The polyamines norspermidine and spermidine are among the environmental signals that regulate Vibrio cholerae biofilm formation. The effects of these polyamines are mediated by NspS, a member of the bacterial periplasmic solute binding protein superfamily. Almost all members of this superfamily characterized to date are components of ATP-binding cassette-type transporters involved in nutrient uptake. Consequently, in the current annotation of the V. cholerae genome, NspS has been assigned a function in transport. The objective of this study was to further characterize NspS and investigate its potential role in transport. Our results support a role for NspS in signal transduction in response to norspermidine and spermidine, but not their transport. In addition, we provide evidence that these polyamine signals are processed by c-di-GMP signalling networks in the cell. Furthermore, we present comparative genomics analyses which reveal the presence of NspS-like proteins in a variety of bacteria, suggesting that periplasmic ligand binding proteins may be widely utilized for sensory transduction.

Initiation of protein synthesis in eukaryotes requires recruitment of the ribosome to the mRNA and its translocation to the start codon. There are at least two distinct mechanisms by which this process can be achieved; the ribosome can be recruited either to the cap structure at the 5 end of the message or to an internal ribosome entry segment (IRES), a complex RNA structural element located in the 5 untranslated region (5-UTR) of the mRNA. However, it is not well understood how cellular IRESs function to recruit the ribosome or how the 40S ribosomal subunits translocate from the initial recruitment site on the mRNA to the AUG initiation codon. We have investigated the canonical factors that are required by the IRESs found in the 5-UTRs of c-, L-, and N-myc, using specific inhibitors and a tissue culture-based assay system, and have shown that they differ considerably in their requirements. The L-myc IRES requires the eIF4F complex and the association of PABP and eIF3 with eIF4G for activity. The minimum requirements of the N-and c-myc IRESs are the C-terminal domain of eIF4G to which eIF4A is bound and eIF3, although interestingly this protein does not appear to be recruited to the IRES RNA via eIF4G. Finally, our data show that all three IRESs require a ternary complex, although in contrast to c-and L-myc IRESs, the N-myc IRES has a lesser requirement for a ternary complex.The proteins encoded by the Myc family of genes are basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper proteins that function as transcription factors and interact with another basic helix-loophelix leucine zipper protein known as Max (3). Myc-Max heterodimers bind to DNA sequences called E boxes (CANNTG) and thereby facilitate activation of gene expression (3). All members of this family of genes contain three exons and two introns, and the main initiation codon is located toward the 5Ј end of exon 2 such that exon 1 forms the majority of the 5Ј untranslated region. We and others have shown previously that members of the Myc gene family contain a complex RNA structural element within exon 1 termed an internal ribosome entry segment (IRES), which allows the mRNAs to be translated by cap-independent internal ribosome entry (17,18,31,43). IRESs were first identified in picornaviruses (2), but it has been shown that many cellular mRNAs also use these elements to initiate translation (39). Indeed, microarray studies have suggested that up to 10% of all cellular mRNAs contain IRESs (6,15,35,39). In general, cellular IRESs are used during situations when the cap-dependent scanning mechanism of translation initiation is compromised (39).The majority of viral IRESs require both canonical initiation factors (eukaryotic initiation factors [eIFs]) (eIF4F is comprised of eIF4G [the scaffold protein], eIF4E [the cap binding protein], and eIF4A [a DEAD box helicase]; eIF3, which also binds to eIF4G, is required for ribosome recruitment) and specific trans-acting factors for function, although each IRES has distinct requirements. For example, hepatitis A virus IRES fun...

No abstract

Marine and lake snow is a continuous shower of mixed organic and inorganic aggregates falling from the upper water where primary production is substantial. These pelagic aggregates provide a niche for microbes that can exploit these physical structures and resources for growth, thus are local hot spots for microbial activity. However, processes underlying their formation remain unknown. Here, we investigated the role of chemical signaling between two co-occurring bacteria that each make up more than 10% of the community in iron-rich lakes aggregates (iron snow). The filamentous iron-oxidizing Acidithrix strain showed increased rates of Fe(II) oxidation when incubated with cell-free supernatant of the heterotrophic iron-reducing Acidiphilium strain. Amendment of Acidithrix supernatant to motile cells of Acidiphilium triggered formation of cell aggregates displaying similar morphology to those of iron snow. Comparative metabolomics enabled the identification of the aggregation-inducing signal, 2-phenethylamine, which also induced faster growth of Acidiphilium. We propose a model that shows rapid iron snow formation, and ultimately energy transfer from the photic zone to deeper water layers, is controlled via a chemically mediated interplay.

Abstract. The formation of Fe(III) oxides in natural environments occurs in the presence of natural organic matter (OM), resulting in the formation of OM-mineral complexes that form through adsorption or coprecipitation processes. Thus, microbial Fe(III) reduction in natural environments most often occurs in the presence of OM-mineral complexes rather than pure Fe(III) minerals. This study investigated to what extent does the content of adsorbed or coprecipitated OM on ferrihydrite influence the rate of Fe(III) reduction by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, a model Fe(III)-reducing microorganism, in comparison to a microbial consortium extracted from the acidic, Fe-rich Schlöppnerbrunnen fen. We found that increased OM content led to increased rates of microbial Fe(III) reduction by S. oneidensis MR-1 in contrast to earlier findings with the model organism Geobacter bremensis. Ferrihydrite-OM coprecipitates were reduced slightly faster than ferrihydrites with adsorbed OM. Surprisingly, the complex microbial consortia stimulated by a mixture of electrons donors (lactate, acetate, and glucose) mimics S. oneidensis under the same experimental Fe(III)-reducing conditions suggesting similar mechanisms of electron transfer whether or not the OM is adsorbed or coprecipitated to the mineral surfaces. We also followed potential shifts of the microbial community during the incubation via 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses to determine variations due to the presence of adsorbed or coprecipitated OM-ferrihydrite complexes in contrast to pure ferrihydrite. Community profile analyses showed no enrichment of typical model Fe(III)-reducing bacteria, such as Shewanella or Geobacter sp., but an enrichment of fermenters (e.g., Enterobacteria) during pure ferrihydrite incubations which are known to use Fe(III) as an electron sink. Instead, OM-mineral complexes favored the enrichment of microbes including Desulfobacteria and Pelosinus sp., both of which can utilize lactate and acetate as an electron donor under Fe(III)-reducing conditions. In summary, this study shows that increasing concentrations of OM in OM-mineral complexes determines microbial Fe(III) reduction rates and shapes the microbial community structure involved in the reductive dissolution of ferrihydrite. Similarities observed between the complex Fe(III)-reducing microbial consortia and the model Fe(III)-reducer S. oneidensis MR-1 suggest electron-shuttling mechanisms dominate in OM-rich environments, including soils, sediments, and fens, where natural OM interacts with Fe(III) oxides during mineral formation.

No abstract

Coexistence of microaerophilic Fe(II)-oxidizers and anaerobic Fe(III)-reducers in environments with fluctuating redox conditions is a prime example of mutualism, in which both partners benefit from the sustained Fe-pool. Consequently, the Fe-cycling machineries (i.e., metal-reducing or –oxidizing pathways) should be most affected during co-cultivation. However, contrasting growth requirements impeded systematic elucidation of their interactions. To disentangle underlying interaction mechanisms, we established a suboxic co-culture system of Sideroxydans sp. CL21 and Shewanella oneidensis. We showed that addition of the partner’s cell-free supernatant enhanced both growth and Fe(II)-oxidizing or Fe(III)-reducing activity of each partner. Metabolites of the exometabolome of Sideroxydans sp. CL21 are generally upregulated if stimulated with the partner´s spent medium, while S. oneidensis exhibits a mixed metabolic response in accordance with a balanced response to the partner. Surprisingly, RNA-seq analysis revealed genes involved in Fe-cycling were not differentially expressed during co-cultivation. Instead, the most differentially upregulated genes included those encoding for biopolymer production, lipoprotein transport, putrescine biosynthesis, and amino acid degradation suggesting a regulated inter-species biofilm formation. Furthermore, the upregulation of hydrogenases in Sideroxydans sp. CL21 points to competition for H2 as electron donor. Our findings reveal that a complex metabolic and transcriptomic response, but not accelerated formation of Fe-end products, drive interactions of Fe-cycling microorganisms.

The tritium exchange technique has been used to detemine the maximum number of surface protons at the oxide-water interface for oxide colloids including silicas, TiO2 (rutile) and the iron oxides goethite, hematite and amorphous iron oxide. The effects of heat treatment, crystal structure and exchange conditions are considered and tritium exchange values for the number of surface protons are compared with values calculated from crystal structures.