The role of knowledge of the reversibility of reversible figures was tested in four experiments. Two ambiguous figures, the vase-face figure and a depth-reversing pyramid-hallway figure were shown to high school students. In the Uninformed condition, subjects were not told that the figures were reversible. A sampling procedure was used in which subjects reported what they perceived at 5-sec intervals. Viewing durations of up to 3 min were used, and approximately half of all subjects did not reverse at all during the Uninformed condition, whereas virtually all subjects reversed quickly and frequently once they knew that the figures were reversible. These results are not consistent with neural fatigue models of perceptual reversal.Ambiguous figures and the perceptual alternations which occur when viewing them are of interest because their explanation would appear to require central dynamic factors. Previous reports and theories have repeatedly stressed the spontaneous character of the reversals in which voluntary control neither causes nor prevents reversal. This apparent spontaneity of reversals has played an important role in the theoretical interpretation of the phenomena. The most widely investigated theory, the cortical satiation theory of Kohler and Wallach (1944), proposed that cortical' events produce their own resistance and bring about their automatic replacement by the opposing cortical events that then result in the perceptual reorganization. But all fatigue or satiation theories of reversal, including those based on contemporary neurophysiological constructs, posit an inexorable effect due to continuous passive stiniulation.This kind of theory of reversal implicitly defines ambiguity purely in stimulus terms. The stimulus can represent two (or more) possible objects, and when one such percept is satiated another automatically replaces it. Of course, this presupposes that the observer can identify these alternatives either because each is a familiar object (e.g., "cube," "face," "vase," etc.) or because each is a member of a different category or distinctive in some way in the observer's repertoire (e.g., "cube tipped up or on edge," "two-dimensional line pattern," etc.) But one might ask the further question of whether the meaning of ambiguity presupposes awareness by the observer that the figure is ambiguous. This is the issue with which we are concerned here. There is nothing in the literature to suggest that such awareness is part of 'the meaning of ambiguity and, in fact, it seems to be implicit that such knowledge is not a necessary part of the meaning. Certainly such an assumption is alien to the satiation model for the reasons 550 suggested above.Nonetheless, experiments on figure reversal are performed with informed subjects. The method typically employed in studying this problem seems necessarily to entail informing the subject about the possible alternative perceptions of a given figure, and that the figure reverses. It is understandable why investigators have believed that only in this way ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.