No abstract

No abstract

The CEFA is suitable for use with people with mild to moderate learning disabilities, whereas the BADS-C is at the lower limit of usability with this client group. The lower-than-expected scores observed on the BADS-C may indicate that people known to learning disability services may be more impaired than people of comparable IQ not known to services. The structure of EF seen in people with IDs closely resembles a model of EF in the general population that has received a broad level of support.

No abstract

No abstract

The subjective value of rewards declines as a function of the delay to receive them (temporal discounting). Three temporal discounting tasks that assessed preferences between small amounts of money (10 pence) over short delays (60 s), moderate amounts of money (10 pound) over moderate delays (2 weeks), and large amounts of money (1000 pound) over long delays (12 months) were presented to people with intellectual disabilities (Full-Scale IQ < 70) and to a comparison group (ns = 20 for each group). Measures of IQ, financial knowledge, memory, and executive functioning were also obtained. Only a third of the service users were able to perform the temporal discounting tasks consistently, and they tended to respond impulsively. The proportion of participants responding consistently increased following training. Both the initial performance and the effect of training were related to executive functioning but not IQ.

Health workers’ knowledge of contraceptive side effects increased substantially. The mobile phone approach was convenient and flexible and did not disrupt routine service delivery. Clear limitations of the medium are participants can’t practice clinical skills or have interactive discussions. Also, some participants had trouble with network reception.

The results suggest that difficulty in 'weighing up' information may be a general problem for people with ID, pointing to a need for psycho-educational remediation strategies to address this issue. The importance of executive functioning in decision-making by people with ID is not recognized in the legal test for mental capacity, which in practice includes a possibly irrelevant IQ criterion.