Background Individuals who contract coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can suffer with persistent and debilitating symptoms long after the initial acute illness. Heart rate (HR) profiles determined during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and delivered as part of a post-COVID recovery service may provide an insight into presence and impact of dysautonomia on functional ability. Objective Using an active, working age, post-COVID-19 population, the aim was to: 1) understand and characterise any association between subjective symptoms and dysautonomia, and 2) identify objective exercise capacity differences between patients classified ‘with’ and ‘without’ dysautonomia. Methods Patients referred to a post-COVID-19 service underwent comprehensive clinical assessment, including self-reported symptoms, CPET and secondary care investigations when indicated. Resting HR >75 beats per minute (bpm), HR increase with exercise <89bpm, and HR recovery <25bpm one minute after exercise were used to define dysautonomia. Anonymised data were analysed and associations with symptoms and CPET outcomes determined. Results Fifty-one (25%) of the 205 patients reviewed as part of this service evaluation had dysautonomia. There were no associations between symptoms or perceived functional limitation and dysautonomia (p>0.05). Patients with dysautonomia demonstrated objective functional limitations with significantly reduced work rate (219±37 W vs. 253±52 W, p<0.001), peak oxygen consumption (V̇O 2 : 30.6±5.5 ml/kg/min vs. 35.8±7.6 ml/kg/min, p<0.001) and a steeper (less efficient) V̇E/V̇CO 2 slope (29.9±4.9 vs. 27.7±4.7, p=0.005). Conclusion Dysautonomia is associated with objective functional limitations but is not associated with subjective symptoms or limitation.

Introduction There have been more than 425 million COVID-19 infections worldwide. Post-COVID illness has become a common, disabling complication of this infection. Therefore, it presents a significant challenge to global public health and economic activity. Methods Comprehensive clinical assessment (symptoms, WHO performance status, cognitive testing, CPET, lung function, high-resolution CT chest, CT pulmonary angiogram and cardiac MRI) of previously well, working-age adults in full-time employment was conducted to identify physical and neurocognitive deficits in those with severe or prolonged COVID-19 illness. Results 205 consecutive patients, age 39 (IQR30.0–46.7) years, 84% male, were assessed 24 (IQR17.1–34.0) weeks after acute illness. 69% reported ≥3 ongoing symptoms. Shortness of breath (61%), fatigue (54%) and cognitive problems (47%) were the most frequent symptoms, 17% met criteria for anxiety and 24% depression. 67% remained below pre-COVID performance status at 24 weeks. One third of lung function tests were abnormal, (reduced lung volume and transfer factor, and obstructive spirometry). HRCT lung was clinically indicated in <50% of patients, with COVID-associated pathology found in 25% of these. In all but three HRCTs, changes were graded ‘mild’. There was an extremely low incidence of pulmonary thromboembolic disease or significant cardiac pathology. A specific, focal cognitive deficit was identified in those with ongoing symptoms of fatigue, poor concentration, poor memory, low mood, and anxiety. This was notably more common in patients managed in the community during their acute illness. Conclusion Despite low rates of residual cardiopulmonary pathology, in this cohort, with low rates of premorbid illness, there is a high burden of symptoms and failure to regain pre-COVID performance 6-months after acute illness. Cognitive assessment identified a specific deficit of the same magnitude as intoxication at the UK drink driving limit or the deterioration expected with 10 years ageing, which appears to contribute significantly to the symptomatology of long-COVID.

Background: A failure to fully recover following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may have a profound impact on high functioning populations ranging from front-line emergency services to professional or amateur/recreational athletes. Aim: To describe the medium-term cardiopulmonary exercise profiles of individuals with 'persistent symptoms' and individuals who feel 'recovered' after hospitalization or mild-moderate community infection following COVID-19 to an age, sex and job-role matched control group. Methods: 113 participants underwent cardiopulmonary functional tests at a mean 159±7 days (~5 months) following acute illness; 27 hospitalized with persistent symptoms (hospitalized-symptomatic), 8 hospitalized and now recovered (hospitalized-recovered); 34 community managed with persistent symptoms (community-symptomatic); 18 community managed and now recovered (community-recovered), and 26 controls. Results: Hospitalized groups had the least favorable body composition (body mass, body mass index and waist circumference) compared to controls. Hospitalized-symptomatic and community-symptomatic individuals had a lower oxygen uptake (V̇O2) at peak exercise (hospitalized-symptomatic, 29.9±5.0ml/kg/min; community-symptomatic, 34.4±7.2ml/kg/min; vs. control 43.9±3.1ml/kg/min, both p<0.001). Hospitalized-symptomatic individuals had a steeper V̇E/V̇CO2 slope (lower ventilatory efficiency) (30.5±5.3 vs. 25.5±2.6, p=0.003) vs. controls. Hospitalized-recovered had a significantly lower oxygen uptake at peak (32.6±6.6ml/kg/min vs. 43.9 ±13.1ml/kg/min, p=0.015) compared to controls. No significant differences were reported between community-recovered individuals and controls in any cardiopulmonary parameter. Conclusion: Medium term findings suggest community-recovered individuals did not differ in cardiopulmonary fitness from physically active healthy controls. This suggests their readiness to return to higher levels of physical activity. However, the hospitalized-recovered group and both groups with persistent symptoms had enduring functional limitations, warranting further monitoring, rehabilitation and recovery.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes significant mortality and morbidity, with an unknown impact in the medium to long term. Evidence from previous coronavirus epidemics indicates that there is likely to be a substantial burden of disease, potentially even in those with a mild acute illness. The clinical and occupational effects of COVID-19 are likely to impact on the operational effectiveness of the Armed Forces. Collaboration between Defence Primary Healthcare, Defence Secondary Healthcare, Defence Rehabilitation and Defence Occupational Medicine resulted in the Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre COVID-19 Recovery Service (DCRS). This integrated clinical and occupational pathway uses cardiopulmonary assessment as a cornerstone to identify, diagnose and manage post-COVID-19 pathology.