temporal and spatial resolution and large uncertainties. Here, we present a two-step statistically based model to derive spatio-temporal highly resolved estimates of snow water equivalent (SWE) across the Swiss Alps. A multiple linear regression model (Step-1 MLR) was first used to combine the CombiPrecip radar-gauge product with the precipitation and wind speed (10 m from the ground) of the numerical weather prediction model COSMO-1 in order to adjust the precipitation estimates. Step-1 MLR was trained with SWE data from a cosmic ray sensor (CRS) installed on the Plaine Morte glacier and tested with SWE data from a CRS on the Findel glacier. Step-1 MLR was then applied to the entire area of eight Swiss glaciers and evaluated with scattered end-of-season in-situ manual SWE measurements. The cumulative estimates of Step-1 MLR were found to agree well with the end-of-season measurements. The observed differences can partially be explained by considering the radar visibility, melting processes and preferential snow deposition, which are dictated by the local topography and local weather conditions. To address these limitations of Step-1 MLR, several high-resolution topographical parameters and a solar radiation parameter were included in the subsequent MLR version (Step-2 MLR). Step-2 MLR was evaluated by means of cross-validation, and it showed an overall correlation of 0.78 and a mean bias error of 4 mm with respect to end-of-season in-situ measurements. Step-2 MLR was also evaluated for non-glacierized regions by evaluating it against twice-monthly manual SWE measurements at 44 sites in the Swiss Alps. In such a setting, the Step-2 model showed an overall weaker correlation (0.53) and a higher mean bias error (31 mm). On the other hand, negative variations of the measured SWE were removed because of the lower altitude of the sites, thereby leading to more pronounced melting periods, which again increased the correlation values to 0.63 and reduced the mean bias error to 12 mm. Such results confirm the high potential of the model for applications to other mountainous regions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.