Objective To construct reference ranges for cisterna magna (CM)
Purpose: Assessment of cardiac function in the fetal heart is challenging because of its small size and high heart rate, restricted physical access to the fetus, and impossibility of fetal ECG recording. We aimed to standardize the acquisition and postprocessing of fetal echocardiography for deformation analysis and to assess its feasibility, reproducibility, and correlation for longitudinal strain and strain rate measurements by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and 2D speckle tracking (2D-strain) during pregnancy. Methods: Echocardiography was performed in 56 fetuses. 2D and color TDI in apical or basal four-chamber views were recorded for subsequent analysis. Caution was taken to achieve a frame rate >70 Hz for speckle tracking and >150 Hz for TDI analysis. For each acquisition, 7.5 s of noncompressed data were stored in cine loop format and analyzed offline. Since fetal ECG information is by definition not available, aortic valve closure was marked from aortic flow and the onset of each cardiac cycle was manually indicated in the 2D images. Sample volume length was standardized at the minimum size. Two observers measured the left and right ventricular peak systolic longitudinal strain and strain-rate. Results: Strain and strain rate measurements were feasible in 93% of the TDI and 2D-strain acquisitions. The mean time spent on analyzing TDI images was 18 min, with an intraclass agreement coefficient of 0.86 (95% CI 0.77–0.92), 0.83 (95% CI 0.72–0.90), 0.96 (95% CI 0.93–0.98), and 0.86 (95% CI 0.76–0.92) for basal left and right free wall peak systolic strain and strain rate, respectively. Agreement between observers using tissue Doppler also showed high reliability. The mean time spent for 2D-strain analysis was 15 min, with an intraclass agreement coefficient of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.98), 0.94 (95% CI 0.89–0.96), 0.96 (95% CI 0.93–0.98), and 0.84 (95% CI 0.73–0.90) for basal left and right free wall peak systolic strain and strain rate, respectively. Agreement between observers also showed a high reliability that was similar for TDI and 2D-strain. There was a weak correlation between TDI and 2D-strain measurements. Conclusions: A standard protocol with fixed acquisition and processing settings, including manual indication of the timing events of the cardiac cycle to correct for the lack of ECG, was feasible and reproducible for the evaluation of longitudinal ventricular strain and strain rate of the fetal heart by TDI as well as 2D-strain analysis. However, both techniques are not interchangeable as the correlation between them is relatively poor.
Fetal growth restriction (FGR) because of placental insufficiency affects 5% to 7% of pregnancies and represents one of the leading causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality.1 Numerous historical cohort studies 2 and animal models 3 have demonstrated that FGR has a strong association not only with metabolic but also with primary cardiovascular remodeling that lead to long-term adverse consequences in later life. The rapid cell proliferation and differentiation during fetal growth are sensitive to any of the even smallest changes damaging the environment that can lead to permanent alterations in structural and functional constitution, which may persist into the adult life. 2 The heart is a central organ in the prenatal adaptation to placental insufficiency and fetal hypoxia. Previous studies have demonstrated remodeled hearts (more globular) with signs of systolic and diastolic dysfunction and preserved ejection fraction. [4][5][6] FGR cases are associated with prenatal adverse cardiac remodeling 4,5 that persists postnatally, 6 and low birth weight was linked to increased cardiovascular mortality in adulthood.2 Chronic pressure/volume overload together with hypoxia in utero have been postulated as the potential underlying mechanistic pathway of prenatal cardiovascular remodeling in FGR. 5,6 Editorial see p 759 Clinical Perspective on p 787Although evaluation of cardiac function with echocardiography has traditionally been limited to volume-based assessment, recent developments in cardiac ultrasound allow the noninvasive measurement of cardiac deformation with direct assessment of myocardial muscle by assessing regional Background-Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with global adverse cardiac remodeling in utero and increased cardiovascular mortality in adulthood. Prenatal myocardial deformation has not been evaluated in FGR to date. We aimed to evaluate prenatal cardiac remodeling comprehensively in FGR including myocardial deformation imaging. Methods and Results-Echocardiography was performed in 37 consecutive FGR (defined as birthweight <10th centile) and 37 normally grown fetuses. A comprehensive fetal echocardiography was performed including tissue Doppler and 2-dimensional-derived strain and strain rate. Postnatal blood pressure measurement at 6 months of age was also performed. FGR cases showed signs of more globular hearts with decreased longitudinal motion (left systolic annular peak velocity: controls mean 6 cm/s [SD myocardial strain and strain rate. [7][8][9] Strain is defined as change in length/thickness of a segment of myocardium relative to its resting length and is expressed as a percentage; strain rate is the velocity of this deformation.7-9 Myocardial deformation imaging has demonstrated a high sensitivity for detecting preclinical myocardial dysfunction in various pathological conditions characterized by myocardial dysfunction, despite preserved ejection fraction, such as asymptomatic carriers of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, sarcomeric mutations, Fabry disease, or myocardial ste...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.