Placement of the multilateral junction is one of the most critical elements in the design of a multilateral well. A misplaced or mal-performing junction can have an adverse effect on an otherwise successful multilateral project. The optimum placement of the junction is a function of reservoir, geological, drilling, and completion criteria. The list may include such criteria as reservoir development strategy, pressures & heterogeneity, geological structure, lithology, wellbore stability, multilateral junction integrity, directional drilling requirements, logging requirements, artificial lift design, and completion type. These combined factors have a direct economic impact on the success and viability of the project. This paper describes a process whereby the proper junction selection criteria can be evaluated in light of pertinent technical and economic criteria and examines lessons learned from case histories with junction problems. Introduction A screening analysis is generally performed prior to having all of the data, offset information, and production information. Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to provide some Rules of Thumb meant primarily to narrow the focus area. Several assumptions are made in the generation of these Rules of Thumb:The beds are assumed to be laminar and horizontal for the base caseDogleg Severity (DLS) is a function of build rate and turn rate. In this paper, the 2D trajectory, where the DLS turn rate component is zero, is considered the base case.Correlations with respect to DLS and equipment capabilities are given with the assumption that the casing exit is from the vertical well.Directional tools, crossflow, formation damage, stimulation, and cleanup are design factors in all multilateral levels. However, discussion of optimal junction placement is primarily focused on TAML Levels 3–6. Levels 1 and 2 have junctions that are typically installed in the same horizontal plane in carbonates or very consolidated sands, where placement is not dependent on a correlation between the type of multilateral system and wellbore geometry. Conventional Well Design Criteria Many of the aspects that are discussed in this paper are not unique to multilateral wells. A cost/benefit analysis will always be performed prior to undertaking any oil field operation; therefore, many of the parameters mentioned are not pertinent just to multilateral well design alone. Issues such as placement of the wellbore in the reservoir, reservoir exposure length, completion and production types are all relevant to conventional well design. The "Morphing" of a Multilateral Well Multilateral wells metamorphose away from the process of conventional well design by creating more options. Instead of one reservoir entry point, it is possible to have two or more. Instead of one set of reservoir conditions, there may be two or more (including fluid types). Target geometries become more convoluted and 3-dimensional, and differences in approach and mindset come to bear with multilateral wells (Figure 1.). Issues Unique to Multilateral Wells The placement and construction of the multilateral junction are the key design differentiators between conventional and multilateral wells, and are the most critical elements in a successful multilateral well project.
TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435.
TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractPlacement of the multilateral junction is one of the most critical elements in the design of a multilateral well. A misplaced or mal-performing junction can have an adverse effect on an otherwise successful multilateral project. The optimum placement of the junction is a function of reservoir, geological, drilling, and completion criteria. The list may include such criteria as reservoir development strategy, pressures & heterogeneity, geological structure, lithology, wellbore stability, multilateral junction integrity, directional drilling requirements, logging requirements, artificial lift design, and completion type. These combined factors have a direct economic impact on the success and viability of the project.This paper describes a process whereby the proper junction selection criteria can be evaluated in light of pertinent technical and economic criteria and examines lessons learned from case histories with junction problems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.