Background:In the emergency department (ED), pain is the most common complaint, especially among trauma patients. However, two-thirds of trauma patients are discharged from EDs with moderate to severe pain. Therefore, pain management is an important part of care in ED's trauma patients. Aim:To assess the effectiveness of pain management among trauma patients in the ED. Method:A retrospective cohort study that was conducted on adult trauma patients who attended the ED at King Abdulaziz medical city (KAMC) in Jeddah from the period (June 2016 to July 2018). The pain was measured twice, one before the intervention and one after intervention using a numeric pain scale. Data were collected from health information system (Best care®) and analyzed using SPSS version 24. Results:The Mean difference between pain scores before and after pain management was one on a numeric pain scale with a P-Value 0.001. Initial pain assessment occurred only in 69% of our population, while assessment after intervention happened in 71% of patients. Patients who received appropriate medication were 36.7%. 35% of patients received opioids as an initial drug of pain management; only 8.8% of patients had pain scores more than 7 initially. The median between the time of arrival and the time of Initial Assessment is 19 mins. Conclusion:Pain management in ED needs improvement. Timeliness of pain management should be addressed.Evaluation and re-evaluation of pain before and after the intervention is insu cient. Trauma Patients don't receive effective pain management in the ED.
Background:In the emergency department (ED), pain is the most common complaint, especially among trauma patients. However, two-thirds of trauma patients are discharged from EDs with moderate to severe pain. Therefore, pain management is an important part of care in ED's trauma patients.Aim:To assess the effectiveness of pain management among trauma patients in the ED.Method:A retrospective cohort study that was conducted on adult trauma patients who attended the ED at King Abdulaziz medical city (KAMC) in Jeddah from the period (June 2016 to July 2018). The pain was measured twice, one before the intervention and one after intervention using a numeric pain scale. Data were collected from health information system (Best care®) and analyzed using SPSS version 24.Results:The Mean difference between pain scores before and after pain management was one on a numeric pain scale with a P-Value 0.001. Initial pain assessment occurred only in 69% of our population, while assessment after intervention happened in 71% of patients. Patients who received appropriate medication were 36.7%. 35% of patients received opioids as an initial drug of pain management; only 8.8% of patients had pain scores more than 7 initially. The median between the time of arrival and the time of Initial Assessment is 19 mins.Conclusion:Pain management in ED needs improvement. Timeliness of pain management should be addressed. Evaluation and re-evaluation of pain before and after the intervention is insufficient. Trauma Patients don't receive effective pain management in the ED.
graphical representation of key performance indicator (KPI) trends, and the dashboard with color-coded visual indicators are also important features. Conclusion A well designed e-OVR system has a significant positive impact on the effectiveness and efficiency of any healthcare risk management system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.