Radical perineal prostatectomy is comparable to radical retropubic prostatectomy for obtaining adequate surgical margins, avoiding inadvertent capsular incisions and excising adequate extracapsular tissue around tumor foci. Additional patient accrual and prostate specific antigen followup would further help validate the similar efficacy of the 2 surgical approaches as treatment for prostate cancer.
Radical perineal prostatectomy is comparable to radical retropubic prostatectomy for obtaining adequate surgical margins, avoiding inadvertent capsular incisions and excising adequate extracapsular tissue around tumor foci. Additional patient accrual and prostate specific antigen followup would further help validate the similar efficacy of the 2 surgical approaches as treatment for prostate cancer.
To determine if a relationship exists between patient body habitus and urinary incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for clinically localized prostate cancer. A questionnaire developed by combining parts of lower urinary tract symptom questionnaires concerning voiding symptoms after RRP was mailed to 268 consecutive patients who underwent RRP over a 2-year period. The interval between surgery and questionnaire administration was greater than 24 months for each patient. No interval was greater than 54 months. The questionnaire attempted to overcome the subjectivity of patient documented urinary incontinence by probing different aspects of each patient's voiding symptoms. Body mass index (BMI), obtained from preoperative anesthesia records, was used as the measurement for body habitus. Pearson correlations were used to determine relationships between BMI and responses and the independent t-test was used to determine differences between grouped responses and BMI. One hundred and eighty-two of 268 (68%) questionnaires were returned. No relationship was detected between BMI and patient estimates of urinary control, QOL relating to urinary symptoms, severity of stress incontinence, or use of protection (pad use). As well, no statistically significant relationship was found between BMI and a patient's willingness to undergo RRP again, based on his voiding symptoms, if given the choice. In conclusion, although patient body habitus may be related to other clinical outcomes following RRP, there does not appear to be a relationship of BMI to post-RRP urinary incontinence.
Purpose: To assess fecal incontinence rates and bowel function for radical perineal (RPP) or radical retropubic (RRP) prostatectomy patients and to compare them with a matched control group. Methods: The bowel function domain of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) was mailed to 150 consecutive patients who had undergone RPP (79) or RRP (71) by the same surgeon (HJK) and an age-matched control group (75). Results: Fecal incontinence and bowel dysfunction were statistically equivalent for the study groups. Conclusions: There is no difference in fecal incontinence rates or bowel function when comparing RPP patients to RRP or control patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.