No abstract

DDD and AAI pacemakers are considered physiological, since they preserve atrioventricular (AV) synchrony. Artificial pacing, however, is performed largely from right heart chambers, causing aberrant depolarization pathways. Pacing at the right atrial appendage (RAP) is known to delay left atrial contraction due to interatrial conduction time (IACT), and right ventricular (RV) apical pacing (RVP) delays left ventricular (LV) contraction due to interventricular conduction time (IVCT). These delays may render the left heart AV intervals (LAV) either too short or too long, thus affecting LV systolic function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the actual LAV intervals during conventional, right heart AAI and DDD pacing. Resulting LAV intervals were compared to programmed AV values during all DDD pacing modalities. Ten patients with DDD and six patients with AAI pacemakers were studied. IACT was measured from the atrial spike to the onset of left P wave, as recorded by an esophageal lead. Systolic time intervals were measured using either a carotid pulse tracing or a densitogram (photoplethysmography). LV function was appraised by measuring rate-corrected LV ejection time (LVETc). IVCT was measured indirectly as the lengthening of LV preejection period (PEP) caused by RV pacing, as compared to normal depolarization pathway. Intrinsic IACT and IVCT were considered zero. Right heart AV intervals (RAV) were measured from surface ECG and LAVs were calculated according to the following equations: Sinus Rhythm: LAV = RAV; Atrial Pace + Ventricular Sense: LAV = RAV - IACT; Atrial Sense + Ventricular Pace: LAV = RAV + IVCT; Sequential AV Pace: LAV = RAV - IACT + IVCT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Programming the right heart AV interval to a normal value may cause a nonphysiological left heart AV due to interatrial and interventricular conduction delays, thus affecting cardiac performance. Since AV normalization at rest and exercise may be invalidated by pacing or sensing (mode) changes, the aim of this study was to (1) study the feasibility of a mode independent pacemaker (PM) algorithm for automatic beat-to-beat left AV normalization, (2) establish normal values for the time between mitral flow A wave (Af) and ventricular activation (Va), the AfVa interval, the mechanical surrogate of left AV, and (C) determine the range of values of the interatrial electromechanical delays (IAEMDs) and the effect of RA pacing. To pace with the proper right AV, the previously reported RV-paced interventricular electromechanical delay and the interatrial electromechanical delay, either P-sensed (IAEMDs) or atrial-paced (IAEMDp) are required inputs. Data were collected during diagnostic echo Doppler studies in 84 subjects divided in three groups: (1) control with narrow QRS and no structural heart disease (n = 33, age 50 +/- 21 years, 42% men); (2) patients in sinus rhythm with diverse cardiac pathologies except LBBB (n = 39, age 69 +/- 14 years, 56% men), and (3) DDD-paced patients (n = 12, mean age 71 +/- 6 years). Normal values of AfVa were established from the control group, while IAEMDs and IAEMDp and active atrial flow time (A-peak), in all subjects. The algorithm was tested by computer simulation under all possible modes with the following calculation: RAV = N + IAEMD - IVD, where RAV is the right AV, N is the desired normal AfVa value, IAEMD is either P-sensed or A-paced, and IVD is close to zero for intrinsic narrow QRS and biventricular pacing, or 79 ms for RV pacing. The results demonstrated (1) Normal (controls) AfVa: 85 +/- 15 ms (range 52-110 ms); (2) IAEMDs (All): 84 +/- 16 ms; (3) atrial pacing prolonged IAEMDs by 57 +/- 18 ms (from 93 +/- 15 to 150 +/- 25 ms, P < 0.0001); and (4) Computer simulation of rate and mode changes validated the normalization algorithm. An automatic, beat-to-beat left AV normalization algorithm to preserve a normal AfVa without a hemodynamic sensor is feasible. The normal value of AfVa is 85 +/- 15 ms.

Ear densitographic ejection times (EDET) and first derivative ear densitogram ejection times (dEDET) were studied to determine whether their reliability and validity justify their substitution for ejection times derived from the far less stable carotid pulse tracing. Inter-and intra-subject comparisons were made on thirty individuals under a wide variety of disease and challenge states. Statistical analysis of the data-which had been obtained through a blinded procedure-showed an overall correlation (r) of .98 for carotid vs EDET and .99 for carotid vs dEDET. The t-test demonstrated no significant differences among ejection times derived from the three methods. Moreover, the close tracking at rest and during challenges of ejection times derived from these curves with those from the carotid indicate that either method may be substituted for standard carotid curves without sacrificing reliability or validity of the measure. Both ear curves offer distinct advantages over carotid pulse curves because their sensor is self-retaining and they remain stable during exercise and other body and respiratory movements. The additional feature of simplicity in reading the first derivative of the ear densitogram over its undifferentiated curve makes dEDET the preferred method. Additional Indexing Words: Ear densitography Left ventricular ejection time Carotid pulse curve Ear densitogram DETERMINATION of left ventricular ejection time (LVET) is often valuable when evaluating systolic performance of the heart. The reliability of carotid arterial displacement curves for measuring left ventricular ejection time has been well documented.' 2 Practical application of this technique, however, has been difficult under a variety of circumstances. Exercise data from this laboratory obtained during upright bicycle ergometry3 demonstrate that carotid pulse curves can be recorded during exercise despite baseline instability and extraneous motion artifacts. However, obtaining satisfactory curves requires great care and many tracings may be difficult to read. Obesity, highly developed sternomastoid muscle, tracheostomy, heavy breathing, pronounced swallowing and challenges such as postural changes and isometric exercise are additional examples of conditions which often lead to unsatisfactory carotid displacement curves. In an effort to avoid these problems, densitographic curves were used to measure LVET.4 Results from these studies showed high correlation coefficients between left ventricular ejection times derived from carotid and ear densitographic curves for 24 subjects at rest and two subjects undergoing bicycle ergometry. The ear densitogram offered the increased advantage of baseline stability and freedom from extraneous motion artifacts during exercise.The purpose of this investigation was to assess the versatility and the performance of the ear densitograph in producing accurate ejection times both in static conditions and under a wide variety of challenges. Because the densitograph yields a damped wave form, ejection time measurements...