Causes of Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancers Based on WorldEndoscopy Organization System of Analysis BACKGROUND & AIMS: Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) is CRC diagnosed after a colonoscopy in which no cancer was found. A consensus article from the World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) proposed an approach for investigating and categorizing PCCRCs detected within 4 years of a colonoscopy. We aimed to identify cases of PCCRC and the factors that cause them, test the WEO system of categorization, quantify the proportion of avoidable PCCRCs, and propose a target rate for PCCRCs detected within 3 years of a colonoscopy that did not detect CRC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 107 PCCRCs identified at a single medical center in England from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2017 using coding and endoscopy data. For each case, we reviewed clinical, pathology, radiology, and endoscopy findings. Using the WEO recommendations, we performed a root-cause analysis of each case, categorizing lesions as follows: possible missed lesion, prior examination adequate; possible missed lesion, prior examination inadequate; detected lesion, not resected; or likely incomplete resection of previously identified lesion. We determined whether PCCRCs could be attributed to the colonoscopist for technical or decision-making reasons, and whether the PCCRC was avoidable or unavoidable, based on the WEO categorization and size of tumor. The endoscopy reporting system provided performance data for individual endoscopists. RESULTS: Of the PCCRCs identified, 43% were in high-risk patients (those with

No abstract

Objectives As hospitals are increasingly consolidating into larger health systems, they are becoming better positioned to have far reaching and material impacts on safety and quality of care. When the Mount Sinai Health System (MSHS) was formed in 2013, it sought to ensure the delivery of safe, high-quality care to every patient. In 2014, the MSHS addressed hand hygiene as the first major system-wide process improvement project focused on quality and safety. The goals of this study were to evaluate a system-wide hand hygiene program and to create a foundation for future process improvement projects. Methods The MSHS implemented the Joint Commission’s Targeted Solutions Tool as a way to improve hand hygiene compliance and reduce harm from hospital-acquired infections, specifically Clostridium difficile infections. A multifaceted approach was used to improve hand hygiene and promote a culture of patient safety. Results The MSHS improved hand hygiene compliance by approximately 20% from a baseline compliance of 63.3% to an intervention compliance of 82.8% (P < 0.001). Additional correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between increasing hand hygiene compliance and reduction in C. difficile infections. Conclusions Through a focus on leadership engagement, data transparency, data and observer management, and system-wide communication of best practices, the MSHS was able to improve hand hygiene compliance, reduce infection rates, and build an effective foundation for future process improvement programs.

No abstract

No abstract