Estimates of above ground biomass density in forests are crucial for refining global climate models and understanding climate change. Although data from field studies can be aggregated to estimate carbon stocks on global scales, the sparsity of such field data, temporal heterogeneity and methodological variations introduce large errors. Remote sensing measurements from spaceborne sensors are a realistic alternative for global carbon accounting; however, the uncertainty of such measurements is not well known and remains an active area of research. This article describes an effort to collect field data at the Harvard and Howland Forest sites, set in the temperate forests of the Northeastern United States in an attempt to establish ground truth forest biomass for calibration of remote sensing measurements. We present an assessment of the quality of ground truth biomass estimates derived from three different sets of diameter-based allometric equations over the Harvard and Howland Forests to establish the contribution of errors in ground truth data to the error in biomass estimates from remote sensing measurements.

No abstract

No abstract

Estimating the amount of above ground biomass in forested areas and the measurement of carbon flux through the quantification of disturbance and regrowth are critical to develop a better understanding of ecosystem processes. Well-resolved and globally consistent inventories of forest carbon must rely on remote sensing measurements, particularly from polarimetric radars. While a wide variety of studies conducted over the past three decades have shown how radar polarimetric measurements can be used to estimate above ground carbon for regions with less than 100 Mg of biomass per hectare, there is no established methodology for assessing biomass estimation accuracy based on a priori instrument and mission parameters. In this paper, a framework for assessing biomass estimation accuracy is presented that is a blend of the basic imaging physics and empirically derived parameters that describe various relationships between biomass and radar polarimetric observable quantities. The implications of this error model on the design and performance of a polarimetric radar are explored using instrument, mission, and science parameters from a notional Earth observing mission.

No abstract